<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25176/Nvidia_s_Kal-El_Tegra_To_Pack_Five_Cores</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:09:31 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Tsk</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?490148</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?490148</guid>
			<description>How quint...</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Tuxie)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>More cores =)</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?490155</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?490155</guid>
			<description>I wonder how many &quot;hidden&quot; cores they have =)<br />
Tegra2 contains 3 ARM cores(2xA9 + ARM7).<br />
Dual core OMAP5 has 4 cores (2xA15 and 2xM4)</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 23:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (viton)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: More cores =)</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?490162</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?490162</guid>
			<description>It is probably a bit hilarious with &quot;smartphone Atom&quot; from Intel. When the first version was announced, I saw a block diagram of it - showing:<br />
 <br />
 a) some fairly standard radio module from a manufacturer specialising in this, most likely with the radio stack running on an ARM core.<br />
 <br />
 b) a part mysteriously labelled ~&quot;32bit RISC&quot; in the &quot;southbridge&quot; of sorts, most likely coordinating the whole thing. ~&quot;32 bit RISC&quot; could mean just a fairly standard ARM core (why Intel would bother with anything else?)<br />
 <br />
 So it's possible that this whole &quot;push x86 everywhere&quot; Intel contraption actually has more ARM cores than x86 ones <img src="/images/emo/tongue.gif" alt=";)" />  (which is possibly also the case even with an average PC - drive controllers, DSL &quot;modem&quot;, monitor menu, ...)<br />
 Not central processing units per se... but still, would be a bit hilarious.Edited 2011-09-21 00:30 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 00:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zima)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Screw tablets</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?490219</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?490219</guid>
			<description>Screw tablets, I want this in my next laptop.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (chmeee)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Screw tablets</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?490267</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?490267</guid>
			<description>I doubt that.  It seems nvidia isn't doing very well in competing with other arm based manufacturers.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/09/asus-eee-pad-transformer-2-with-nvidia-kal-el-processor-benchmarked.html" rel="nofollow">http://liliputing.com/2011/09/asus-eee-pad-transformer-2-with-nvidi...</a><br />
<br />
Their 3d is worse than what's currently available.  Not sure about their raw cpu.  At least this one has neon (I think).</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 21:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bnolsen)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Screw tablets</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?490270</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?490270</guid>
			<description>there is so much wrong with what you said.  you need to study this.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 21:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Luminair)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: More cores =)</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?490272</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?490272</guid>
			<description>That extrapolation is hilarious indeed... given you had no data whatsoever on the details of that atom design.Edited 2011-09-21 22:09 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 22:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (tylerdurden)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Screw tablets</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?490333</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?490333</guid>
			<description>No, but AMD could put a Nano-core their next desktop CPU, or Intel could put an Atom-core in their next desktop CPU. The hard part is OS support, but hardware-wise it is pretty simple. <br />
<br />
Current desktop CPUs idle at 10-20W, the netbook CPUs uses 1-2W at full speed.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Carewolf)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: More cores =)</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?490965</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?490965</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">probably ... most likely ... mysteriously ... ~ ... could mean ... possible ... would be </div>(some emphasis added)<br />
<br />
Hm, my apologies, that was way too few hints - luckily, you were here, able to figure out on your own how it's not exactly a certain info...<br />
<br />
(but also not far-fetched, not quite &quot;no data whatsoever&quot;; with stacks of radio modules typically running on some ARM - Intel outright buying out Infineon team providing also their radio chipsets wouldn't change that - strongly hinting to at least equal number of x86 and ARM cores ...also, ~&quot;32bit RISC&quot; label was curiously vague, on an Intel presentation slide)</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 23:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zima)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
