<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/23972/openSUSE_Very_Much_Alive</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:04:10 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comment by Radio</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?447884</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?447884</guid>
			<description>The OBS revolution is spreading <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Radio)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Linux distribution shakedown</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?447915</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?447915</guid>
			<description>It has been interesting to see the moves made by the two most notable distributions in my life: (open)SuSE and Ubuntu.<br />
<br />
Ubuntu seems interested in providing an appliance-like experience to most of its users.<br />
<br />
SuSE seems to be interested in broadening the ecosystem around SuSE to be more inclusive of different distributions and different market segments as defined by external entities. As such, they are working on creating tooling that allows these external entities to decide how to apply items available from various SuSE services, such as OBS.<br />
<br />
I hope it works out well for Ubuntu. I have a much greater stake in seeing SuSE's objectives work out well. I believe their efforts will help increase Linux adoption more by manufacturers including Linux in their products.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lfeagan)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>To fork or not to fork</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?447953</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?447953</guid>
			<description><i>Instead of deciding to fork a major desktop</i><br />
<br />
Hehe, read Jono Bacon's latest post, apparently removing the most important UI element in Gnome 3.0 (i.e. Gnome Shell) together with assorted stuff to replace all of that with Ubuntu developed elements is <b>not</b> enough to call it a fork!<br />
<br />
They're free to do what they want, that's the beauty (and danger) of free software, but why are they so afraid to call things with their proper name?<br />
<br />
A perplexed Ubuntu user...<br />
<br />
Rehdon</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Rehdon)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>OpenSuse is my main desktop OS at home ...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?447957</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?447957</guid>
			<description>and I am looking forward for 11.4</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 08:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (fithisux)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
