<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/4308/LinuxWorld_2003_Report</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:37:40 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Show</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>It is a nice show and not only for linux prof.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2003 07:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: MSFT SFU/Interix</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description><i>&quot;...Microsoft had a couple of these large posters advertising Windows Services for UNIX. Somehow I don't think many of the attendees of LinuxWorld will be looking at this real seriously.&quot;</i><br />
<br />
Well in that case, you would be quite wrong, actually...<br />
<br />
One of just 10 winners, Windows Services for UNIX 3.0 took the Open Source Product Excellence Award for Best System Integration Software at the LinuxWorld Conference &amp; Expo [January 24, 2003].<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/sfu/productinfo/news/awards/linuxworld.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/windows/sfu/productinfo/news/awards/linuxw...</a></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2003 07:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>So.. where are those Looking Glass screenshots? <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2003 07:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: MSFT SFU/Interix</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description><i>One of just 10 winners, Windows Services for UNIX 3.0 took the Open Source Product Excellence Award for Best System Integration Software at the LinuxWorld Conference &amp; Expo [January 24, 2003].</i><br />
<br />
What's the betting that they bought that, just like they buy everything else?<br />
<br />
Did anybody spot the God awful Dell comment in that article:<br />
<br />
&quot; I inquired as to whether there would be a desktop release of Dells running Linux any time soon... Their second response was that Microsoft was putting sufficient licensing pressure on Dell to make it less economical to sell Linux boxes than to just bundle Windows.&quot;<br />
<br />
Looks like those monopoly lawsuits in the US really got paid off... I mean, really paid off.  Damn those Freundian slips.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2003 08:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Dell and Linux</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>If MSFT is actually strong-arming Dell, then why is Dell selling plenty of Linux on their servers? (about 20% of their server boxes ship with Linux on them). Dell could easily put Linux on their desktop boxes also if they thought they would sell any. IIRC, they stopped doing this a while back precisely because they weren't selling, according to Michael Dell (maybe GNOME/KDE have improved enough over the past 1-2 years to deserve another shot, I don't know).<br />
<br />
Not that MSFT needs any help from me to defend them or anything, but if you're going to bash them for something, you've got to do better than that around here.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2003 08:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Dell and Linux</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Well the desktop market is a bit different to the server market.<br />
<br />
The majority of desktops probably run what is installed on them at sale time.  Therefore, selling Linux on desktops would impact on Microsoft.<br />
<br />
Servers are bought to fill specialist needs.  Since server licenses from Microsoft are extortionate, they cannot realistically make Dell sell all servers with MS Windows 20XX Server installed on them, as people who wanted non-MSified servers simply wouldn't go to Dell.<br />
<br />
The cost of providing a Windows license on a desktop PC is negligible, though, so they can force Dell to sell only Microsoft-setup Dell desktop PCs as the few people who do want to install something else won't mind the few pounds hit.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2003 08:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Sun's Xserver</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>going by that shot from Sun10 it would seem like they havn't got render fully ported into their Xserver let, seen that the text is not antialiased, then again it's a screenshot on a beta release, and it still looks alot better then CDE</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2003 09:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>wrong thread</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>doh! this is the problem about using mozilla-firebird and tabs ;-)</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2003 09:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Moscone Center</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Spelling/typing error:<br />
Moscone Center, NOT Mascone Center</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Moscone Center</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Odd, first time the author gets it right spelling it Moscone, second time they miss spell it. I'll give them the benefit of the doubt.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>The danger of the missing article, &amp;quot;it&amp;quot;...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Mr. Wread sumbitted this report the day after the expo, and has been stuck in mailing list server purgatory.<br />
<br />
Did he come out of there ok?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2003 13:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>drat, ignorance</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I was in SF during the dates of the show, too bad I missed it.  Thanks for the report</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2003 15:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Great report</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Nicely written and with great photos.  Couple of inescapable emotional Microsoft vs Linux comments in the article didn't much spoil it, but it would be better without them.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2003 16:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
