<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/26060/Magenta_implements_Darwin_BSD_on_top_of_the_Linux_kernel</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:00:59 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Darwin kernel anyone?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521584</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521584</guid>
			<description>Where is Puredarwin?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (fithisux)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>not that i fully understand the amount of work</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521591</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521591</guid>
			<description>now this is news for osnews</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lazar)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>What for?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521592</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521592</guid>
			<description>The article mentions (repeated) what the project isn't designed to do, but I was curious as to what the goal of the project was. I mean, why create a software stack compatible with iPhone 1.0? The project page has this to say:<br />
<br />
&quot;This is a very weird project. You may ask, why am I doing this? The answer is: no f*cking idea <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> &quot;<br />
<br />
I think coding for coding's sake is awesome. That's great. But I guess I'm surprised someone went to all this trouble without a goal in mind.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jessesmith)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Confused. Help!!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521593</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521593</guid>
			<description>It's all a bit beyond my level of understanding. Doesn't Darwin already have a kernel (XNU/Mach + BSD bits &amp; bobs)? So here we're having a kernel on top of another kernel? Or is it just a BSD userland on top of a Linux kernel? Or are we talking about multiple userlands here? O_o?<br />
<br />
Can someone explain this to me, preferably in grandma-friendly lingo?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (gan17)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by foregam</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521594</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521594</guid>
			<description>Binary compatible â  using the same binary format. You need ABI compliance too.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (foregam)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Confused. Help!!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521595</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521595</guid>
			<description>I thought Drawing is a kernel (based on March+BSD).</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (panzi)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Confused. Help!!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521596</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521596</guid>
			<description>That's what I thought as well. I mean, that's what uname says I have on my Mac. <br />
<br />
But then I wanted to make sure before I posted, so I checked: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_%28operating_system%29#Kernel" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_%28operating_system%29#...</a><br />
<br />
...and Now I'm even more confuzed, obviously.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (gan17)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by Nicholas Blachford</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521597</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521597</guid>
			<description>Who needs BSD when you can have LSD!</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Nicholas Blachford)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Almost the reverse of Debian/kFreeBSD</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521609</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521609</guid>
			<description>This seems to be like the reverse of Debian/kFreeBSD, which is the Debian userland on top of the FreeBSD kernel.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (obsidian)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Confused. Help!!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521617</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521617</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">It's all a bit beyond my level of understanding. Doesn't Darwin already have a kernel (XNU/Mach + BSD bits &amp;amp; bobs)? So here we're having a kernel on top of another kernel? Or is it just a BSD userland on top of a Linux kernel? </div><br />
<br />
From my understanding, what she's doing is implementing some of Darwin's interfaces and capabilities on Linux. With that you have the kernel. The userland comes from Darwin/BSD.<br />
<br />
I wonder if GNUstep's libraries can be used to fill some gaps...</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Sodki)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Almost the reverse of Debian/kFreeBSD</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521619</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521619</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">This seems to be like the reverse of Debian/kFreeBSD, which is the Debian userland on top of the FreeBSD kernel. </div><br />
 <br />
 This seems to be more than that. Debian/kFreeBSD is &quot;just&quot; Debian on top of kFreeBSD, without significant changes. For example, systemd cannot be used on Debian/kFreeBSD right now because kFreeBSD is missing some stuff that Linux has. A good analogy would be to port those things to kFreeBSD in order for systemd to work, for example. That's why Magenta (at least for me) looks much harder to accomplish.Edited 2012-06-11 23:30 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Sodki)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by Stephen!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521621</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521621</guid>
			<description>It's not her intention to allow iOS applications to run, but could it anyway?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Stephen!)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: What for?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521635</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521635</guid>
