<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/26644/FreeBSD_Foundation_beats_fundraising_goal</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:06:16 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Long live FreeBSD</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?546657</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?546657</guid>
			<description>Long live FreeBSD!!!</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (graudeejs)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by graudeejs</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?546658</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?546658</guid>
			<description>Long live *BSD!!</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (graudeejs)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Congratulations!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?546660</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?546660</guid>
			<description>Congratulations are in order, especially considering that on December 9 some &quot;feckin' eejit&quot; submitted the story to Slashdot with the following summary:<br />
 <br />
 <i>&quot;Perhaps a sign of our troubled times or a sign that FreeBSD is becoming less relevant to modern computing needs [...] But with the end of this year fast approaching, it has raised just over $280,000, far short of its target.&quot;</i><br />
 <br />
 Yes, FreeBSD is dying and Netcraft confirms it, yadda yadda yadda, but the poster &quot;forgot&quot; to mention that the Fundraising Campaign had been only announced on December 5 and, therefore, collecting more than 280.000 USD in <b>just four days</b> should have been regarded as a very promising start. And don't get me started about the people that (as usual) hijacked the thread to blame the BSD license for this &quot;failure&quot;!<br />
 <br />
 Anyway, congratulations are certainly in order to anyone involved, and that includes the donors who, rather than argue about the merits/pitfalls of this license or the other, did the right thing and preferred to contribute something tangible -- me included. <b>*grin*</b><br />
 <br />
 Oh, and even though FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE has not been announced yet, it's been available for a good couple of weeks: clicking on the links leads to the official ISO images (and tar balls) rather than those for RC3 -- at least this is what happens in my part of the world.<br />
 <br />
 <br />
 RT.Edited 2012-12-30 13:20 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (karunko)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Congratulations!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?546665</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?546665</guid>
			<description>Yeah the same story was submitted to us. I ignored it.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom_Holwerda)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Congratulations!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?546669</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?546669</guid>
			<description>In hindsight, I wonder if the &quot;Oh no, they're not getting any money&quot; article was a very clever troll.  It spurred me into action and I also sent them a donation.  If so, a very clever article indeed.<br />
 <br />
 BSD doesn't get enough credit, I think.  It's still somewhat of a hassle to install it on a desktop, but as a server OS it's worth the money.   I run <a href="http://www.dictatorshandbook.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.dictatorshandbook.net</a> on it, and it's really truly been rock solid, and comes with a default configuration that already chooses safety over features.  That's cool.Edited 2012-12-30 14:28 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (the_randymon)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Open Source</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?546670</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?546670</guid>
			<description>This is what open source is all about - the sense of community is inspiring within the OSS world.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mweichert)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>It's here</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?546674</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?546674</guid>
			<description>As a nice coincidence 9.1 was just released. ISOs were already available for those that looked. Unfortunately you still can only use ports to install software as the binary package building system isn't up yet after the security breach.Edited 2012-12-30 18:51 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 18:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (deej)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: It's here</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?546677</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?546677</guid>
			<description>HAH! I had downloaded 9.1-RELEASE a few days ago without even realizing that it was the release and not RC3. Time to give it a whirl on some bare metal.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Drumhellar)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>who donated?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?546679</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?546679</guid>
			<description>Would be interesting to know the breakdown of the donators. Is it laregely private individual contributions .. or a few large corporate donations? <br />
<br />
If it is corporations would be useful to know who is backing (and I suspect using) FreeBSD. I was surprised that my blu-ray player's documentation had a copyright notice for netbsd.... !</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 21:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (project_2501)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>HAIKU OS</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?546682</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?546682</guid>
			<description>To the contrary, Haiku seems quite far from their [modest] fundraising goal.<br />
<br />
They re-use and adapt BSD drivers, so there is some overlap...</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 22:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Treza)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: who donated?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?546683</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?546683</guid>
			<description>See for yourself at <a href="http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/donate/sponsors.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/donate/sponsors.shtml</a>  Looks to me like a healthy mix of corporates and individuals.  Some anonymous corp donated a quarter million dollars all in one, but there are hundreds of individuals who gave from $5 and up.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 22:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (the_randymon)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Congratulations!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?546684</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?546684</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">&quot;feckin' eejit&quot; submitted the story to Slashdot with the following summary:  </div><br />
<br />
That's what you get for reading Suckdot. &quot;BSD is dead&quot; is practically the battle cry around those parts.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 22:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Soulbender)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>on the topic of freebsd</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?546688</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?546688</guid>
			<description>Does FreeBSD have any hardware assisted virtualization software for it?  Is there a VirtualBox or Xen for the FreeBSD family of OS's?</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 23:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (TechGeek)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Congratulations!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?546706</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?546706</guid>
			<description>Your post is too, a clever troll.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 05:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Wafflez)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: on the topic of freebsd</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?546710</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?546710</guid>
			<description>Virtualbox works perfectly. Xen Dom0 support will come with 10.0. Check out <a href="http://xenbits.xen.org/people/attilio/presentations/FreeBSD_developers_summit_XEN_2012.ppt" rel="nofollow">http://xenbits.xen.org/people/attilio/presentations/FreeBSD_develop...</a> for more info on the state of Xen support.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 06:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (deej)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: on the topic of freebsd</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?546722</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?546722</guid>
			<description>Another option for virtualization on FreeBSD 10 - bhyve <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
<br />
<a href="http://bhyve.org/" rel="nofollow">http://bhyve.org/</a></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Risthel)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: on the topic of freebsd</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?546724</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?546724</guid>
			<description>I don't think a hypervisor that runs on freebsd and, right now, can only run freebsd is what the OP had in mind....</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 11:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Soulbender)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: on the topic of freebsd</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?546725</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?546725</guid>
			<description>Jails.... has &quot;pure hardware support&quot; <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
 It runs straight on cpu. lolEdited 2012-12-31 11:14 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 11:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (graudeejs)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: HAIKU OS</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?546732</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?546732</guid>
			<description>Last year they had a smaller goal, and when they achieved it they suddenly upped their goal by 50%  Also, they haven't updated their donations since November.  Who knows how much they got within the last month?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (andrewclunn)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Congratulations!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?546733</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?546733</guid>
			<description>The supposed down side of the BSD license is that companies can just take the code, close source it, and release (cough Apple cough).  The good part is that then those companies want to continue to take advantage of the development done by the open source community, so they'll throw some money at BSD to keep the dream alive (to the tune of $250,000 it seems).<br />
<br />
If Apple wants to &quot;steal&quot; code that's being given away in return for the WebKit and Clang, great.  If companies are willing to give big bucks to open source development because they think it's cheaper than hiring coders outright, that's fine by me.  Here's to truly open source software, and all the BSD haters can shove it!</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (andrewclunn)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
