<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/24501/Linux_Is_Vulnerable_to_Malicious_USB_Devices</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 09:01:51 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Fix</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465300</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465300</guid>
			<description>is there any fix coming? has this been fixed yet?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (diegoviola)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>LOL</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465301</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465301</guid>
			<description><b>USB device with an unusually long name (over 80 characters)</b> who the f*** uses 80+ characters to name a usb drive?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (d.marcu)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: LOL</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465303</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465303</guid>
			<description>The person attacking the computer.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Soulbender)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Fix</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465304</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465304</guid>
			<description>Yes<br />
<a href="http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound-2.6.git&amp;a=commitdiff&amp;h=eaae55dac6b64c0616046436b294e69fc5311581" rel="nofollow">http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound-2.6.git&amp;a...</a><br />
<br />
It was fixed on Feb. 14 2011</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (senshikaze)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Caiaq USB ?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465306</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465306</guid>
			<description>What is it ? Is it actually a widespread device ? Never heard of that.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (torturedutopian)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: LOL</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465313</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465313</guid>
			<description>Let me spell it out for you: a malicious person.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ivanzinho)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Fix</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465317</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465317</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Yes<br />
<a href="http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound-2.6.git&amp;amp;a=commitdiff&amp;amp;h=eaae55dac6b64c0616046436b294e69fc5311581" rel="nofollow">http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound-2.6.git&amp;a...</a><br />
<br />
It was fixed on Feb. 14 2011 </div><br />
<br />
Heh, we have been fixing a ton of issues like that in Haiku recently - Coverity picks them up like a champ <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (umccullough)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: LOL</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465318</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465318</guid>
			<description>so this guy must have access to my pc and insert a 80+ characters named usb drive in order to exploit it? It's not like if i have a usb drive with a huge name my computer can be exploited by a hacker half way around the world. I'll restrict my usb drives to less characters, just in case.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (d.marcu)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Isn't the title misleading?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465320</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465320</guid>
			<description>The title promises a lot - it sounds like some rather general exploit on the Linux kernel, when it is nothing more than a buffer overflow bug in a particular driver.<br />
<br />
I wouldn't be that surprised to see that on Slashdot - and then promptly tagged there with the &quot;notnews&quot; tag - but I don't think that it is really much of an event (I think, without having seen statistics about it, that dozens, if not hundreds, of such bugs are found and fixed each year.) - at least not enough of an event to warrant a place on OSNews.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jhominal)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: LOL</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465321</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465321</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">so this guy must have access to my pc and insert a 80+ characters named usb drive in order to exploit it? It's not like if i have a usb drive with a huge name my computer can be exploited by a hacker half way around the world. I'll restrict my usb drives to less characters, just in case. </div><br />
<br />
It may not affect you - but something like this is indeed bad. For example, what prevents a Kiosk running Linux from being pwned. Think: digital picture processing kiosk at the drug store.<br />
<br />
It's even more disturbing after reading the recent report on what governments have been up to with HBGary:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/02/black-ops-how-hbgary-wrote-backdoors-and-rootkits-for-the-government.ars/" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/02/black-ops-how-hbgar...</a></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (umccullough)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: LOL</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465328</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465328</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">It's even more disturbing after reading the recent report on what governments have been up to with HBGary: </div><br />
<br />
On the other hand, considering how easily he got owned how good can he actually be and how much should we trust what he says he has done?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Soulbender)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: LOL</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465330</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465330</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">"<i>It's even more disturbing after reading the recent report on what governments have been up to with HBGary: </div><br />
<br />
On the other hand, considering how easily he got owned how good can he actually be and how much should we trust what he says he has done? </i>"<br />
<br />
Well, if you follow the story, HBGary Federal was owned, HBGary was collateral damage. They apparently do have some decent technology, including unreleased 0day exploits...<br />
<br />
But the important bit is: The U.S. government is knowingly hiring firms to exploit via hardware ports such as USB and PCMCIA.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (umccullough)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: LOL</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465331</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465331</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote"><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/02/black-ops-how-hbgary-wrote-backdoors-and-rootkits-for-the-government.ars/" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/02/black-ops-how-hbgar...</a> </div><br />
