<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/26477/Android_4_2_alpha_contains_SELinux</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:05:28 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comment by ssokolow</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?538942</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?538942</guid>
			<description>As long as keeping control of your own device can be implemented in a manner that's as widely-implemented as the non-market APKs toggle, I'd welcome SELinux on end-user Android phones.<br />
<br />
 Maybe we can finally get general opinion of SELinux turned around by first building an ecosystem of tools, tutorials, and developers on a platform already used to permission-based whitelisting.<br />
 <br />
 (Not to mention, SELinux would complement Android permissions well. From what I remember, they're less granular than SELinux in the areas SELinux is designed to deal with.)<br />
 <br />
 Either way, we definitely need more SELinux adoption. Whitelist-based security is the most powerful part of firewalling and something similar for code execution in non-toy applications is long overdue.Edited 2012-10-18 03:31 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 03:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ssokolow)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comments disabled after 5 days</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?538946</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?538946</guid>
			<description>I was going to comment in the Ubuntu donations article from 8 days ago but it is now archived and I can't comment <img src="/images/emo/sad.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
<br />
I also don't like how I can't upvote stuff in a thread I decided to comment in. Just because I decided to make my own comment doesn't mean other people don't also have valid points worth an upvote.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 06:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Priest)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Comments disabled after 5 days</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?538947</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?538947</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">I also don't like how I can't upvote stuff in a thread I decided to comment in. Just because I decided to make my own comment doesn't mean other people don't also have valid points worth an upvote. </div><br />
<br />
It's to stop people voting up or down things that agree or disagree with them. We all like to think everyone is even handed, but it's not true.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 06:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kwan_e)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Comments disabled after 5 days</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?538968</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?538968</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">I also don't like how I can't upvote stuff in a thread I decided to comment in. Just because I decided to make my own comment doesn't mean other people don't also have valid points worth an upvote. </div><br />
<br />
Same, but I accept their decision. I usually skim the comments, vote for any, and then comment.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Beta)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Precursor to</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?538974</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?538974</guid>
			<description>Despite Tom's disclaimer I still thing at least LG is eventually determined to block root.  I doubt that'd be a Google decision, though it certainly could be.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Drunkula)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
