<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25128/Amazon_s_Kindle_Tablet_Is_Very_Real</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:10:54 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Hopefully not just any ordinary backlit LCD...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?488252</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?488252</guid>
			<description>Something in the Kindle lineage could really use a proper transflective LCD (search on YT for pixel qi, they had few nice demonstrations). Readable everywhere, saves power when in high ambient lighting. But I won't hold my breath.<br />
<br />
Too bad it won't have Gmaps navigation... (heck, I wouldn't mind phone functionality in comparable form-factor and only somewhat higher price; such &quot;handset&quot; + BT headset would possibly eliminate any future needs for smartphone &amp; tablet duplication with many people)</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 22:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zima)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Very real disappointment</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?488253</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?488253</guid>
			<description>Android 2.1 makes it a non-starter.<br />
<br />
They may have dressed up this pig enough that it can compete with the B&amp;N Color Nook - but its not interesting to develop for, and I have no plans.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 22:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (roblearns)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Poor Nook. </title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?488254</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?488254</guid>
			<description>Wont compete against the iPad but the poor Nook might be toast. :-(</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 23:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Windows Sucks)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by flanque</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?488263</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?488263</guid>
			<description>Fail.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 23:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (flanque)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: dfgfd</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?488299</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?488299</guid>
			<description>Stupid spammer bot!</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 01:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (robojerk)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Nook Color Killer</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?488300</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?488300</guid>
			<description>It just a Nook Color Killer, and still far away from iPad challenger qualification.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Babi Asu)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>I don't get it ...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?488306</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?488306</guid>
			<description>It sounds like it is a tablet that is tightly coupled to Amazon's services.  Now that worked for Apple, but Apple is considered fashionable.  I don't think the same can be said for Amazon.  It also worked for the e-ink Kindle, but the e-ink Kindle offered compelling features.  Reflective display, battery life, free 3G, a keyboard for annotations, etc..<br />
<br />
So I really don't get why anyone would buy this new beast.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 03:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (MacTO)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>WebOS Candidate</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?488310</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?488310</guid>
			<description>Ok, I hate to keep bringing up WebOS, but I think this would be a good place for a WebOS device.  I could easily see a home for WebOS at Amazon.  However since Amazon is clearly invested in Android (Amazon App store, etc.) I know this is very unlikely...unless there is a better way to run Android apps on WebOS (IF there is a way at all).  I dont think it would be too difficult to either have Davlik on WebOS or at least an emulator, and having the device get apps from the Amazon App Store.  That would be a killer device to me if it would all be possible.<br />
<br />
Anyway, just crazy rambling ideas late at night.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 04:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (runjorel)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Is Amazon another Apple?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?488339</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?488339</guid>
			<description>Is Amazon trying to be another Apple or not?<br />
<br />
It is all depends whether they are trying to lock down the system and prevent users running &quot;unauthorised&quot; programs from running: (e.g. the stock android market app, Google maps or a free e-reader app etc). <br />
<br />
In my view they will be making a big mistake if they try and lock it down like the Kindle. But it looks like they have done a complete fork of Android and are just using Android as a quick starting point to build up there own completely separate eco system. Amazon have their own android app store which makes a lot of sense and this device is a great way of getting more users.<br />
<br />
But there is another another problem, it only runs &quot;some version of Android prior to 2.2&quot;. If they plan NEVER to upgrade this version then eventually they will be stuck in the Android dark ages with fewer tablet formatted apps able to run.<br />
<br />
I know this only aimed at non techies, but often a non techie Mum will have a techie kid who will advise on the purchase. It is surprising how much influence techies have on people making a purchase.<br />
<br />
In my view this could do very well if they allowed users to do what they like with their own purchase and allow them to run the latest and greatest Android software. I think more importantly for Amazon it could then encourage all other Android users to the Amazon market store.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (LouisBarman)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: I don't get it ...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?488344</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?488344</guid>
			<description>The thing with all things fashionable is that, like a Red Hot Chili Peppers album, they fall out of fashion. Just think of buying a laptop designed like the original iBook today -- the duller designs of Apple's earlier laptops look far more current, as do pretty much any old IBM.<br />
<br />
What Amazon's got is content, which they push extremely well, with good search and fast shipping. They're not selling this as a content delivery vehicle. With Apple, it's the other way around: the content is there to tie you into an expensive hardware upgrade cycle.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 11:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (No it isnt)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: I don't get it ...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?488365</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?488365</guid>
			<description>Pfft. Red Hot Chili Peppers are still cool. They've never gone out of style.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 15:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Bill Shooter of Bul)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Very real disappointment</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?488464</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?488464</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Android 2.1 makes it a non-starter.<br />
<br />
They may have dressed up this pig enough that it can compete with the B&amp;amp;N Color Nook - but its not interesting to develop for, and I have no plans. </div><br />
<br />
Yeah, it's probably better regarded as a fancier version of the existing Kindle - from the sound of it, their Android implementation is so modified as to have little in common with regular Android devices.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 22:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Delgarde)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Hmm no pictures</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?488534</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?488534</guid>
			<description>No pictures at all makes this very suspicious but to be honest I think any discussion about a 7&quot; Android tablet cannot exist without mentioning the AndyPad ( <a href="http://www.andypad.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.andypad.co.uk</a></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (crimperman)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
