<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25149/Newspaper_Chain_Fires_Copyright_Troll_Righthaven</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 09:25:43 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>RE: fdsgsdf</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?488941</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?488941</guid>
			<description>could someone please implement auto-ban as soon as a link to ifancyshop.com is posted?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 01:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (smashIt)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: fdsgsdf</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?488944</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?488944</guid>
			<description>Don't waste your time asking. Nobody ever seems to reply to such requests.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 02:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (darknexus)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: fdsgsdf</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?488949</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?488949</guid>
			<description>hope dies last <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 03:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (smashIt)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: fdsgsdf</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?488962</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?488962</guid>
			<description>You can try email, it always works better</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 06:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Neolander)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: fdsgsdf</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?488967</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?488967</guid>
			<description>Not sure if that would help. Remember - this is not a bot, these are REAL people making accounts. Even implementing per-comment captchas would be pointless.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom_Holwerda)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>where are the comments?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?488971</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?488971</guid>
			<description>Off Topic, I know, but it says underneath the article '5 comments', and even when I set my treshold to -5 I don't see any comments...</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Dryhte)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: where are the comments?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?488977</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?488977</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Off Topic, I know, but it says underneath the article '5 comments', and even when I set my treshold to -5 I don't see any comments... </div><br />
<br />
Don't know why, but you have to use &quot;flat view&quot;.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 10:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (frajo)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: where are the comments?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?488980</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?488980</guid>
			<description>Oh I understand, they're all replies to a deleted post. and in threaded view, if the thread has no 'root' it isn't shown. Weird. Thanks for clarifying.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 10:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Dryhte)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: where are the comments?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?488983</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?488983</guid>
			<description>I always use flat view, hadn't noticed this.<br />
<br />
In any case, we need to consider other options here. Will discuss internally.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom_Holwerda)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: where are the comments?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?489004</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?489004</guid>
			<description>No I think there is something wrong. For at least a week I've been getting false numbers of &quot;x comment(s)&quot;. For example: The &quot;SF Police Launch...&quot; article tells me it has 1 comment even though there are none.<br />
 <br />
I tested this with Firefox, Conkeror and Chromium.  Links does however tell me the right number of comments.<br />
 <br />
See screenshot...<br />
 <br />
 <a href="http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/209/201109091659481366x768s.png" rel="nofollow">http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/209/201109091659481366x768s.png</a> Edited 2011-09-09 15:13 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (righard)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: where are the comments?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?489005</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?489005</guid>
			<description>That's because that one comment was one of the spam comments. When it is removed, there's a bug in the system which makes the counter remain at 1. For any other amount, the number is properly updated.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom_Holwerda)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: fdsgsdf</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?489045</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?489045</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Not sure if that would help. Remember - this is not a bot, these are REAL people making accounts. Even implementing per-comment captchas would be pointless. </div><br />
<br />
I wouldn't go that far anyway. Start doing per-comment verification, and I doubt there'll be much life in the threads for long. Remember Yahoo webmail back when they tried that?<br />
Are we sure these are real people doing this? It seems similar to a lot of other spam bots I've encountered. Some of them are pretty advanced, even able to solve simple captchas more often than not, and I'd think that even the most idle person would have better things to do than to keep creating fake accounts just to post the same jibberish.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (darknexus)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[6]: where are the comments?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?489046</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?489046</guid>
			<description>They are not bugs, they are alternate implementation capabilities!</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (fretinator)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
