<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25206/Smart_Cities_Get_Their_Own_Operating_System</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 13:43:48 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Not an operating system</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?491695</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?491695</guid>
			<description>Seriously, this is not even close to an operating system. Who markets this kind of stuff? It makes me so mad...</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 21:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Sodki)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Not an operating system</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?491757</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?491757</guid>
			<description>No - it _is_ an Operating System, we're just used to looking at it at a different level of abstraction. Contrast the many levels of abstraction between the early operating systems and modern ones. This has fewer. <br />
<br />
... lets hope that they pick an OS that has a proven track record of running stably and reliably. Such as the distro that runs the Nasdaq <img src="/images/emo/tongue.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 08:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (JamesBroadhead)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Not an operating system</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?492231</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?492231</guid>
			<description>Perhaps it's better to be happy with the name - what would you prefer, that or &quot;city cloud&quot;? (&quot;fog&quot;?)<br />
<br />
As for the general idea... for this to make proper sense, it would probably be advisable for us to get over the abomination of suburban sprawl.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 06:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zima)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
