<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/25989/Windows_8_s_new_startup_repair_options_detailed</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:49:14 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>What about the other keys?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?519210</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?519210</guid>
			<description>Only semi-related to the matter but I want to ask about it anyway... What happened to the spacebar and meta-key (&quot;windows&quot;-key for you others)? Vista's solution for not being able to detect F8 was to use spacebar since it's detection was much more reliable on wider range of systems. And Microsoft boasted the meta-key for Windows 8 even few months ago still. Now they're doing that menu thing which has it's good sides and probably a welcome change in itself for many.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/windowsvistanow/archive/2008/12/05/the-space-bar-is-the-new-f8-when-it-comes-to-vista-and-server-2008-boot-options.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/windowsvistanow/archive/2008/12/05/the-spac...</a></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 00:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (AnXa)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Nice language, dickheads.</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?519213</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?519213</guid>
			<description>From the boot option screen pictured in TFA:<br />
<div class="cquote"><i><b>Use another operating system:</b><br />
Continue with another installed version of Windows.</i> </div><br />
I see Microsoft still wants you to think that *they* produce the only operating systems in the world.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 00:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (UltraZelda64)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Nice language, dickheads.</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?519227</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?519227</guid>
			<description>It is the majority (and supported) case, and their loader only detects other Windows installations. Non-Windows OSes would need to be added manually to BCD.Edited 2012-05-24 04:46 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 04:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (n4cer)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Superfast boot - until...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?519234</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?519234</guid>
			<description>your favourite OEM adds all the crapware to the install. Then it will take an age (relatively) to boot. Ample time to hit a few keys to interrupt it.<br />
<br />
But really, in the grand scheme of things, what is a few seconds(say 5) where a message on the screen says 'Press F8 to interrupt this boot'.<br />
<br />
This is the wrong answer to a question that has yet to be asked (IMHO)</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 05:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (shotsman)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Superfast boot - until...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?519236</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?519236</guid>
			<description>That still assumes that things will go wrong in a sufficiently high number. In the majority or use cases that is not or will no longer be the case, because of many self-healing improvements in Windows 8 and an improvement in general stability.<br />
<br />
Still, there will be use cases â" albeit a very, very small minority â" that do need the boot menu, and for those there is still this possibility.<br />
<br />
On the topic of OEMs adding slow programs, it wouldn't surprise me if Microsoft were to be disallowing this, for the sake of speed. But that is a speculation.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 06:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (harmhilvers)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>press on startup</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?519241</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?519241</guid>
			<description>I get that the startup process is so quick that there's not much to be gained from flashing up a press F8 to blah blah, but i would have thought an extra handy option might be to press and hold a button on startup / switch on, they are already working with the BIOS/UFEI operators .</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 08:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (REM2000)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: press on startup</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?519252</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?519252</guid>
			<description>and with a 8 second bootup there is enough time to tell the user to press whatever key during startup<br />
<br />
but i guess an animated windows-logo is more important...</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 09:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (smashIt)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Nice language, dickheads.</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?519259</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?519259</guid>
			<description>With 90+ % I don't see a reason why not. Considering Linux sits well under 1% and MacBooks being different beast....</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Wafflez)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by nutt</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?519260</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?519260</guid>
			<description>How can this be a problem?  Just hold something down while powering on.  It's worked on Amigas and Macs for decades, why shouldn't a PC be able to do the same trick?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (nutt)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Comment by nutt</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?519295</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?519295</guid>
			<description>Some keyboards are too stupid to detect if a key is pressed when they're powered on. I verified this myself years ago in an electronics project, but they were all AT/PS2 keyboards (12+ years ago). Perhaps USB keyboards are smarter, who knows...</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (biffuz)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: What about the other keys?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?519301</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?519301</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">What happened to the spacebar and meta-key (&quot;windows&quot;-key for you others)? </div><br />
  <br />
  Meta = Alt, Super = Windows.<br />
  <br />
  I can't really see why they are not detecting a pressed key while booting (modifier keys). It doesn't slow anything.<br />
<br />
Edit: probably has to do with the fact that Windows 8 is targeting non keyboard devices, like tablets.Edited 2012-05-24 17:24 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 17:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sbenitezb)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Nice language, dickheads.</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?519323</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?519323</guid>
			<description>The language used will make people *think* that the only other operating systems out there are... Windows.  As if most people didn't already think that.  And, of course, there is only ONE official provider/licensor of Windows operating systems.  Just an extension of their monopoly, which apparently even they believe they have according to their wording.  Well, I guess the wording really *will* be true on all ARM machines that come with Windows 8... since to be certified for Windows 8, they must disallow the computer itself from ever booting any other OS, even if the computer owner wants to, unless it is blessed by Thy Almighty Microsoft's Sacred Key.  Linux?  BSD?  Solaris?  Haiku?  MINIX?  ReactOS?  Syllable?  Nope, move along--only Windows can play within these walled playgrounds.<br />
<br />
Windows 8 is reeking more of vendor lock-in than any version of Windows before it.Edited 2012-05-24 22:15 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 22:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (UltraZelda64)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: What about the other keys?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?519390</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?519390</guid>
			<description>Holding something pressed on powerup should work fine on tablets as well, just place your thumb firmly on one of the four corners and power it on.  Each corner could have a different function.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 09:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (nutt)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Nice language, dickheads.</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?519562</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?519562</guid>
			<description>As well-known as Mac OS/iOS, and Android are, anybody interested in booting another OS (and many who aren't) know there are more OSes than Windows available.<br />
<br />
It's a niche use case for which most consumers have no interest. For those that need the capability, they already know there are more options than Windows, and as far as MS' role, they are only going to officially support their OSes.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 11:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (n4cer)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
