<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25161/OpenIndiana_Build_151a_Released</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:24:49 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>zfs</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?489564</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?489564</guid>
			<description>As soon as auto snapshots is fixed I will be using this to take advantage of KVM. Right now, I'll stick to Solaris 11 Express.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 19:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (dukes)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Faster</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?489570</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?489570</guid>
			<description>From the brief time I tried it it was noticeable faster.<br />
<br />
Good quality OS.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 19:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jefro)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Great news</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?489581</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?489581</guid>
			<description>For me, it is always good to see this kind of solaris news.<br />
<br />
I still use my openindiana system at home as a jack-of-all-trades server, but it has been upgraded so many times it is beginning to show its age (many devel upgrades in the last 3 years).  <br />
<br />
However, I think I'll also wait until snapshots are fixed to spend time on the upgrade.<br />
<br />
Also, why the switch to KVM?  I rather liked zones, but maybe the implementation was too difficult to maintain? Or are there actually features in KVM that people prefer?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 20:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Jondice)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by SunOS</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?489586</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?489586</guid>
			<description>Have been using OpenIndiana for my dev box for a while now and it's a very solid OS.<br />
<br />
@Jondice<br />
The KVM implentation is aimed at multi OS virtualization, zones only handle solaris branded zones currently as the lx brand was stopped. Although.. <a href="http://alexeremin.blogspot.com/2011/06/bring-back-lx-brand.html" rel="nofollow">http://alexeremin.blogspot.com/2011/06/bring-back-lx-brand.html</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 21:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (SunOS)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>(open)solaris +zfs + dtrace + kvm + zones</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?489602</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?489602</guid>
			<description>I concur with the previous comments about having kvm and zfs available in (open)solaris/illumos. I cringed when the xen/xvm development went stale after the Oracle acquisition. Looking forward to a stable solaris-based os with zfs + dtrace + kvm + zones! Thanks to Joyent for their work on the kvm port ( and their illumos-based smartos - <a href="http://smartos.org" rel="nofollow">http://smartos.org</a> ). Only wished this kvm port supported amd cpu's, maybe in the future?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ctl_alt_del)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Great news</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?489608</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?489608</guid>
			<description>KVM so that you can run Windows or Linux in a vm. Zones did not allow this.<br />
<br />
Well you could run Linux in a zone before, but only very old distributions would work.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (dukes)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Question</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?489654</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?489654</guid>
			<description>I never understood KVM.<br />
<br />
So, does this allow me to run Windows in KVM, exactly like bare bone, i.e. I get full 3D graphics and can run all games?<br />
<br />
VirtualBox 3D support is so-so. Older games works excellent like Quake2, Quake3 etc - whereas newer games doesnt really work.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 07:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kebabbert)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Bravo</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?489657</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?489657</guid>
			<description>I'll definitely install it. What I would really like to see is the integration+maintainance of the userspace Bluetooth stack.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://sites.google.com/site/anandbheemaraju/" rel="nofollow">http://sites.google.com/site/anandbheemaraju/</a></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (fithisux)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Question</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?489671</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?489671</guid>
			<description>The two things are completely separated.<br />
kvm is the virtualization technology.<br />
OpenGL (or Direct3D) is dependent on the virtualized display driver built on top of KVM, soft-Qemu or Xen.<br />
<br />
In reality, non of the currently existing virtualization technologies are capable of giving host like performance when it comes to 3D.<br />
The only possible route is using IO virtualization - giving the guest full access to the graphics card - at the price of having VT-d capable machine and supported drivers. (As far as I know, only Xen support this configuration)<br />
<br />
- Gilboa</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (gilboa)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Question</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?489672</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?489672</guid>
			<description>I think KVM does too, but I've never tried it.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Lennie)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Question</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?489694</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?489694</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">I think KVM does too, but I've never tried it. </div><br />
<br />
I know.<br />
However, as far as I remember the KVM PCI-E front/back-end support is not mainline and doesn't support VGA bypass.<br />
<br />
Hopefully by the time F16 will be released, I'll be able to test VGA bypass using both Xen and KVM <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
<br />
- Gilboa</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (gilboa)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>SmartOS and OpenIndiana</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?489797</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?489797</guid>
			<description>Does anyone know the difference between SmartOS and OpenIndiana? Are there any major differences?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 00:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (metalf8801)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: SmartOS and OpenIndiana</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?489809</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?489809</guid>
			<description>As I have understood it, SmartOS is just a minimal OS. Basically, only the kernel and KVM. Then you can virtualize client OSes and use ZFS and Zones with them. Perfect if you want Solaris features as a backend, and virtualized OSes as clients. Actually, I am considering this. Install virtualized OSes in Zones with KVM and then do all front end work in the OSes. Use StormOS as a secure backend.<br />
<br />
OpenIndiana is a full fledged distro, quite similar to Ubuntu, with Gnome, lots of software, etc.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 06:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kebabbert)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: SmartOS and OpenIndiana</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?489810</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?489810</guid>
			<description>Hmmm... It seems StormOS is debian + Illumos?<br />
<a href="http://stormos.org/node/4" rel="nofollow">http://stormos.org/node/4</a></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 07:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kebabbert)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
