<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/26528/Microsoft_Office_for_iOS_Android_revealed</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:15:36 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Finally</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?541255</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?541255</guid>
			<description>My long held vision of using my Nokia N800 as a desktop might finally come true: Samsung Note II + Jelly Bean + Office 365!<br />
<br />
Too bad I had to wait long enough to realize that laptops are way better.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (earksiinni)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Subscription required for editing...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?541256</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?541256</guid>
			<description>I knew that had to be the only way MS would do this. Their phone isn't going to capture market share overnight nor will the Windows tablet like things take over the tablet market. If they aren't careful someone else will take over the office app category for those devices, with the possibility to then spread to the desktop. <br />
<br />
I still can't understand why libre/open office hasn't tried to fill that gap.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Bill Shooter of Bul)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Subscription required for editing...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?541259</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?541259</guid>
			<description>Because OOo's build system was really messed up and LibreOffice inherited it.  You can only compile natively, no cross-compilations.  I should know, I tried to compile OOo for Maemo back in the day and switched to AbiWord once I learned this wasn't possible (see first thread in the comments for this article).<br />
<br />
If LibreOffice hasn't fixed that yet, the very good question remains: why?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (earksiinni)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Subscription required for editing...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?541262</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?541262</guid>
			<description>Because coding on Office clones for free is a rather boring way to spend your life I suspect.<br />
<br />
The best software is written when the developers are filling a need they themselves have, but anyone who needs an Office suite can go out and buy Office. If LibreOffice comes up with some more innovative plan than being like Office, but free, and a bit more 2003, I doubt it will actually go anywhere without a lot of money to pay developers to work on it.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (vaette)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Subscription required for editing...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?541263</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?541263</guid>
			<description>Well, I had a very real need to have a fully-fledged word processor on my Nokia N800 (see first thread in the comments for this article), which is what drove me to OOo and then AbiWord in the first place.  Assuming that the build system hasn't been fixed yet, I'm surprised that there hasn't been a critical mass of OSS devs who have a similar need for their Android/iOS devices and haven't fixed the system accordingly yet.  Or maybe that mass exists but the build system is broken beyond repair.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (earksiinni)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Am I missing something here?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?541288</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?541288</guid>
			<description>OK, &quot;viewing documents on the move&quot; is a little far-fetched when you need an active Net connection to do so. You also have to pay a subscription to edit docs too!<br />
 <br />
 So how is this better than the free/cheap Office document viewers/editors that are already out there on Android/iOS? Heck, I've already got two of them from Amazon UK's Free App of the Day (Smart Office 2 and OfficeSuite Professional 6)...Edited 2012-11-07 19:39 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 19:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (rklrkl)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Am I missing something here?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?541291</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?541291</guid>
			<description>Better in the lines of Microsoft's view point and interests - and for business' wanting software that, you would think or wish, should have no issues at all working with Office Docs.<br />
<br />
But as a general consumer that have options like the free Kingsoft Office mobile app and what you've mentioned above, who just wants to be able to read some documents or make an occassional document, not much there really.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 20:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (grumpyoldman)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Subscription required for editing...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?541296</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?541296</guid>
			<description>They were working on something like that at the beginning of the year, don't know how the port has progressed since though.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://arstechnica.com/business/2012/02/libreoffice-developer-shows-prototype-android-and-html5-ports/" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/business/2012/02/libreoffice-developer-shows...</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 20:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Neolander)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Can't wait to....</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?541311</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?541311</guid>
			<description>&quot;Yes, let's pay that monthly subscription so that I can finally use my 4 inch smartphone to write 300-pages report with tables, graphics, footnotes and styles&quot; <br />
 <br />
 .... said no one<br />
<br />
Whose need does this fulfil, apart from Microsoft shareholders'?Edited 2012-11-07 22:38 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (PieterGen)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Subscription required for editing...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?541315</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?541315</guid>
			<description>Microsoft is in an difficult position, for years they preached that the general public NEEDED MSOffice and Outlook on their computers. But the public decided otherwise and bought iPads, Macs and Android devices. Hundreds of milions of them, all without those &quot;essential&quot; Microsoft programs...and they found out they didn't need them.<br />
<br />
So, here comes plan B...sell Office to Android and iOS users...who have lived happily without MSOffice, why would they need out now?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (PieterGen)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>But Why?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?541322</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?541322</guid>
			<description>Why do we need that afterall?  My experience has told me that people who still stuck with MS Office nowadays are either a) slaved to use it, or b) incompetent to move on.Edited 2012-11-08 00:55 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (shinkou)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Just what every user wants&amp;acirc;€&amp;brvbar;</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?541327</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?541327</guid>
			<description>Yes, Microsoft, please give us all another bill. That's what we all want. We beg for it. <br />
I can't help but think, each time I hear an announcement from Microsoft, that they keep losing just a bit more touch with reality as the days go by. This would benefit no one save Microsoft's shareholders and, if people don't go for it, not even them. The only market for this type of system might, and I do repeat might, be large businesses where the company pays for x amount of accounts and they are used on the company's machines or tablets. Home users though? Forget it. Microsoft missed the boat on the home tablets, and they sure won't reclaim most of them with a subscription system.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 01:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (darknexus)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>An account just to read a Word doc?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?541333</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?541333</guid>
			<description>An account just to read a Word doc? Baloney.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 02:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (benali72)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by kaiwai</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?541400</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?541400</guid>
			<description>Could someone inform me how another rumour confirms the existence of something? do people actually read the article linked because it is quite clear what the article said in the first paragraph:<br />
<br />
<div class="cquote">The Verge has learned through several sources close to Microsoft's plans that the company will release Office versions for Android and iOS in early 2013. </div><br />
<br />
That isn't confirmation, that is rumour - confirmation would be Microsoft themselves coming out and announcing it formally.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kaiwai)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Can't wait to....</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?541498</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?541498</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">&quot;Yes, let's pay that monthly subscription so that I can finally use my 4 inch smartphone to write 300-pages report with tables, graphics, footnotes and styles&quot; <br />
 <br />
 .... said no one<br />
<br />
Whose need does this fulfil, apart from Microsoft shareholders'? </div><br />
<br />
If there are folks out there who want productivity software that's governed by cell carrier-style contracts (complete with minimum terms of 1 year &amp; early termination penalties), then Office 365 is a <i>great</i> choice.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (StephenBeDoper)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
