<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25015/How_to_Lock_Down_and_Remote_Kill_a_Lost_Laptop</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:36:48 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>FileVault</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?483247</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?483247</guid>
			<description>Funny how filevault isnt even mentionned and how fail stuff like facial recognition is recommended.<br />
<br />
beside if the laptop sleep - and it most likely does, no auth will help if the attacker is good since the key is in memory and he has physical access. specially if you have firewire or lightpeak. quite a bit harder if you dont.<br />
<br />
not all that security relevant if you ask me.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 07:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (_xmv)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Great article</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?483356</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?483356</guid>
			<description>Thanks for the link to this excellent article. It summarizes an awful lot of key info in a short space. It's amazing to me how many corporations still lose critical customer data on un-encrypted laptops!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 18:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kateline)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