<br />
Thank you for sharing, that post is very interesting.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Petur)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[6]: LOL</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465332</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465332</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">But the important bit is: The U.S. government is knowingly hiring firms to exploit via hardware ports such as USB and PCMCIA. </div><br />
<br />
Why hire someone to break in when you can just pay the coder to not lock the door?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 20:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Petur)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[6]: LOL</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465333</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465333</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">They apparently do have some decent technology, including unreleased 0day exploits... </div><br />
 <br />
 Or so he says. To be honest, reading that article it feels like the wet daydreams of some loser who has watched too many spy movies. Like some cyber version of Jonathan Idema.<br />
 <br />
 <div class="cquote">[The U.S. government is knowingly hiring firms to exploit via hardware ports such as USB and PCMCIA. </div><br />
 <br />
 I would not expect anything less.Edited 2011-03-08 20:13 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 20:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Soulbender)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Caiaq USB ?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465338</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465338</guid>
			<description>I looked into it, but the module is running on my install (Ubuntu 10.10). Not sure what hardware is it hooked to.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 20:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (senshikaze)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Caiaq USB ?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465339</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465339</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">I looked into it, but the module is running on my install (Ubuntu 10.10). Not sure what hardware is it hooked to. </div><br />
<br />
CONFIG_SND_USB_CAIAQ=m<br />
CONFIG_SND_USB_CAIAQ_INPUT=y<br />
<br />
Sound card?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 20:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (nbensa)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Caiaq USB ?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465341</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465341</guid>
			<description>Looks like it <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
   <br />
   <a href="http://caiaq.com/index_en.html" rel="nofollow">http://caiaq.com/index_en.html</a><br />
   <br />
  <div class="cquote">To date, serveral high-quality USB 2.0 audio interfaces, music production controllers and a WLAN based Multiroom Audio System have been delivered. </div><br />
  <br />
  <br />
  <a href="http://www.globalsecuritymag.com/Vigil-nce-Linux-kernel-buffer,20110217,22132.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalsecuritymag.com/Vigil-nce-Linux-kernel-buffer,2011...</a>   <br />
  <br />
  <div class="cquote">DESCRIPTION OF THE VULNERABILITY<br />
  <br />
  The sound/usb/caiaq directory implements the support of USB devices from the Native Instruments company.<br />
  <br />
  The snd_usb_caiaq_audio_init() and snd_usb_caiaq_midi_init() functions copy the name of the USB device in a 80 bytes array. However, if the name provided by the USB device is longer, a buffer overflow occurs.<br />
  <br />
  An attacker can therefore insert a USB device with a long name, in order to create an overflow in caiaq, leading to a denial of service or to code execution. </div><br />
<br />
(Putting some memory regions on W and X access privileges at the same time... Them fool... DEP is not here for nothing !)Edited 2011-03-08 20:56 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 20:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Neolander)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>grepping for strcat/strcpy</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465346</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465346</guid>
			<description>I downloaded a recent kernel source bundle and did: grep -IR '\\|\' *|wc -l<br />
 <br />
 This found 3558 lines. While many of them are in the form `strcpy(foo, &quot;string literal&quot;);` I think usage of these functions should be generally forbidden. All these function calls should be replaced with strlcat/strlcpy.Edited 2011-03-08 21:20 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 21:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (panzi)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Reminds me of this USB attack</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465354</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465354</guid>
			<description><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovfYBa1EHm4" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovfYBa1EHm4</a><br />
<br />
Never been a fan of Nautilus. ;-)</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 22:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Lennie)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Fix</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465362</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465362</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Yes<br />
<a href="http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound-2.6.git&amp;amp;a=commitdiff&amp;amp;h=eaae55dac6b64c0616046436b294e69fc5311581" rel="nofollow">http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound-2.6.git&amp;a...</a><br />
<br />
It was fixed on Feb. 14 2011 </div><br />
<br />
Nice, thanks.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 23:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (diegoviola)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: grepping for strcat/strcpy</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465364</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465364</guid>
			<description>Well, Ulrich Drepper does not like strlcat/strlcpy so they won't be in glibc anytime soon.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 00:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Soulbender)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: LOL</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465367</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465367</guid>
			<description><i>For example, what prevents a Kiosk running Linux from being pwned. Think: digital picture processing kiosk at the drug store.</i><br />
<br />
