<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/7304/Preview_of_Windows_XP_Service_Pack_2</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:12:15 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>i lost my network connection</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>after i installed SP2 beta ( last one ) i lost my network connection, even if i disabled firwall and other security things . so uninstalled it, hope final version won't do that <img src="/images/emo/grin.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 18:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Problems with firewall</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Firewall does not detect GAIM/Indiatimes/Trillian connections for me. It just allows them without asking for blocking them. <br />
Internet explorer hangs at times. It does not respond for few seconds. VMware does not work with my machine atleast. It just reboots.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 18:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>external device stopped working?!?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>let me get this straight: he installed beta sp2 and his wireless router, a device that has nothing to do with his computer or windows at all and may or may not be only connected as another device on a network, wireless or otherwise, STOPPED WORKING.<br />
<br />
if i had a device on my network that caused other devices on my network to stop working i'd be worried.  not only is that bad for his computer running sp2, but its affective disrupting services of things that having nothing to do with sp2 or windows or microsoft even.<br />
<br />
to me that's impressive.  when an OS can not only crash itself, but crash other unrelated devices without user intervention, you know you have power.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 18:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Heavily Loaded</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Check out the massive quantity of desktop icons, quick launch shortcuts, and resident system tray applications on this guy's system.  Notice the little &quot;show me more&quot; button by the system tray inidicating he's got a lot more running.<br />
<br />
The last time I saw a mess like this I was helping a newbie bring his system back from the dead.  Even with 512MB of memory the system was thrashing under the load of twenty+ system tray apps and saddled with a swollen windows registry.<br />
<br />
If you're running a similar bloated and unorgnized system the new features of SP2 mentioned my Roberto will be a welcome addition to help protect your system against your own folley.  Not to mention the addition of yet even more resident applications! - Enjoy.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 18:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>I'm sorry</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I dont mean to be rude, but I cannot take anything by this guy seriously.<br />
<br />
He has damaged his credibility on these threads over the previous years.<br />
<br />
Maybe he has grown up a bit.<br />
<br />
I hope so.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 18:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>I don't see</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>how anyone is allowed the right to &quot;complain&quot; about anything (software related) that is considered beta. <br />
<br />
&quot;this is where I tear into...&quot;  <br />
<br />
No, this is where you NOTE problems with SP2 and inform (as you said) MS of your problems. Don't beta test angry <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 18:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>I wonder if this is the same guy from slash dot?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I guess they figured out away to kick this guy off slash dot.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 19:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>-_-&amp;quot;</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>-_-&quot;<br />
<br />
how many key strokes they put up with that, i wonder.<br />
even hitting ctrl-v only, it still a lot.<br />
<br />
or using some script? .. wo~ lots of efforts eh? <img src="/images/emo/tongue.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 19:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Well I guess Ill wait</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>for the official SP2 release. It does seem buggy according to this review and having it go ahead and allow connections just have a long wait is a MAJOR security error. But this is beta so again Ill wait.<br />
<br />
And as for the Gosh Awful Spam. WHERE are the MODS? 100 posts of pure spam, the guy probably wrote a simple script with a fake ip address used each time. OSnews has got to get some better ways of preventing this mass spamage, maybe actually making users sign up to post something -_- instead of anonymous.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 19:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>SQL Injection</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Clearly, what happened in this forum was result of a sucessful SQL Injection attack. You can see this because the reverse IP's of the readers haven't changed. Only the content of their messages. Not very hard to do, actually.<br />
<br />
Unless Eugenia &amp; co have a backup of the bank today earlier (I doubt, nobody would), they will have to shut this article down.<br />
<br />
I hope I'm wrong tho. If it is so, Eugenia will have some more trouble debugging the PHP code to prevent this to ever happen again.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 19:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>GNY</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Well, he's got a whole lot of IP addresses, so I'm guessing he's not using one machine. Either he's got a little script running on a bunch of systems he found to be vulnerable, or he's got a script running on his machine that just spoofs a different IP each time, and posts automatically. Yeah, a lot of effort for sure :-)</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 19:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>4 session in 1</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>In the pics I could see that Roberto is using a program to switch between 4 sessions in XP, like in Linux.<br />
Which is the name of that app?<br />
<br />
Thanks</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 19:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>funny</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>haha running firefox . . .<br />
<br />
