<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/26158/Interview_RIM_CEO_Thorsten_Heins</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:04:33 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Love the Playbook!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?525680</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?525680</guid>
			<description>Posting this with my playbook which I just love! I am also really interested in seeing BB10-devices.... Too bad RIM is taking such a beating at the moment. While I'm not sure delaying it further is a good thing it needs to be better executed than the Playbook launch where many core apps such as calendar and email were missing.<br />
<br />
QNX is such a good OS and I would hate to see it sink with RIM...</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 22:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (warhoon)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Love the Playbook!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?525687</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?525687</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">...my playbook which I just love!... </div><br />
<br />
I second that!  I have owned an iPad and a Playbook and I can honestly say that I like my playbook better.  Also, QNX is an absolutely fantastic OS and I can only imagine that BBOS10 will be just as good as PBOS2 if not better.  I'm not crazy about waiting longer but I'm sure it will be great.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 23:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (brewmastre)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RIM bought TAT a while back</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?525718</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?525718</guid>
			<description>I'm very interested in the changes they brought to the UI.<br />
<br />
 <a href="http://www.tat.se/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tat.se/</a></description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 01:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ronaldst)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>I hope you will like BB10</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?525731</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?525731</guid>
			<description>While I can't comment on its status, I hope people will like what BlackBerry 10 will be.<br />
<br />
:)</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 05:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ShawnX)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Waiting</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?525737</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?525737</guid>
			<description>I considered upgrading my 9700 to a Samsung phone recently. But I've decided to hold off until BB10 and give BB one more chance. I have always loved their phones. Good build quality, good call reception.Edited 2012-07-07 07:51 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 07:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (dnstest)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Love the Playbook!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?525844</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?525844</guid>
			<description>OS can be great but unfortunately it has very few apps developed for it. And RIM is almost dead. I hope either RIM will restore to the previous success or they opn source or sell the os if they go bankrupt.<br />
<br />
I don't know how BB OS is but I used good old QNX on the desktop for a few weeks, few years ago, and it felt great.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (twitterfire)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: RIM bought TAT a while back</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?526703</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?526703</guid>
			<description>Don't get too hopeful with that. TAT was responsible for the look &amp; feel of SE A100 and A200 platforms (search their names on <a href="http://www.mobile-review.com/review-en.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.mobile-review.com/review-en.shtml</a> - and also G502 for example), and of some other &quot;feature phone&quot; ones from LG or Samsung IIRC. <br />
 And while quite decent, they weren't particularly remarkable, here and there even chaotic a bit - so it's hard to tell if their big effort will be great or so-so.Edited 2012-07-13 22:28 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 22:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zima)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
