<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/23504/12_Interesting_Unusual_Linux_Distros</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:34:51 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Specialists</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?432046</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?432046</guid>
			<description>I really like these specialist distributions and have already used nearly all of them. They are not really unknown, they just are not general purpose distributions like most others.<br />
<br />
Sometimes you can't use your general purpose system to accomplish a task and I think most people who are looking for a good way to accomplish a task already know most of the listed distributions.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (reez)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Specialists</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?432091</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?432091</guid>
			<description>Being specialists, they focus on the purpose and remain small.<br />
<br />
One apparently missing from this list of specialists is SystemRescueCD which has proven usefull to me in the past for pre-emptive system preservation.<br />
<br />
Another one which I feel is missing from the list is PuppyLinux which I also enjoy from time to time.  Its relatively small size is definitvely a factor.  However, its unique strength is in the combination of the features of a LiveCD with that of an auto back-up of changes (onto the media with an optical writer or the USB-Key).  On the other hand, ROX (RiscOS on X) as file browser/manager is a bit ackward at first.<br />
<br />
I like the reference to MenuetOS in the article.  Although not a Linux distribution, it fits on a single floppy disk which is quite a feat for the features it offers.  Unfortunately, not much in terms of general use applications.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 01:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (BlueofRainbow)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Not so easy anyore</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?432107</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?432107</guid>
			<description>A few years ago was quite easy to roll out a complete linux distro and a skilled user could get by with any of them.<br />
Today the complexity and the number of components have gone up. So has the manpower needed to run a distro.<br />
Finally Ubuntu has raised the bar for hardware support and packages avalability to a level that is hard to match.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 07:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (soulrebel123)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Not so easy anyore</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?432221</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?432221</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Finally Ubuntu has raised the bar for hardware support and packages avalability to a level that is hard to match. </div><br />
<br />
I do not wish to troll, but Ubuntu raised the bar... in hardware support? Packages availability?<br />
<br />
Does it have more drivers (...) than say, Fedora?<br />
Does it have better hardware detection than say, OpenSUSE?<br />
Does it have more packages than say, Debian?<br />
<br />
I believe you'll find it -very- hard to put actual numbers behind these claims.<br />
<br />
- Gilboa</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 23:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (gilboa)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>CSI Linux: CAINE</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?432224</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?432224</guid>
			<description>Has anyone used CAINE's data recovery applications. Is it equivalent or can it perform similar tasks as Ontrack Datarecovery or EASEUS data recovery?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 23:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (John Blink)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