I have seen one of the picture processing kiosk at a local drug store and the kiosk if I remember correctly was from Kodak or Fuji film. They were actually running Windows. And with the help of my humble memory some of articles or comments on this site was saying those kiosk commonly running Windows instead of Linux. Since this is Linux bug I doubt it would affect many of those kiosk.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 01:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (t3RRa)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: LOL</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465371</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465371</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">I have seen one of the picture processing kiosk at a local drug store and the kiosk if I remember correctly was from Kodak or Fuji film. They were actually running Windows. And with the help of my humble memory some of articles or comments on this site was saying those kiosk commonly running Windows instead of Linux. Since this is Linux bug I doubt it would affect many of those kiosk. </div><br />
<br />
Sure, maybe now - but with shit like this:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://it.slashdot.org/story/10/07/06/0019234/Photo-Kiosks-Infecting-Customers-USB-Devices" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/story/10/07/06/0019234/Photo-Kiosks-Infectin...</a><br />
<br />
How long before they realize Windows is the wrong solution?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 01:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (umccullough)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>For anyone who has not updated kernel</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465387</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465387</guid>
			<description>This is Linux of course black list the driver,<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/avoid-linux-kernel-module-driver-autoloading.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/avoid-linux-kernel-module-driver-auto...</a><br />
<br />
Problem solved.  Insert infected device as much as like after that is done its worthless.<br />
<br />
Yes the hotfix to the issue.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 03:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (oiaohm)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: grepping for strcat/strcpy</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465396</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465396</guid>
			<description>The kernel can just use its own implementations of strl{cat,copy} until they are standardized, no?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 04:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Hypnos)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: grepping for strcat/strcpy</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465404</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465404</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">The kernel can just use its own implementations of strl{cat,copy} until they are standardized, no? </div><br />
<br />
Nice in theory.  Linux kernel does have strncat and strncpy and problem back in history they leaked a little memory.   So to avoid that problem some drivers changed over to strcpy so leading us todays problem.<br />
<br />
Historic chain of failure.  Hopefully this is close to the last bit of it.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 06:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (oiaohm)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[6]: LOL</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465408</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465408</guid>
			<description>Can we just stick to the subject of this article?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 08:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (t3RRa)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[6]: LOL</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465409</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465409</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Sure, maybe now - but with shit like this:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://it.slashdot.org/story/10/07/06/0019234/Photo-Kiosks-Infecting-Customers-USB-Devices" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/story/10/07/06/0019234/Photo-Kiosks-Infectin...</a><br />
<br />
How long before they realize Windows is the wrong solution? </div><br />
<br />
Ummm, never?<br />
<br />
They don't *WANT* a great solution. They want something that they don;t feel they have to reinvent the wheel err... compile from source and insert kernel modules... etc.<br />
<br />
Yeah, I know. I've had Linux Kiosks running for a Coffee House Locally for almost 4 years. Worst thing that happened is some person's web e-mail tried to write to C:\Windows\something\something\blahblahblah <br />
<br />
Plus running from an Optical Drive is nice.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 08:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (gfolkert)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: grepping for strcat/strcpy</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465430</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465430</guid>
			<description>These functions will never be standardized. c1x - the next C standard - will include the IMHO inferior but good enough(certainly better than str* and strn*) str*_s by Microsoft.<br />
<br />
This has little relevance though, given that the Linux kernel doesn't use glibc and it *does* include strlcat and strlcpy.<br />
<br />
So do glib, KDE and Samba, for example. Basically everyone but that Drepper guy has got them.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sakeniwefu)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: LOL</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465448</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465448</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Think: digital picture processing kiosk at the drug store. </div><br />
What's funny is that just the other day, I walked in front of one of those things in Walgreen's.  It was prominently displaying the Blue Screen of Death on its screen.  It's not the first time--I've seen them display standard Windows errors (including crashes) and BSODs more times than I care to remember...<br />
<br />
At this rate, I think that as long as those things are running Windows and are inoperable a large portion of the time as a result, people are &quot;relatively&quot; safe from digital picture kiosks.  LOL.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (UltraZelda64)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[7]: LOL</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?465467</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?465467</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Can we just stick to the subject of this article? </div><br />
<br />
Sure, because sticking a USB stick into a kiosk running a vulnerable operating system is soooo off topic eh?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (umccullough)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
