<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/26687/QML_component_API_s_to_come_together_</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:12:15 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Terrific news</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?548232</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?548232</guid>
			<description>This is exactly how things should be. Great job on everyone's part for getting together and at least working towards relieving pain points.<br />
<br />
To me this is one of the undeniable upsides to collaborative software and transparent development.<br />
<br />
Keep on iterating on QML, it's a gold mine for Linux if they can keep improving it at this speed.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 21:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Nelson)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by shmerl</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?548238</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?548238</guid>
			<description>That's the way to collaborate, instead of barking at competitors with patent threats like Apple and MS do to others.Edited 2013-01-10 21:48 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 21:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (shmerl)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Comment by shmerl</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?548248</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?548248</guid>
			<description>Microsoft, Apple, and patents are the new Godwin's Law on OSNews. <br />
<br />
This thread has absolutely nothing to do with either of them. Why the inflammatory rhetoric?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 22:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Nelson)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Comment by shmerl</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?548251</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?548251</guid>
			<description>He forgot Elop, the Microsoftian out to destroy Nokia.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 22:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ronaldst)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Comment by shmerl</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?548261</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?548261</guid>
			<description>Just a demonstration of difference in approaches. Proprietary mobile scene is filled with paranoia and fear of competition, which results in you know what. Open source mobile scene shows interest in innovation and collaborative effort.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 22:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (shmerl)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Great development</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?548298</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?548298</guid>
			<description>After the Gnome / Unity hostilities it's great to see that two groups -- who are software vendors in this case -- come together and work on common APIs. I applaud this behaviour.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 02:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (thesunnyk)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Great development</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?548307</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?548307</guid>
			<description>I counted Three, but second the sentiment.Edited 2013-01-11 03:03 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 03:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ricegf)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by Wafflez</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?548319</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?548319</guid>
			<description>I'm a tad cynical, Linux is well known for bazilion ever changing implementations...</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 05:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Wafflez)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Comment by Wafflez</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?548334</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?548334</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">I'm a tad cynical, Linux is well known for bazilion ever changing implementations... </div>Yep, this is a nice exception to the usual &quot;I'll do it MY way&quot;.<br />
<br />
This plus the Compiz maintainer suggesting that it is better to add Compiz features to Weston instead of porting Compiz to Wayland, nice!</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 08:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (renox)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Comment by shmerl</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?548375</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?548375</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Just a demonstration of difference in approaches. Proprietary mobile scene is filled with paranoia and fear of competition, which results in you know what. Open source mobile scene shows interest in innovation and collaborative effort. </div><br />
 <br />
 No it was just another chance for you to get on the soapbox.<br />
 <br />
 Why don't you mention the nazis next as suggested?Edited 2013-01-11 13:27 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lucas_maximus)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Comment by shmerl</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?548408</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?548408</guid>
			<description>You just avoid the fact that you implicitly support unethical business practices when advocating for Microsoft.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (shmerl)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: Comment by shmerl</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?548458</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?548458</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">You just avoid the fact that you implicitly support unethical business practices when advocating for Microsoft. </div><br />
 <br />
 No I choose the best tool for the job. I realize business is business and happens to work best at the time.<br />
 <br />
 You don't even know what true lock-in is (I do),  and what is really unethical ... Microsoft is no-where even near it.<br />
 <br />
 I doubt you work in the IT industry or outside academia, contrary to whatever you may claim.Edited 2013-01-11 22:59 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 22:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lucas_maximus)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
