<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/23885/ScaraOS_0_6_Released</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:48:47 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>pretty neat</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?444387</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?444387</guid>
			<description>it's actually pretty neat, especially if your interested in OS design fundamentals.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (poundsmack)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Its on the List...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?444462</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?444462</guid>
			<description>It would be really fun to just take a week off of work and just study the guts of all of these cool OS-es. Like a OScation.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 02:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Bill Shooter of Bul)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>News?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?444553</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?444553</guid>
			<description>I'm not one to detract from scara's work, but I don't think that page has been updated since 2003 (unless the cvs id is wrong??)</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 20:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (castleinthesky)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: News?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?444558</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?444558</guid>
			<description>It doesn't look too inactive. Maybe the ID is really wrong. The copyright says 2010 and on github there is also activity:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://github.com/giannitedesco/scaraOS" rel="nofollow">http://github.com/giannitedesco/scaraOS</a></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 22:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (reez)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: News?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?444614</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?444614</guid>
			<description>So it is. Mea culpa.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (castleinthesky)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>nice os</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?444633</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?444633</guid>
			<description>I wonder if any of the os is written in assembly</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 23:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (paul14213us)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: nice os</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?444661</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?444661</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">I wonder if any of the os is written in assembly </div><br />
There is necessarily at least a part written in assembly. Consider hardware-specific features like paging : you need CPU-specific instructions to access them.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 09:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Neolander)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: nice os</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?444665</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?444665</guid>
			<description>There is necessarily at least a part written in assembly. Consider hardware-specific features like paging : you need CPU-specific instructions to access them.<br />
<br />
Correct. It's however surprisingly little assembly you need. You can just write very small, specific functions and call them from some higher-level code and you end up with only a few hundred lines of actual assembly code. I too used plain C in my kernel to do all the rest, just a few scattered assembler functions when something couldn't be done in any other way.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 12:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (WereCatf)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>The name of the OS always makes me think of...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?444753</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?444753</guid>
			<description>Dr. Who's most famous enemies... (no, not the cybermen, either - The other one's from the planet... Skaro).</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Tuishimi)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
