<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/6492/Write_an_Article_Win_a_Free_Copy_of_Xandros_Business_Desktop_2_0</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2012, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:10:17 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>I'm so there!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I already love xandros to death! I'm going for it <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2004 23:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Bring it on</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I was in the middle of writing an article for publication hopefully. Here is to making it even better.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2004 23:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Not until the terms change</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I've often considered submitting articles for publication in OSNews, but each time the policy of restricting my ability to publish the article elsewhere (on my own web site's tutorial section, for example) changes my mind.<br />
<br />
Remove this restriction, or make it a little more specific (such as no re-publishing on other on-line periodicals or commercial sites, or allowing re-publishing after an amount of time has passed) and I'll be happy to contribute.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2004 23:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Not until the terms change</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&gt; or make it a little more specific (such as no re-publishing on other on-line periodicals or commercial sites, or allowing re-publishing after an amount of time has passed) and I'll be happy to contribute.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
That's exactly what it is now (in the bottom of the article guidelines page): You can re-publish your work on another site/medium after the pass of 30 days of being published on OSNews. <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
<br />
We only ask that you tell us if you are  going to do so, so we can have a clue when seeing another meduim being re-publishing under your permission or if they are stealing (we have had such an incident a few months ago with an Australian printed magazine, so you can never be too careful :-)</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Can it be about</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Xandros Business Desktop 2.0<br />
:)<br />
Oh wait I have to win it first.<br />
;)</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>osnews is quality...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>...if I could write I would.  Just too busy with my dissertation (and I'm sure you won't want publish that - &quot;Evolving a behavioural control architecture&quot; <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" />   Thanks Eugenia and other contributors - i always enjoy reading osnews!</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: osnews is quality...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&gt;&quot;Evolving a behavioural control architecture&quot;<br />
<br />
If that has to do with neural nets, AI and any other such technology that can &quot;learn&quot;, we would _love_ to publish it! OSNews is not only about operating systems per se, you see. <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Not until the terms change</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Thank you, Eugenia, for calling me on my mistake.  I did read down to the bottom of the page, but stopped paying as close attention when I reached the highlighted &quot;Articles submitted and published on OSNews are not to be re-published elsewhere,&quot;<br />
<br />
So I missed the 30-day proviso.  My apologies.  I'll see if I can whip something up by the deadline.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>xandros</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Heh, write another Xandros review ;-)</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>If you're looking for ideas</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I would like to see an article on Mandrake Linux 10.0 that covers more then just the installation, it would especially be nice to find out whats new since Mandrake 9.2 and what the pros and cons one might find after upgrading from an older version.<br />
<br />
Some of the more interesting articles on OSNews were the Mac ones, they tend to have more interesting information imho but that might be because I have never used a Mac so everything I hear about Mac's is news to me :-) .</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>oh the joy--a free xandros copy</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>of all the god damned things to give away, this has to be the worst!</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Idea</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Just send me the copy of Xandros and I'll write the review for it... deal?  <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>More powerful to OSnews</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Yes,that OSnews not only about operating system...that's one I lov OSnews.May Osnews prosper!</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>OpenBSD review?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description><i>Extra &quot;points&quot; for editors submitting articles that we haven't posted so far (e.g. an OpenBSD review...</i><br />
<br />
Why is there's a lack of BSD reviews? I have been wanting to read BSD reviews, especially OpenBSD and NetBSD.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Do articles for class count?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I'm writing a paper for a class, and wasn't planning on posting it anywhere other than the site where we have to turn it in.  Would that count?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 02:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Do articles for class count?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>If your teachers are ok with it and if it is indeed material that would interest our geek/tech readers (and in the right format), sure, go ahead and submit it. <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 02:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Article Guidelines :-)</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Spelling seems to be important for submitters but not for the writer(s) of the guideline.  Look at the word that is supposed to be 'send'.<br />
<br />
Excerpt from guidelines:<br />
...<br />
Nevertheless, OSNews is not Usenet; Capitalization, punctuation, and good spelling are required. Please run your article through a spellchecker before submitting it to us,...<br />
