<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/23460/Java_for_OS_2_eComStation_Project_Started</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:18:07 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Why?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?430814</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?430814</guid>
			<description>It is definitely possible, the BSD people have pulled this off, and it has been done before by Innotek. But I cannot stop wondering why? The WSEB kernel is closed-source and owned by IBM. They do not have a real interest in supporting OS/2 for the general public, except for the few customers that they still have. The architecture is not going to move, and will slowly become obsolete.<br />
<br />
If people like the Workplace Shell and API so much, port it to another environment (BSD or Linux) where it can shine... I know that such an effort is underway. And you'll get Java for free...</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (danieldk)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Why?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?430849</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?430849</guid>
			<description>I heard somewhere that many banking terminals still use OS/2 and eComStation. Modern Java support would theoretically ease the transition to something newer and better, be it on the server or the client side.<br />
<br />
Also, as a desktop OS, it would surely be nice to have access to the repository of desktop Java software, which is unquestionably much larger and more up-to-date than anything else in the OS/2 world. Eclipse in particular, being an IBM project and all, seems like a prime example.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 23:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Moochman)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Why?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?430854</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?430854</guid>
			<description>As more and more applications are being developed in Java, having an up-to-date Java Virtual Machine becomes a rapid way to access such recent applications.  This is a worthwhile path to renew the interest in the platform and get a few developers back into native development for OS/2 and eConStation (and also the OS/2 recreation projects).</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (BlueofRainbow)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
