<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/26596/China_s_mini_Apple_takes_slice_of_smartphone_pie</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 09:07:22 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>business model</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?544614</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?544614</guid>
			<description>What is especially interesting about this company is their business model. <br />
<br />
They modify Android with specific partner services to generate revenue from those services rather than from the sales of the hardware itself. <br />
<br />
So they get a cut from the sale of whatever product you buy using the bundled shopping, the media you buy on the bundled media app, and so on. <br />
<br />
It's essentially the same model is using with the Kindle.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kristoph)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Apple 2: Electric Boogaloo?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?544617</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?544617</guid>
			<description>Great, just what we needed - <i>another </i>Apple. Oh well, just as long as they don't start trying to sue people over basic geometric shapes.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (BallmerKnowsBest)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Asian</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?544679</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?544679</guid>
			<description>Just to point this out and as a bit of Language usage trivia for Thom.. to a British English speaker, &quot;Asian&quot; means &quot;from the sub continent of India and surrounding associated territories, (incl. Pakistan, Bangladesh, Goa, Sri Lanka and Kashmir.)&quot; We'd never normally use &quot;Asian&quot; to mean Korean, Chinese or Japanese. We'd either qualify it with &quot;South East Asian&quot;, use a more specific term like &quot;Oriental&quot; or use a less accurate term such as &quot;Chinese&quot;. I think it's only the Australians and North Americans that use the term Asian to always mean &quot;Oriental&quot;. We have always had a greater affinity to India (yeah, let's not dwell on why) and there are a lot more Asian's (our usage) in the UK than Asians (US usage), and there is a stronger cultural influence on the UK from India than the far East (though some would argue the toss over how much.)Edited 2012-12-11 10:54 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (henderson101)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Asian</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?544690</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?544690</guid>
			<description>Being Asian, and American, we tend to use it speaking as a Continent.  Like Europe, Asia, Africa, etc.  We differentiate just as the British, however, I'd say we tend more toward continents vs regions.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kancept)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: business model</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?544694</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?544694</guid>
			<description>I thought they just used MIUI as their UI, but after a quick googling, I saw that they developed MIUI, which uses Cyanogen at its core, and later made available to the public to translate and port to other devices. Very interesting. I would love if any Android OEM would use Cyanogen as their stock android OS.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (franksands)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: business model</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?544752</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?544752</guid>
			<description><b><i>kristoph</b> suggested...</i><br />
<div class="cquote">What is especially interesting about this company is their business model. <br />
<br />
They modify Android with specific partner services to generate revenue from those services rather than from the sales of the hardware itself. <br />
<br />
So they get a cut from the sale of whatever product you buy using the bundled shopping, the media you buy on the bundled media app, and so on. <br />
<br />
It's essentially the same model is using with the Kindle. </div><br />
<br />
And it seems to be the same system being used by HTC on their phones (htcapps) and also by SONY on their Xperia Play phone with its PlayStation Mobile store.<br />
<br />
As cool as Xiaomi's MIUI offering is, let's not think that they're doing anything particularly new.  Everyone has their hands out these days...<br />
<br />
Bundled shopping is the IE browser bar of the '10s...<br />
<br />
--bornagainpenguin</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bornagainenguin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