...<br />
However, please do not semd your article in anything else but text files (.txt or .html)...</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 03:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Article Guidelines :-)</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>The original version of the guidelines article was written by David who is a native english speaker. But since 2002, I have changed/added/removed stuff from that guide directly in our database a gazillion times, so it hasn't seen any spellchecking (because it was not needed to be sent to our proof readers as that guide was not exactly a 'current article to be published'), so some typos are normal to be found on it with all the changes I have done throughout the years.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 03:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Article Guidelines :-)</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I just found it interesting :-)  I have a question on the article submission - I have been working on a tutorial for Samba lab setup with Windows policies and it is currently in rough form on my site.  Does this mean that to submit a finished version I would have to remove the rough version from my site, submit the finished version to OSNews, wait 30 days after publication (if published) before it could go back up on my site?  Or is it ineligible because of prior partial posting on my site?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 03:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Article Guidelines :-)</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I can't answer this exactly as I don't know how much different/larger the final version will be over the one you got on your site currently. I guess this is something to be decided on a case-by-case basis. Give me a URL of the existing and a draft/proof-of-concept of a &quot;final&quot; version and will let you know. <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 04:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Technology &amp;amp; Global Patriotism</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I'm going to throw my hat into the ring.  May not be ready in time but it's nice that we have a venue.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 07:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>a question</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>recently i was thinking of posting an article on osnews well great opportunity for me. also another question is there any specific word limit for min or max words? i have came up with a wonderfull idea for an article (never seen before) however it might be a short one so egunia does such min or max word limit exist? if yes pls specify</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 07:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>another question </title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>who will decide as who is the winner? i.e readers or jury?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 07:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE:  a question</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>As it is mentioned in the guidelines page, your article should have be a minimum of 5 KBs of text (that is probably a minimum of about 5500 bytes with the HTML tags in it).</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 07:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: another question </title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&gt;who will decide as who is the winner? i.e readers or jury?<br />
<br />
As it is written in the article (you did read the &quot;read more&quot; part, right?), it will be the main editors of this site.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 07:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re: RE: another question </title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>oops sorry i was exited about the compitition that i forgot to read more. sorry i will read all the guidelines carefully <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 07:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>share.....</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Those who ever wins it, share it with rest of the osnews regs ;-).<br />
<br />
After all, we are here for helping others <img src="/images/emo/grin.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>GREAT...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>nothing like a little bribary to get people to write stuff about xandros business edition. you all know you're only gonna write good stuff about it in order to get a free copy. if that isn't bias, then what is?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Editors</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Wouldn't it be a better idea to attract proofreaders and editors?  It doesn't seem like OSNews is suffering from a dearth of content, but rather one of quality control.  As pointed out above, a number of documents on the site (including some of the guidelines for the contest) are embarrassingly bad--possibly bad enough to deter potential contributors.  It appears to me that a &quot;Help Wanted: Editors&quot; notice might be warranted, moreso than a call for new writers.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 13:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Funny</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>- If you are not a native english speaker don't worry too much,<br />
we can have it proofread.<br />
- You can send more than one articles.<br />
<br />
one articles (?) have been proofread I guess...</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 13:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: GREAT...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&quot;nothing like a little bribary to get people to write stuff about xandros business edition. you all know you're only gonna write good stuff about it in order to get a free copy. if that isn't bias, then what is?&quot;<br />
<br />
I guess you didn't read the article.<br />
They are looking for people to write an article or a review PERIOD.<br />
<br />
They didn't mention the subject had to be Xandros.<br />
And in fact, I don't honnestly think someone someone already familiar with Xandros will want to win Xandros, so I expect the winning article to be about something else.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>A really bad tech article</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>That article was so bad I had to write a letter to the newspaper:<br />
<br />
Dear Mike,<br />
<br />
I am writing to complain about this article: &quot;Cutting-edge chips to transform computing <br />
