So Rebol 3.0 ALPHA is now open source. But why dont they make Rebol 2.x opern source? Because Rebol 2 is in a useable state.

you have absolute zero Rebol or even technical related knowledge

I am really fed-up with your reactions

and it has a software development environment that's easier than many others

I ported Mesa two years ago or so, it's in Syllable 0.6.7. Vanders never promised wifi, we merely discussed it. The rest of your "info" is also misinformation.

Well, wifi was not only discussed it was intended in 2007 as a x-mas present for 2008, or something like that.

You're delusional. But of course, you want to be.

it was not, and I never made any such "promise" or even vague hints.

At the start of 2005, some of you may recall that I made a New Years Resolution. I said that I would be using Syllable full time, as my primary Operating System, by the end of the year. Sadly, I havn't quite managed it.
......
However, I am confident that I'll be able to make the switch within the next few months.

In your head, yes. But that's exactly what programming is: rearranging thoughts all the time.
Many of the people who use REBOL have strong math backgrounds. They're not hindered by REBOL's precedence rules. In fact, REBOL has a math-like elegance to it.

I don't know. A programming language where:

1 + 2 * 3

evaluates to 9 is fail to me.

In no way do we claim credit for open sourcing REBOL. It doesn't say that in the article, either.

As the Syllable project predicted many years ago

REBOL 3 open sourced, ported to Syllable, also new Red language.

Then some people such as yourself went poisonous and tried to sabotage our work.

Since Syllable is an open source project, the malcontents are free to fork the project. In fact, they did, sort of, and this turned out to be the extent of their capabilities:

http://pyro-os.org

Since you know everything better, you are free to join them.

So let's see... Syllable was great. I was worthless. All the devs left because worthless me was somehow able to chase them away. The devs were united in their disgust of me, so they forked Syllable into Pyro. Seeing that only worthless me was subtracted from the Syllable project, Pyro went on to become a great success and conquer the world.

When I program in C, I often need to refer to it, because it's too complex to remember

Much C code acknowledges that by not even relying on precedence, but littering expressions with parentheses to make them unambiguous

Dee, you're in a worse state than I thought. You still don't get it. You're not getting Pyro to work because you tried to delete all my hard work from it. The fact that you simply deny my work tells a story in itself.

All these years you have been claiming that our decisions to use Linux and REBOL lead to no being said to native Syllable work, but despite my repeated asking you have failed to come up with even one actual example. Maybe you can give one now?

You have a very selective memory. Do you call this staying quiet?

http://www.osnews.com/thread?488246

There are many others like it. Be a man and get your own fork to work, instead of bashing Syllable and me to hide your own incompetence.

The funny thing is that you used to talk about how far ahead of Haiku we were. The whole time, Haiku was blowing past us at lightening speed.

You have a very strange idea of modern operating system development. Where is Pyro, then? As long as you don't publish it, it's just vapourware.

"The funny thing is that you used to talk about how far ahead of Haiku we were. The whole time, Haiku was blowing past us at lightening speed.

There's no limit to the lies you will tell, is there? You know full well Syllable 0.6.7 is not 0.6.6. Several key additions in 0.6.7 won't even run on 0.6.6, for example Red, as this very article tells you.

Syllable doesn't support SATA