<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/24130/FreeBSD_on_EC2</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:45:54 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>cool but ..</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?453373</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?453373</guid>
			<description>this is all cool .. as long as you don't intend to upset any governments ...<br />
<br />
is that NDA something to do with a killswitch?Edited 2010-12-14 00:04 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (project_2501)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Just curious</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?453397</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?453397</guid>
			<description>But having an NDA would necessitate having some parts of this be closed source wouldn't it?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 02:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (darknexus)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Just curious</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?453419</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?453419</guid>
			<description>Dunno all NDA cases all over the world, but RadeonHD developers also needed to sign NDA's with AMD and RadeonHD does not contain any binary blobs, it just says that he is not allowed to share all knowledge he gains there, logic and so, its not about the code.Edited 2010-12-14 06:06 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 06:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (vermaden)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Just curious</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?453518</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?453518</guid>
			<description>Not really. It could be to do with the peculiarities of running another type of machine with differences, such as storage, that they don't want to reveal.<br />
 <br />
 As far as I know the only difference between micro and other instances is that more expensive instances have a certain amount of 'ephemeral' local storage for things like swap space.Edited 2010-12-14 16:38 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (segedunum)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Too late</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?453526</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?453526</guid>
			<description>I have been waiting for it for quite a long time, but the WikiLeaks incident made me cancel my account.<br />
 <br />
 Damn, Amazon. Why couldn't you keep WikiLeaks online?<br />
 I would already be setting up my stuff on EC2.Edited 2010-12-14 17:09 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (reez)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
