<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/24769/Apple_Responds_to_Lodsys_Claims_Developers_Are_Licensed</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:16:41 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comment by Lazarus</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?474257</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?474257</guid>
			<description>Nice to see Apple doing something positive for a change.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 20:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Lazarus)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>PFF</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?474258</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?474258</guid>
			<description>Hurr durr, is the applenews.com domain already taken?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 21:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (twitterfire)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by Stratoukos</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?474260</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?474260</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">They're not actually implementing any new code that itself infringes on Lodsys' patents, and as such. </div><br />
Ahh, but you see, they haven't patented code that implements in-app purchases, they've patented the idea of in-app purchases.<br />
<br />
So, if you consider OSNews to be a web app, then the OSNews premium button (does this still exists?) actually infringes said patent, and preys on the hard work of poor, poor Lodsys.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 21:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Stratoukos)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Comment by Stratoukos</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?474262</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?474262</guid>
			<description>Stratoukos,<br />
<br />
Yep, that's pretty much how patents work these days. Patents encourage this type of behavior, and those who don't play (because the system sucks all around) are the victims.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 22:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Alfman)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>A rough translation</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?474275</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?474275</guid>
			<description>Dear Lodsys,<br />
<br />
Cut your crap or we'll sue you into oblivion.<br />
<br />
Love,<br />
<br />
Apple</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 01:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mbpark)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: A rough translation</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?474277</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?474277</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Dear Lodsys,<br />
<br />
Cut your crap or we'll sue you into oblivion.<br />
<br />
Love,<br />
<br />
Apple </div><br />
<br />
Coming from one of the heavy-weight 300 pound gorillas in the room that right there can be quite helluva daunting.<br />
<br />
I deeply dislike Apple and their behaviour generally and while I understand that they're doing this only to keep developers using their App Store I still applaud them for doing the right thing, even if not for the correct reasons.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 02:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (WereCatf)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: PFF</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?474278</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?474278</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Hurr durr, is the applenews.com domain already taken? </div><br />
<br />
It resolves to IP address of 63.87.252.160 on my PC, so I'd say: yes, it is.<br />
<br />
Anything else you need assistance with?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 02:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (WereCatf)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: A rough translation</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?474286</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?474286</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote"><br />
Coming from one of the heavy-weight 300 pound gorillas in the room that right there can be quite helluva daunting.<br />
<br />
I deeply dislike Apple and their behaviour generally and while I understand that they're doing this only to keep developers using their App Store I still applaud them for doing the right thing, even if not for the correct reasons. </div><br />
I'd applaud them more if they weren't being so hypocritical.<br />
<br />
It seems in &quot;Apple-land&quot;, they have the right to hold patents and thus sue competing organizations where as nobody else is allowed to.<br />
<br />
I guess the key difference here is that Lodsys aren't actually competing on anything - so if I had to pick sides I would hope for Apple. However the hypocrisy is still hard to swallow.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 07:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Laurence)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: A rough translation</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?474288</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?474288</guid>
			<description>That is why I despise all patents.<br />
<br />
Nowadays they don't help at all. There was innovation before patents existed.<br />
<br />
All companies are hypocrite, all of them make use of the patent system, and all of the big players complain about it, when they lose a big case.<br />
<br />
Luckily so far in Europe we have manage to keep them away, I imagine for how long still.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 08:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (moondevil)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: A rough translation</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?474290</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?474290</guid>
			<description>What about industrial patents ? I don't know how much they last, and under which terms they work (do they imply a precise description of the patented product, like technical drawings or chemical formulas, or can you patent ideas and algorithms ? Is there a requirement of notability, or can you patent an iPod Touch's rounded corners ?)Edited 2011-05-24 09:00 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 08:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Neolander)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: A rough translation</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?474291</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?474291</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote"> Is there a requirement of notability, or can you patent an iPod Touch's rounded corners ?) </div><br />
<br />
Yes you can (I think they did), It's called a design patent. Another Idiocy as design is pretty much covered by copyright...</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 09:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (_txf_)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[6]: A rough translation</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?474313</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?474313</guid>
			<description>Actually, it's more like they patented a significant part of the casing, but although this patent makes me laugh to no end, I have to admit that it's not a pure &quot;rounded corner&quot; patent. The patent also includes things like a description of the holding springs and detailed steps of the manufacturing process, so it's not something ridiculously obvious, imprecise, and impossible to avoid.<br />
   <br />
   <a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PALL&amp;p=1&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=7688574.PN.&amp;OS=PN/7688574&amp;RS=PN/7688574" rel="nofollow">http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITO...</a> Edited 2011-05-24 12:45 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 12:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Neolander)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: A rough translation</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?474315</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?474315</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Dear Lodsys,<br />
 <br />
 Cut your crap or we'll sue you into oblivion.<br />
 <br />
 Love,<br />
 <br />
 Apple </div><br />
 <br />
 I'd love to say this were true, but thats the problem with patent trolls: <br />
 they produce nothing, they create nothing only litigation. <br />
 <br />
As far as I know, without an actual product, you have nothing to sue them over. They need to have a product that allegedly infringes on one of your patents to be able to sue them. <br />
 <br />
 The only thing one can do against patent trolls is go though the long drawn out process of trying to prove their patents are invalid.Edited 2011-05-24 12:51 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 12:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (MacMan)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: A rough translation</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?474321</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?474321</guid>
			<description>Well, what goes around comes around. Apple abuses the patent system in the exact same way as Lodsys does. Apple complaining about Lodsys' actions is incredibly hypocritical.<br />
<br />
But then, I've come to expect nothing less from technology companies, and Apple in particular.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 13:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom_Holwerda)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: A rough translation</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?474334</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?474334</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote"><br />
 I deeply dislike Apple and their behaviour generally and while I understand that they're doing this only to keep developers using their App Store I still applaud them for doing the right thing, even if not for the correct reasons. </div><br />
 <br />
 Even corporations can do bad things some of the times and good things other times. Applaud them for the good, and criticize them for the bad. In this case, Apple is doing the right thing for the right reason. <br />
<br />
Its absolutely insane to think that an application developer is liable for the functionality provided deeper inside an api. It woudl destroy third party development on any operating system that has licensed ip. Even the MIAA isn't that insane. The concept makes h264 licensing seem reasonable.Edited 2011-05-24 15:07 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 15:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Bill Shooter of Bul)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: A rough translation</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?474472</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?474472</guid>
			<description>Dear Lodsys CEO<br />
<br />
Please contact Darl McBride and find out what the wilderness looks like.<br />
<br />
Love<br />
<br />
Steve</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 05:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (clasqm)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[6]: A rough translation</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?474574</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?474574</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Yes you can (I think they did), It's called a design patent. Another Idiocy as design is pretty much covered by copyright... </div><br />
<br />
Its probably made millions for all of these inventor help companies, that cost a fortune and you just end up with a design patent worth nothing.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 15:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Bill Shooter of Bul)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
