<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/23770/Bricscad_V10_for_Linux_Released</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:44:13 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>interesting</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?439715</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?439715</guid>
			<description>anyone used this? If this turns out to be a good piece of software that will be one less thing i have to use windows for.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 19:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (poundsmack)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: interesting</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?439723</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?439723</guid>
			<description>how can an autocad-clone be a good pice of software?<br />
autocad was already out-dated 15 years ago</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 19:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (smashIt)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: interesting</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?439725</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?439725</guid>
			<description>Given the rather limited *cough* amount of CAD applications available for Linux I really wouldn't complain :S</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (WereCatf)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: interesting</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?439733</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?439733</guid>
			<description>And being a standard is sadly more important than being a good piece of software. Some industry-standard software exist only to prove this sentence right everyday (everyone will have some names in mind, sadly I can't reveal those in my own mind without being flagged as troll <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /> ).Edited 2010-09-07 20:30 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Neolander)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: interesting</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?439736</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?439736</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">And being a standard is sadly more important than being good. </div><br />
<br />
autocad has lost it's standard-position long ago<br />
there isn't much left of the autocad-kingdom besides architecture<br />
everything else has moved on to 3d a decade ago</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (smashIt)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: interesting</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?439752</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?439752</guid>
			<description>AutoCAD does 3D, their market share is over 55% of the CAD market. The closest competitor is at 15%.<br />
 <br />
  <br />
 <a href="http://frombulator.com/2009/10/cad-marketshare-bim-marketshare-installed-seats-installed-base-bim-cad/" rel="nofollow">http://frombulator.com/2009/10/cad-marketshare-bim-marketshare-inst...</a> Edited 2010-09-07 21:38 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (tylerdurden)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Already available CAD software for Linux</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?439754</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?439754</guid>
			<description>VariCAD for Windows and Linux can handle DWG/DXF/STEP/IGES/etc. <br />
<a href="http://www.varicad.com/en/home/" rel="nofollow">http://www.varicad.com/en/home/</a></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jello)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Already available CAD software for Linux</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?439792</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?439792</guid>
			<description>The VariCAD website says it only does 2D DWG import/export.  The Bricsys website says it &quot;offers full-function 2D/3D DWG-based CAD ...&quot;</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Hypnos)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>re: Autocad being old and outdated...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?439793</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?439793</guid>
			<description>I've worked in institutions that remain WAYYYY behind in software (including OS) versions.  If there is no immediate need or compelling reason to upgrade their software, they simply don't.<br />
 <br />
 Banking institutions are pretty notorious for not wanting to change once some framework is in place.  They only upgrade when they are told the software they are running will no longer be supported by the company who made it.  And even then they will resort to in-house support (at least they used to, I've been out of that industry for awhile now).<br />
<br />
[edit]<br />
<br />
My point being any apps that support older formats would be welcomed I am sure.Edited 2010-09-08 00:41 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Tuishimi)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: re: Autocad being old and outdated...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?439810</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?439810</guid>
			<description>Sometimes, it's a healthy approach to take. An old software has been tested and patched several for several years, there are no surprise bugs that could affect the daily operation of the company.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Quake)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: interesting</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?439814</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?439814</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">autocad has lost it's standard-position long ago </div><br />
     <br />
     Autocad isn't the standard that Briscad implement. DWG format files is the (defacto) standard, not Autocad.<br />
     <br />
     Read about it here:<br />
    <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Design_Alliance" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Design_Alliance</a><br />
     <br />
     and here:<br />
     <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.dwg" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.dwg</a><br />
    <div class="cquote">DWG (&quot;drawing&quot;) is a file format used for storing two and three dimensional design data and metadata. It is the native format for several CAD packages including AutoCAD, IntelliCAD (and its variants) and Caddie. </div><br />
    <br />
    Bricscad uses the IntelliCAD engine. Bricscad is therefore a variant of IntelliCAD.<br />
     <br />
     The DWG file format itself is the critical issue. Because many companies have existing large libraries of DWG-format files, the IP of those engineering companies is dependent on, and tied up in, the DWG format.<br />
     <br />
     Autodesk (Autocad vendors) have for many years tried to use the DWG file format as a form of lock-in.<br />
  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.dwg#Legal_issues" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.dwg#Legal_issues</a><br />
   Ultimately they did not succeed.<br />
     <br />
     <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bricscad" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bricscad</a><br />
     <div class="cquote">Bricscad is a CAD package developed by Bricsys, it was originally built using the IntelliCAD engine. It is designed for Windows and is among the few commercially supported CAD packages which runs on Linux.<br />
     <br />
     Bricscad uses the Open Design Alliance DWG libraries to read and write the DWG file format made popular by the AutoCAD CAD package. </div><br />
     <br />
     The DWG file format is the native file format of the Bricscad CAD software package.Edited 2010-09-08 05:12 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 04:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lemur2)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Very impressive</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?439832</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?439832</guid>
			<description>Look at the feature to feature comparison:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.bricsys.com/en_INTL/bricscad/comparison.jsp" rel="nofollow">http://www.bricsys.com/en_INTL/bricscad/comparison.jsp</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (porcel)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: interesting</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?439841</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?439841</guid>
			<description>Well, at least on civil engineering they are thriving (actually, is really hard to see something else being used) and still is used on mechanical and electrical ones, specially inside the structural design. For the last two it was really not the best fit to design parts, even if I saw sometimes it being used.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (acobar)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Yawn...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?439918</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?439918</guid>
			<description>While the featureset looks quite impressive, especially given the price (which is tiny by CAD standards), for the average Linux user, this is still an expensive piece of software. Given that most desktop Linux users are looking for free stuff, I suspect that this will go over worse than a lead balloon in the market.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (madcrow)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Yawn...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?440008</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?440008</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">While the featureset looks quite impressive, especially given the price (which is tiny by CAD standards), for the average Linux user, this is still an expensive piece of software. Given that most desktop Linux users are looking for free stuff, I suspect that this will go over worse than a lead balloon in the market. </div><br />
 <br />
 <a href="http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/08/linapp-website-provides-an-awesome-list-of-commercial-linux-apps/" rel="nofollow">http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/08/linapp-website-provides-an-aweso...</a> <br />
<br />
<a href="http://lin-app.com/Edited" rel="nofollow">http://lin-app.com/Edited</a> 2010-09-09 11:20 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lemur2)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