			<description>Ok, that's probably the worlds' best reason why to do anything. As such, I'll cut her some slack. I personally dislike darwin/bsd userland, but admire the kernel.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 01:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Bill Shooter of Bul)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Confused. Help!!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521647</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521647</guid>
			<description>Why are you confused?<br />
<br />
Darwin is the OS with XNU as kernel.<br />
<br />
OS X is Darwin + more.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 03:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (aliquis)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Comment by Stephen!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521648</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521648</guid>
			<description>If you implement it all I guess so.<br />
<br />
If you steal the parts needed maybe? =P</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 03:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (aliquis)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Comment by Stephen!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521649</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521649</guid>
			<description>Hmm. I was going to say &quot;absolutely not&quot; but it looks like that may be intended. Not sure.<br />
<br />
I like this idea though! IMO one of the real problems with the GNU/Linux userland is lack of cohesiveness on the command line - it's just a bunch of stuff thrown together, and not everything works with everything else. Mounting as user on the CLI is a mess, power management is a kludge, managing WPA connections is hugely inconvenient and unintuitive... Having a better integrated CLI environment, as with the BSDs (especially OpenBSD), would be a massive improvement.<br />
<br />
OTOH, I have to ask, why not just make a Darwin/XNU distribution?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 03:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Gullible Jones)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: What for?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521659</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521659</guid>
			<description>Kernel of this project or of darwin/bsd? ;p Assuming the latter - isn't it some weird mix of Mach and BSD, despite hybridization still with not too stellar performance? (or maybe this bit, that I recall, was just something about the archaic Mac file system)Edited 2012-06-12 05:56 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 05:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zima)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Comment by Stephen!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521674</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521674</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">OTOH, I have to ask, why not just make a Darwin/XNU distribution? </div><br />
<br />
My guess would be for hardware compatibility. Darwin's kernel is nice, but still has limited driver support. As far as I know, kexts designed for OS X (similar to loaded kernel modules on Linux but more powerful) can't be loaded on straight Darwin due to their integration with a lot of the OS X API stack. By using the Linux kernel, you'd get more hardware compatibility problems out of the way and free up time to concentrate specifically on the userland. Just my suspician.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (darknexus)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: What for?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521696</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521696</guid>
			<description>I admire the FreeBSD kernel, always have. I never around to looking at the Darwin kernel. Linux isn't badly designed, IMHO, but it was the second one I really dug into.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Bill Shooter of Bul)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: What for?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521862</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521862</guid>
			<description>So what would you think about this guy: <a href="http://dabeaz.blogspot.com/2011/01/porting-py65-and-my-superboard-to.html" rel="nofollow">http://dabeaz.blogspot.com/2011/01/porting-py65-and-my-superboard-t...</a> ? Emulator of 30 years old machine, &quot;modem&quot; for connecting sound card and Superboard, storing instances of Superboard (essentially MS Basic) on the net.<br />
<br />
Sometimes people has useless ideas. But if they are porting several Python2 modules to Python3 in the process, let them have it. THEY ARE AWESOME. I'll bet that ios project will provide at least some patches for the Linux kernel.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 11:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (SeeM)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>This just caught my attention</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521885</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521885</guid>
			<description>Green logotype<br />
<br />
Word 'Magenta'<br />
<br />
... <img src="/images/emo/grin.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (aliquis)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: What for?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521909</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521909</guid>
			<description>Unstable ABI!!<br />
<br />
<a href="http://omgcheesecake.net/index.php?/topic/2550-linus-rants-about-gnome-3/page__p__39843#entry39843" rel="nofollow">http://omgcheesecake.net/index.php?/topic/2550-linus-rants-about-gn...</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lucas_maximus)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Confused. Help!!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521915</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521915</guid>
			<description>I think It's more like Haiku, which is binary compatible with BeOS on top of NewOS kernel. It's not the same, though</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Speaktrap)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Interesting but</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?521942</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?521942</guid>
			<description>Incredibly stupid.<br />
<br />
Sorry, there is OS News, then there is OS News that has hokey news in it.<br />
<br />
-Hack</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (hackus)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
