<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/24586/Google_To_Be_Audited_on_Privacy_After_Buzz_Complaints</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:28:38 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>I am amazed yahoo escaped ridicule</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?468470</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?468470</guid>
			<description>I created yahoo answers account once, locked down my profile as much as I could. It didn't have the same name/avatar as my yahoo mail account, but they were associated.<br />
 <br />
 Turns out every question I asked or answered was visible to my yahoo mail contacts (ie. RL people, friends, relatives, professional contacts etc.) without my knowledge.<br />
 <br />
 It wasn't until I emailed myself something and saw a list of updates for &quot;see what this user has been up to&quot; on the confirmation page that I had any idea. In the updated feed, they replaced my username/avatar with my email username/avatar.<br />
 <br />
 It was a huge breach of my privacy and I have seen nobody else online mention it I suppose because nobody uses/cares about Yahoo any more? It doesn't make it any more right.Edited 2011-03-31 07:02 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 07:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (milliamp)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by kvarbanov</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?468474</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?468474</guid>
			<description>This is the type of service you get these days - it's all about the money, by selling / showing your info at the proper places, obscured EULAs, even my lawyer cannot understand it, fortunately there are some commissions to work on that. The moral is: don't show too much interesting stuff on the net, as you may end up being disappointed, even if the provider had good intentions, still, errors can happen.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 07:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kvarbanov)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by geertjan</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?468481</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?468481</guid>
			<description>Excellent. Google made a mistake, this way it isn't likely to happen again. I think this solution is better for everybody, including Google itself.<br />
<br />
The FTC should do this more often though, not just with corporations like Google that are cooperative and open about their mistakes.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (geertjan)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Comment by kvarbanov</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?468620</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?468620</guid>
			<description>So, as EULAs are contracts, you show them to your lawyer. <br />
 <br />
 To avoid weird problems in the future that's a good move :-)Edited 2011-03-31 22:32 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Nth_Man)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
