<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/24177/Creating_an_LVM-backed_FreeBSD_DomU_in_a_Linux_Dom0</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:29:58 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>kFreeBSD</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?454968</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?454968</guid>
			<description>To bad kFreeBSD can't be used for that yet. Atleast that is what it looks like from here.<br />
<br />
Would have been kinda funny. Running Debian GNU/Linux on top of Debian GNU/kFreeBSD.<br />
<br />
I think the other way around does work: Debian GNU/kFreeBSD on top of Debian GNU/Linux.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 23:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Lennie)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: kFreeBSD</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?454992</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?454992</guid>
			<description>Correct, FreeBSD doesn't support Xen Dom0.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 03:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (phoenix)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: kFreeBSD</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?454993</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?454993</guid>
			<description>By the way, NetBSD can be used as Dom0.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 03:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ebasconp)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: kFreeBSD</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?454995</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?454995</guid>
			<description>Has the NetBSD dom0 support been updated beyond Xen 2.x?  I haven't kept up with it (prefer KVM over Xen), but last I heard, it hadn't been updated to Xen 3.x yet.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 04:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (phoenix)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: kFreeBSD</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?455015</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?455015</guid>
			<description><a href="http://www.netbsd.org/ports/xen/" rel="nofollow">http://www.netbsd.org/ports/xen/</a>   It seems that at least HEAD is updated to support dom0 support. Since one of the developers behind Xen is NetBSD guy as far as I know (I am not sure whether still he is or not though), NetBSD is always more up to date than any other BSD I assume.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (t3RRa)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: kFreeBSD</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?455031</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?455031</guid>
			<description>As far as I know, NetBSD Xen is already in version 3.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 15:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ebasconp)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>EC2</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?455045</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?455045</guid>
			<description>I'm not trying to pimp EC2, BUT, there is a FreeBSD-Current (9.0) AMI (Amazon uses Xen for EC2) easily available.  Also you can get a free t1.micro instance (653M RAM/ 10G root device) for a year.  Tried it out and it works nicely..</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 17:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (somnambulant)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