:P</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 19:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Internet Explorer in SP2</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Does IE finally support PNG alpha blending and position:fixed?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 19:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re: 4 session in 1</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&quot; In the pics I could see that Roberto is using a program to switch between 4 sessions in XP, like in Linux.<br />
Which is the name of that app?<br />
<br />
Thanks&quot;<br />
<br />
Deskman Powertoy, you can either download if from Microsoft or from my site.  <a href="http://www.geocities.com/rjdohnert/computer.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.geocities.com/rjdohnert/computer.htm</a></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 20:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re 4 session in 1</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>That is microsoft's &quot;official&quot; power toy for XP.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 20:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re:4 session in 1</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>It's the Microsoft Vitual Desktop Manager Power Toy. Available from Microsoft(Free Unsupported Download). It has a few quirks that I don't like about it, but overall it's kinda cool.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 20:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>whee?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>is anyone else not fooled by the hype surrounding this nonsense?  any idiot can secure their windows (any version) box up in less than 5 minutes.  how about some actual bugfixes?  maybe the tooltips in the taskbar actually staying ABOVE the taskbar like they're supposed to?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 20:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Remote Desktop ?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Good article Roberto. Do you have test the possibility to use two Remote Desktop connections at the same time?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 20:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re: whee?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I would say anything that turns on the firewall by default and tames Internet Explorer ActiveX hell a bit is a good thing.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 20:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>sp2 wont help many ppl...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>IMHO <a href="http://img.osnews.com/img/7304/xp3.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img.osnews.com/img/7304/xp3.jpg</a> - shows a flaw in the windows sp2 firewall... everybody will click: YES - Unblock this program, since it's the default option.<br />
<br />
I repeat: This wont help windows security. Only ppl who understand what's going on will examine the situation...</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 21:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Why is this update so important ?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>As far as I read, this is JUST a bug fixes release. Nothing more, nothing less. Why being so exited by this is something i don't understand.<br />
But in a microsoft world, what is a blind man ?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 21:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Disclaimer</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I wish the disclaimer stated here of being beta software was applied to ALL beta software, including RC versions of linux. It would help all the whining about what doesn't work be applied to the bug reports rather than this site. Did anyone actually think that everything was going to work on beta software being windows or linux or any other software? If it all worked, it would be called &quot;FINAL&quot;.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 21:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Few points...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Well firstly, I'm not quite sure why the reviewer chose to try such an old build of SP2... RC1 is build 2096, and they're already at 2142 officially (running it now).<br />
<br />
The majority of the bugs he mentioned have been fixed, including some particularly nasty ones that cropped up since RC1. Also, a few of the other &quot;annoyances&quot; he mentioned aren't present in SP2 at all, and I assume are an IBK issue on his machine, not SP2.<br />
<br />
To clarify about the default function of the firewall; outgoings are allowed, but incomings are blocked, hence &quot;Unblock.&quot;</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 21:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Remote Desktop and @  Why is this update so important ?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I did not test the remote desktop with XPSP2, I will do so tho when I do the review of the final build.  @  Yann LE COROLLER ,  This update is so important because its more than just a bug fix release.  This improves IE and OE security, Windows security overall by including NX support and shutting of most of the doors.  Also, the core binaries were recompiled using a new GS flag which helps improve protection against Memory and buffer overflows *** The information of the new GSflag can be aquired from Channel 9 ****.  OE will no longer automatically execute scripts and or attachements so this improves the chances of use avoiding all the cyber Typhoid Mary's as I like to call them.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 21:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re : BOFH</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>-----snip---<br />
To clarify about the default function of the firewall; outgoings are allowed<br />
-----snip-----<br />
isn't this the same stuipd befavor of old built-in XP firewall??</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 21:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re:  Few points</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&quot; Well firstly, I'm not quite sure why the reviewer chose to try such an old build of SP2... RC1 is build 2096, and they're already at 2142 officially (running it now). &quot;<br />
<br />
build 2096 is what Microsoft has on their site available for download.<br />
<br />
<br />
&quot; The majority of the bugs he mentioned have been fixed, including some particularly nasty ones that cropped up since RC1. Also, a few of the other &quot;annoyances&quot; he mentioned aren't present in SP2 at all, and I assume are an IBK issue on his machine, not SP2. &quot;<br />
