<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25336/Open_Source_Biometrics_Technology</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:02:36 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Biometrics are over-used</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?497376</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?497376</guid>
			<description>In the US it's only a matter of time before everybody wants your fingerprint. McDonald's uses them for employee check-in; my local library uses them for PC access. They always tell you it's ok because they mathematically convert it into &quot;templates.&quot;<br />
<br />
But what happens when a company looses your fingerprint template or allows it to be stolen? Are they going to give you a new finger?<br />
<br />
As always, the individual pays the price, while the company skips away from any responsibility.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (benali72)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Biometrics are over-used</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?497383</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?497383</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">But what happens when a company looses your fingerprint template or allows it to be stolen? Are they going to give you a new finger? </div><br />
It's probably a safe assumption that they'll fall back to more traditional means of identity confirmation.<br />
<br />
<div class="cquote">As always, the individual pays the price, while the company skips away from any responsibility. </div><br />
How exactly would you be paying the price?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ilovebeer)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Biometrics are over-used</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?497394</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?497394</guid>
			<description>benaili72,<br />
<br />
Yeah, this is a long known problem with the technology. The sad thing is that even the most obvious ways to defeat the technology do work.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.slideshare.net/anivar/biometrics-vulnerabilities-exploits" rel="nofollow">http://www.slideshare.net/anivar/biometrics-vulnerabilities-exploit...</a><br />
<br />
Even mythbusters got in on it and managed to crack some production devices. The concept of biometric copying/theft has even made it's way into fiction (Angels &amp; Demons, Gattaca). <br />
<br />
Anyone remember when a group copied the German Minister's fingerprints because he was pushing for biometrics so strongly?<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/30/german_interior_minister_fingerprint_appropriated/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/30/german_interior_minister_fi...</a><br />
<br />
<br />
I'm not against (elective) biometrics, but anyone implementing them should not oversell their security. Using biometrics on a supervised cash register is ok, using them on a locked safe/atm is probably not.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Alfman)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Direct linkt to the tech</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?497497</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?497497</guid>
			<description><a href="http://digitalpersona.com/fingerjetfx/" rel="nofollow">http://digitalpersona.com/fingerjetfx/</a></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (JAlexoid)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Biometrics are over-used</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?497536</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?497536</guid>
			<description>Biometrics works if you know how to use them. It can be summed up in:<br />
Biometrics are good to verify that you are who you say you are. They're not good for identifying who you are.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Soulbender)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
