<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/24646/Episode_41_I_Like_Chaos</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:13:14 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>playstation</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?470389</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?470389</guid>
			<description>you got it the wrong way around:<br />
ps1 and ps2 had cpu and gpu designed by sony<br />
the ps3 is the first to use a gpu by a supplyer (nvidia) and the cell-processor at least is ppc-based</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 23:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (smashIt)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Reminds me of Radio Music Theatre</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?470390</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?470390</guid>
			<description>Awesome podcast description.  The tone is almost <i>exactly</i> how Radio Music Theater (<a href="http://www.radiomusictheatre.com/index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.radiomusictheatre.com/index.htm</a>) describes their comedies (which are probably the funniest performances I've ever seen).</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 00:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (subsider34)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by RichterKuato</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?470391</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?470391</guid>
			<description>Netbooks aren't staying because Tablets are better positioned as low-end devices than they are. Netbooks are essentially cheap miniature Laptops. If Tablets go away it'll most likely be because of a even better positioned low-end device.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 00:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (RichterKuato)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>I believe that this xbmc fork was called Plex</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?470400</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?470400</guid>
			<description>Apart from that my feeling was that tablet gained from using application designed for smart-phone, where netbook were running desktop class applications most of the time (any netbook optimized app or website anyone ?), no wonder they fade in popularity.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (dvhh)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Tethering through a BlackBerry</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?470406</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?470406</guid>
			<description>'it makes sense from a marketing perspective'<br />
<br />
Maybe in the US...? Who has a BlackBerry ?<br />
<br />
I know some potential US customers have already said: really nice device, but ugh, no way will I buy a BlackBerry as well.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Lennie)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>HTML5 apps and companies</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?470411</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?470411</guid>
			<description>I've been listing to panel discussions at conferences to companies who create or have apps. They don't want to have one app per phone, device, whatever. They don't like to wait weeks for appstores approvals.<br />
<br />
Some companies do want to have an appstore as a markerting thing: A an extra place device users can go to find 'apps', that is the only part they like.<br />
<br />
So they prefer a HTML5 app solution with an appstore.<br />
<br />
So that was very encouraging.Edited 2011-04-18 12:22 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Lennie)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Chrome OS</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?470415</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?470415</guid>
			<description>Just thought I'd mention re: the discussion Android/Chrome OS that it would seem Chrome OS is actually about to enter stage left...<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2044223/google-readies-chrome-creating-stable-branch" rel="nofollow">http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2044223/google-readies-chr...</a><br />
<br />
Dunno if I care or not.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (quackalist)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Chrome OS</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?470417</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?470417</guid>
			<description>I think what the article says is wrong:<br />
<br />
&quot;The development of Chrome OS has been protracted and unlike the firm's Android operating system, which has had numerous public releases that added features, Chrome OS has been kept under wraps. Google's decision to keep Chrome OS private for so long has been questioned, not only by those who believe Android and Chrome OS do very similar things but also by those who wonder if Chrome OS will arrive too late to make any impact.&quot;<br />
<br />
Are they confused by Android Honeycomb ? Because ChromiumOS (base for ChromeOS) is just an open source project, like Chromium (base for Chrome). You can even download it now and try it out, for example from Hexxeh:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://chromeos.hexxeh.net/" rel="nofollow">http://chromeos.hexxeh.net/</a></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Lennie)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Chrome OS</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?470418</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?470418</guid>
			<description>Whatâs more, the rug could be pulled from under their feet. Changes in ChromeOS show a touch-screen keyboard interface going in. OEMs may be saying that they are not interested (and donât see much revenue) in traditional laptops any more (because of the tablet hype) forcing Google to adapt Chrome OS to touch-screens. But then, what is the point of Chrome OS when thereâs already Android 3, which offers a ton more?<br />
<br />
I think Google are simply not willing to admit to the troubles theyâre having with positioning Chrome OS. Chrome OS is their vision of how it's all supposed to be, and now Android has stomped all over that dream.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kroc)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Chrome OS</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?470420</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?470420</guid>
			<description>Why don't they create something for the appstore and Android to easily allow webapps or similair ? That would atleast be a start to get developers used to the idea.<br />
<br />
Apps like on WebOS or something like that.<br />
<br />
My guess is ChromeOS is like any other platform it takes time to get apps for the platform.<br />
<br />
Obviously any website which gets some extra HTML5 added to it is a potential app for ChromeOS.<br />
<br />
I think the whole point of ChromeOS is, it doesn't need to have a lot of capabilities.<br />
<br />
It just needs to be the best damn browser with background automatic updates and 'cloud synchronisation' (a place to keep your own settings/bookmarks/app-choices and so on so different users can use the same device and you can use the same settings with different devices and the desktop and you have a backup in case the device breaks).Edited 2011-04-18 16:20 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Lennie)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by fran</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?470431</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?470431</guid>
			<description>Kroc's voice came through a bit soft/thin and metally.<br />
Assume your using different mics?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (fran)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Comment by fran</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?470433</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?470433</guid>
			<description>I didnât apply an equaliser to my channel this time.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kroc)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Chrome OS</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?470474</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?470474</guid>
			<description>There is an other reason why Android is just annoying for Google, Oracle/patents/lawsuit.Edited 2011-04-19 00:10 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Lennie)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Dumb pipe LLC</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?470547</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?470547</guid>
			<description>Actually I have seen such a provider in my country. They don't have stuff like news servers or email addresses. They are pretty small and are using a fiber optic network owned by a company that is pretty close to the government, so they basically rent it having very low costs and very cheap products.<br />
<br />
I'd switch to them, but my home isn't connected yet, so there is still an infrastructure related problem. The funny/sad thing is that I looked on a map and basically 100m from here in every direction there would be connections.<br />
<br />
So it is possible I guess. I am living in Austria/Vienna by the way. While I don't want to advertise that provider the organization providing the infrastructure is called Blizznet. So should you live in Austria you'll be able to find that &quot;dumb&quot; and other ISPs.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (reez)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
