<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25640/DragonFly_BSD_3_0_released</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:04:27 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>TrueCrypt-compatible disk encryption</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?508145</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?508145</guid>
			<description>Really cool!<br />
I really hope someone ports the BSD-licensend truecrypt code over to Linux/other BSDs. The Truecrypt license is not OSI-compliant and therefor Truecrypt is nearly always an extra install. I would love to see it end up in my favorite distro (and before you ask, I don't have the time to port it)</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kragil)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: TrueCrypt-compatible disk encryption</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?508177</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?508177</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Really cool!<br />
I really hope someone ports the BSD-licensend truecrypt code over to Linux/other BSDs. The Truecrypt license is not OSI-compliant and therefor Truecrypt is nearly always an extra install. I would love to see it end up in my favorite distro (and before you ask, I don't have the time to port it) </div><br />
<br />
I'm not trying to start a flame or anything, however, have you considered just using DragonflyBSD &amp; running all of your Linux apps in BSD's Linux compatibility layer? It might be a bit easier and faster than waiting for someone to port TrueCrypt.....IJS</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (demetrioussharpe)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Kudos</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?508180</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?508180</guid>
			<description>Kudos to Matt Dillon and his amazing team.<br />
 <br />
 No blaming anyone here, but I perceive DragonflyBSD being one of the most (maybe the only one) really active BSD OSes out there.Edited 2012-02-23 02:12 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 02:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ebasconp)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: TrueCrypt-compatible disk encryption</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?508238</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?508238</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Really cool!<br />
I really hope someone ports the BSD-licensend truecrypt code over to Linux/other BSDs. </div><br />
It's been ported to Linux. It's even packaged in Fedora (yum install tcplay).</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zanko)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Kudos</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?508249</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?508249</guid>
			<description>At the moment, DragonFly has the most interesting development, but in terms developer activity, they're not number one.  DragonFly is less active than the big 3 and certainly more active than my BSD project or MirBSD due to resource differences. <br />
<br />
DragonFly is doing one thing right, they've got a few people focused on new features and a few people to do the grunt work.  The latter allow Matt to focus on HAMMER and SMP work.  I can tell you that most of my time is spent just trying to keep up on hardware support, contrib software and ports.  It's hard to innovate and we've really only done it with our package system so far.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (laffer1)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Kudos</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?508272</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?508272</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote"> No blaming anyone here, but I perceive DragonflyBSD being one of the most (maybe the only one) really active BSD OSes out there. </div><br />
<br />
Funny, my perception is the opposite.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (tylerdurden)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