64-bit processor can handle more games, DVD copying <br />
March 25, 2004<br />
BY JULIO OJEDA-ZAPATA&quot;<br />
<br />
This article is fraught with inaccuracies. The whole premise is false. <br />
<br />
Going from 32-bit to 64-bit is in no way inherently 2X faster. No way. Memory paths are still only 32-bit wide, you can't speed up the memory copies. There already exists 64-bit floating point math, it's called the SSE instructions and they are already used today.<br />
<br />
Gamers will not benefit greatly from going to greater than 4GB of RAM. Most of them are only using 512MB today, if the benefits were so great why don't they ugrade to 1 GB? The reason is that there no huge lurking benefit.<br />
<br />
And although you can convert DVD's on today's 64-bit CPU's there is only a marginal benefit for the reasons previously mentioned.<br />
<br />
The author really needs to check his facts. He's dead wrong on this article.<br />
<br />
Best regards,<br />
Andrew</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Second prize...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>is TWO copies of Xandros!</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 16:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>The 30 days term.</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>How the hell do you think you can enforce that 30 days term? The Author of a work is normally in his/her rights to do whatever with the work he/she wants, including but not limited to: republishing, selling, relicensing. The rights over the published work here are NOT yours when it is posted here. The work which is published here is copyrighted by the Author, not by you. Therefore i don't see why it is your job to search for any copyright infringement. With the 30 days rule, you reduce the rights of the Author over the work in an extend that he/she has not got any normal rights over his/her work for 30 days. He/she may not even publish it on his/her own website. This sickens me. It is a common practice in magazines, but Authors who publish their work in such a magazine get paid for publishing their work in contrast to the practice on this site.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 16:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: dpi</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I must say I completely disagree with you. <br />
<br />
If someone has an invention and agrees to bring it to the market with some company, how fair would it be if he/she then moves to another company with the same idea?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Pre-posted long paper...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>If one had a pre-posted long paper, howto, or such and would like to enter the contest. Could they write a one page overview of the existing work, and submmit that?<br />
<br />
Also:<br />
<br />
As for the 30 days, how long can you hold the paper before publishing it?<br />
Do you give an 'expexted print date' to the author within a week of recipt?<br />
<br />
What happens if:<br />
Day 1  Submitted<br />
Day 40 Not yet printed<br />
Day 41 Printed but missed by Author(setting up Day 45)<br />
Day 45 Re-Printed on other site<br />
<br />
Is the Author OK (45&gt;30) or not (5</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>SIGH</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>If you want to post your writing on your own site, by all means do so. You can send Eugenia an email and if it is any good she will link to your site. She does this routinely.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Pre-posted long paper...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&gt;Could they write a one page overview of the existing work, and submmit that? <br />
<br />
Not really.<br />
<br />
&gt;As for the 30 days, how long can you hold the paper before publishing it? <br />
<br />
You start counting from the moment it gets published.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re: The 30 days term</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>How the hell do you think you can enforce that 30 days term?<br />
<br />
Well one means of enforcement would be to no longer consider any future works by the Author.<br />
<br />
The Author of a work is normally in his/her rights to do whatever with the work he/she wants, including but not limited to: republishing, selling, relicensing. The rights over the published work here are NOT yours when it is posted here. The work which is published here is copyrighted by the Author, not by you.<br />
<br />
The rights to the work are whatever are negotiated between the Author and the Publisher.<br />
<br />
You can look at the stipulation in this light: &quot;In compensation to OSNews for exposing your work, publishing your work, hosting your work, allowing comments on your work and paying for the bandwidth used in the distribution of your work, you grant us a 30 day exclusivity license.&quot; How is that unfair? And if you feel it is unfair, then don't submit anything.<br />
<br />
Therefore i don't see why it is your job to search for any copyright infringement. With the 30 days rule, you reduce the rights of the Author over the work in an extend that he/she has not got any normal rights over his/her work for 30 days. He/she may not even publish it on his/her own website.<br />
<br />
It is OSNews job to enforce their contract with the Author, otherwise it is meaningless. The Author submits these articles freely and enters into an agreement with OSNews.<br />
<br />
By granting exclusivity to OSNews, OSNews get a modicum of benefit in that if an article become remote popular, the traffic for that article is basically guaranteed to go through OSNews site, and traffic through the site is how OSNews maintains its existence. It's also a medium for OSNews to gain new readers (for example, from a cross link on Slashdot).<br />
<br />
An Author may consider entering into this arrangement because publishing on their own site may well mean it never gets read at all. The Author is attracted to OSNews by the readership and, ideally, wants his article to be read. By getting it posted on OSNews, he has a far better chance of that than by posting it on his own site.<br />
<br />
I would imagine that the 30 Day limit doesn't particularly chafe against most authors, and OSNews probably has to rarely enforce anything. Somehow I doubt that OSNews has an elite Special Force of ex-SAS member scouring the net for infringments of its Submission Agreements.<br />
<br />
This sickens me. It is a common practice in magazines, but Authors who publish their work in such a magazine get paid for publishing their work in contrast to the practice on this site.<br />
<br />
If it sickens you, try some Mylanta. <br />
