<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/23777/Apple_Releases_iOS_4_1</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:00:23 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Still Slow on a 3G</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?440003</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?440003</guid>
			<description>Loading the Messages App is still slow on iOS4.1 compared to the old 3.x series (for something used so frequently it should be tagged as a memory resident app like Safari - even on the 3G).</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (cwaig_g)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>HDR photography</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?440009</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?440009</guid>
			<description>Does the arrival of HDR photography on iOS mean that iPhone photos will now be easily recognizable due to their blurry and over-exposed ugly look, just like when HDR is used in gaming ?<br />
  <br />
  <a href="http://www.2kgames.com/cultofrapture/features/fankit/3small.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.2kgames.com/cultofrapture/features/fankit/3small.jpg</a>  <br />
 <br />
 EDIT : Well, looking at Apple's examples, if the HDR-enabled photo is effectively the one on the left, it may be the case...<br />
 <br />
 <a href="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/ipod-liveblog-2010-0079-rm-eng.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/ipod-liveblog...</a>   (can't even see the sky anymore, overexposed cathedral and grass)<br />
 <a href="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/ipod-liveblog-2010-0080-rm-eng.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/ipod-liveblog...</a>   (overexposed sky, less deep shadows)<br />
 <a href="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/ipod-liveblog-2010-0082-rm-eng.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/ipod-liveblog...</a>   (still can't see the sky, tower and details behind the girl fade to white too)Edited 2010-09-09 11:40 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Neolander)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: HDR photography</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?440014</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?440014</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">EDIT : Well, looking at Apple's examples, if the HDR-enabled photo is effectively the one on the left, it may be the case... </div><br />
<br />
No, surely it is the one on the right? Having looked at a lot of HDR previews, and personally used the 3G/3GS and 4 cameras, the level of background detail in non HDR would be in line with the first image. The iPhone really only focuses on the main item in the plane of view and really, really doesn't deal with too much/too little light.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (henderson101)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: HDR photography</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?440016</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?440016</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">No, surely it is the one on the right? Having looked at a lot of HDR previews, and personally used the 3G/3GS and 4 cameras, the level of background detail in non HDR would be in line with the first image. The iPhone really only focuses on the main item in the plane of view and really, really doesn't deal with too much/too little light. </div><br />
 Okay, so in that case there are some peoples in the world who know how to use HDR properly. Good to know <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /> Edited 2010-09-09 12:25 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Neolander)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: HDR photography</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?440307</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?440307</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote"> Okay, so in that case there are some peoples in the world who know how to use HDR properly. Good to know <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" />  </div><br />
<br />
I installed 4.1 last night - the difference is noticeable. The results are literally astounding! It can't make you a better photographer, but it for sure makes a real difference. The bst part - it saves you a non HDR copy by default, so you can see how much better the picture really is.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (henderson101)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
