<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/26265/QNX_Neutrino_OS_6_5_SP1_released</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:32:57 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Gosh I used to like QNX</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?530617</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?530617</guid>
			<description>Wait a minute. We still run QNX4.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jefro)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Gosh I used to like QNX</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?530639</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?530639</guid>
			<description>aaah, memories. I used to use QNX4 boot floppies on a 386... I miss that box.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 00:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (helf)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Gosh I used to like QNX</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?530641</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?530641</guid>
			<description>That famous Demo disk they made available in the late 90s ('97, I think) changed the way I looked at OSes for a long time. I too ran QNX on a 40mhz 386 and always hoped they hit the consumer market more strongly. QNX is really the main reason I still follow Blackberry.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 00:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (PaxD75)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Gosh I used to like QNX</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?530655</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?530655</guid>
			<description>I think QNX is too widely used in the industry to disappear, even if Blackberry goes down, some other company will pick it up.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (moondevil)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Gosh I used to like QNX</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?530658</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?530658</guid>
			<description>I used to have a copy of that disk. I think I still might somewhere. Time to dig it out!!</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (henderson101)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Qt</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?530662</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?530662</guid>
			<description>One thing that has already trickled down from BlackBerry10 is first class support for Qt (4 and 5).<br />
<br />
The people working on Qt-on-QNX are even committed to becoming a Tier 1 platform for Qt, i.e. officially on the same level as Windows, Linux and OS X.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 10:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (anda_skoa)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Gosh I used to like QNX</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?530752</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?530752</guid>
			<description><a href="http://qnx.projektas.lt/qnxdemo/qnx_demo_disk.htm" rel="nofollow">http://qnx.projektas.lt/qnxdemo/qnx_demo_disk.htm</a>  nowadays, typically most likely faster than digging out <i>any</i> floppy <img src="/images/emo/tongue.gif" alt=";)" />  <br />
<br />
PS. Curious, IOS is based on QNX.Edited 2012-08-11 19:35 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 19:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zima)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: Gosh I used to like QNX</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?530925</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?530925</guid>
			<description>edit: Ah, IOS and not iOS. Automatic mental typo filtering isn't always a good thing.<br />
<br />
Which makes it a good point: In the worst case, cisco will probably buy QNX just to keep it going. Not the best of fates, but probably better than outright dying.Edited 2012-08-13 10:37 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (dnebdal)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[6]: Gosh I used to like QNX</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?531438</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?531438</guid>
			<description>Well, it's also the fault of the company that basically takes any name they like, cleans up only after the fact (like it was also with the iPhone IIRC)<br />
<br />
And I imagine that, for codebase of such importance (used not only in a fairly crucial line of ~switches, also automotive usage or with... Canadian nuclear reactors), buying of QNX per se wouldn't even be required - the code is certainly in escrow, with arrangements made a long time ago for ownership transfer, were something to happen with its parent company.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 23:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zima)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