<br />
The compensation Authors get by posting on OSNews is simply exposure and perhaps recognition. The compensation OSNews gets for hosting the article at their expense is a continuing flow of content that keeps readers regularly coming back to the site.<br />
<br />
It's hardly a draconian agreement, its certainly not mandatory, and you can always try and get your article submitted to a plethora of other places.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re: The 30 days term</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Thank you Will, very well said.<br />
<br />
&gt; The compensation Authors get by posting on OSNews is simply exposure and perhaps recognition<br />
<br />
Last year we had someone finding a job in an OS company after the boss of that OS company read his article here at OSNews. <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: The 30 days term</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>It's actually common practice for many magazines to apply and enforce a period of exclusivity for any submitted articles. Many, in fact, restrict submissions to other magazines until such time as they have accepted or declined the article in question. Think of such things as first serial publishing, etc. which rights are negotiated and either accepted or declined by the author.<br />
<br />
There is nothing unusual, and certainly nothing &quot;sickening&quot; about the limitations placed upon submissions to this contest.<br />
<br />
If you don't like it, take the well-advised Mylanta (or Pepto-Bismal, if your mood is dismal) and get a grip.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 23:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>as if there weren't enough...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>reviews about Xandros, but now prices encourage further articles about it. Is osnews dependant on donations from Xandros? I'm not saying anything about the dist, but again I'd like to just breifly point out that there are other OS out there. And I second the opionion about getting more BSD reviews there. Like, NetBSD vs. FreeBSD vs. OpenBSD. Which to pick?</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2004 06:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: as if there weren't enough...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>What are you talking about Daniel? Your comment reads really silly.<br />
Noone said about writing more Xandros reviews, we clearly ask for reviews about other things. You obviously did not read the full article.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2004 06:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Is this an osnews.com only thing...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>...or is the mobile sister site (whos name and URL I can never remember) likely to have a similar competition?</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Is this an osnews.com only thing...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&gt;...or is the mobile sister site (whos name and URL I can never remember) <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.NMCx.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.NMCx.com</a><br />
<br />
&gt;is likely to have a similar competition?<br />
<br />
I don't think it will.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE:  Write an Article, Win a Free Copy of Xandros Business Desktop 2.0</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I could do an interview with the former editor of Maximum Linux (if you guys and gals remember that mag) get his thoughts and ideas on linux and the direction it is heading in. What linux has over other OS's what it lacks... things like that...</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>share</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>hey if you win this you need to seed it on bittorent or share it in some form</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 03:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re: Re: The 30 days term.</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&quot;By getting it posted on OSNews, he has a far better chance of that than by posting it on his own site.&quot;<br />
<br />
Sorry, i disagree. Well put information spreads well anyway. Perhaps slower when not posted on a popular website. I learned that myself after i wrote articles for small websites; later i discovered a few of them popping up in other on-line e-zines and newssites.<br />
<br />
There are a lot of (small) websites which don't have this clause <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" />  like you put it: a better deal. I'd like to point that out and i believe i'm Free to do so.<br />
<br />
&quot;It's actually common practice for many magazines to apply and enforce a period of exclusivity for any submitted articles. Many, in fact, restrict submissions to other magazines until such time as they have accepted or declined the article in question.&quot;<br />
<br />
Uhm. I basically said that too, didn't i?<br />
<br />
There is a huge difference which both Will and you haven't bothered to think about. Instead you claim the newsposter gains something which he/she already gains on other websites as well. I addressed: those magazines PAY their authors! On OSnews.com, authors get NOTHING of the revenue OSnews.com makes.<br />
<br />
Here, take Newsforge:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.newsforge.com/write.tmpl" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsforge.com/write.tmpl</a><br />
<br />
&quot;We pay $50 - $300 for news, reviews, case studies, HOWTOs, and feature articles directly related to Linux, Open Source, or Free Software. We expect a &quot;30-day exclusive&quot; on paid articles. Look at what we're already publishing to get an idea of the kind of stories we like, but don't be afraid to submit an idea that's unlike anything else we've ever published. We love originality.&quot;<br />
<br />
(Notice the word &quot;expect&quot;; it implies negotiations are open.)<br />
<br />
If it is a Good article you have a high chance of getting your fame on (sites like) Slashdot (or OSnews <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> , too. Overal, a much better deal if you ask me.<br />
<br />
A repeat as summary: What you assert is: &quot;You get the fame and the possibility to share your information using our popularity and we grab all the money ourselves&quot; and including a the 30-days term which i never stumbled across _without_ a compensation in the form of money.<br />
<br />
If you still haven't understood it: there is a huge difference.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 09:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