<br />
If you can provide me with a download Link I would appreciate it for build 2142 I would appreciate it.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 21:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>....</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>BTW <br />
-----snip----<br />
SP2 changes the way future updates are installed by simply downloading only the parts that have changed<br />
----snip----<br />
from here <a href="http://www.xatrix.org/article3641.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.xatrix.org/article3641.html</a><br />
<br />
this is realy cool thing IMHO, i also hope they fixed that My_XP_is_Damn_Slow_After_Applaying_Patches/SP problem</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 21:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Re: Few points</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Drop me an e-mail (admin@osfocus.net), and I'll sort you out with a copy.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 21:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>works really really bad</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>i install Windows XP Service Pack 2 and everything went really bad. My network connection stop working, a lot of non-microsoft applications doesnt start now. Norton Antivirus cant start. My java developement enviroment (WSAD 5) doesnt work any more. Any last but not less my linux system (fedora core 2) doesnt boot now :0(. So ... if you want to keep working on your computer .... dont install SP2 ... or better delete your windows partition and install another OS :0)<br />
<br />
microsoft really sucks<br />
<br />
Alvaro</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 21:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>MS Gold code VS RC# VS Beta# VS Alpha# VS eye candy</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>In reality every M$ product is not about quality and functionality but about eye candy !<br />
<br />
I have never seen one product or patch to a product that was released by this company that EVER did what it calimed.<br />
<br />
Every version of Windows(since win 3.11), MS claimed that it was going to be secure .... was there ever a version that did not require monthly or even weekly updates...I have not seen one.<br />
<br />
MS gold code is what most companies call beta, accept for Corel, their products were even worse.<br />
<br />
So is SP2 going to change anything, yea sure it will fix 100 bugs and holes and over the next several years we will discover another 1000 holes and bugs that it created.  <br />
<br />
How many times do people have to be hit over the head to realize that it hurts ?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 22:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Sounds Really Buggy</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I can't believe all of the apps that SP2 borked. I mean come on, he could no longer install several apps and he kept getting prompted to reinstall his NIC drivers?? This sounds like pre-Alpha stuff. Considering how long SP2 has been in the works its more than a bit worrying.<br />
<br />
SP1 caused a few well known problems but nothing like he described. I'm going to stay far away from this Service Pack for as long as I can.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 23:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Disclaimer</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&quot; Did anyone actually think that everything was going to work on beta software being windows or linux or any other software?&quot;<br />
<br />
Yes, but this is a Windows deal, so its automatically not ok for even a beta to work 100%. On the other hand, many people on here have no problems with something Linux related that may not work perfectly, whether its in beta stage, or even a final release!</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 23:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE:  RE: Disclaimer</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I have no issues with SP2... why the hell must you people persist in being so fucking biased without experience?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 23:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>I have experience</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>but i didn't want to chip in, i'm a mac user now so my time is better spent USING the system rather than complaining about it. <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 23:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>The best way!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>The best way to keep windows running is simply not install service packs!  Even final releases end up breaking something.  The adding the software fire wall and anti-spyware is a good way to gunk up your registry.  If you have av software and update the dat file then you are looking at major stability issues.  Heck with all of that you might as well be infected.  It would be less problems thats for sure.<br />
<br />
Just every 6 months or so re-install windows and if you ARE going to install a service pack, avi dat files or a software fire wall.  test it first on your network.  Or best go without.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 23:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re:  The best way!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>And the best way to have FUD and inane ramblings removed from OSNews is for someone to finally ban you. Jesus christ, just pack it in. Seriously.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 00:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Not just bugfixes.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&quot;As far as I read, this is JUST a bug fixes release. Nothing more, nothing less. Why being so exited by this is something i don't understand.<br />
But in a microsoft world, what is a blind man ?&quot;<br />
It's not just bugfixes, their are several added features.  Also they have recompiled a major chunk of Windows, supposedly with the wonderful Intel compilers.  We're supposed to see a slight speed increase.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 00:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>only morons reinstall every 6months</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Only morons reinstall every 6months. The only reason i have had to reinstall is when I bork something up, like format the wrong partition when installing debian. I have this servicepack , it seems to be ok. firewalls should only be on network devices, but I know some people just have single computers. I have a crufty laptop works great except for games. Its only 800mhz with 384meg of ram and it boots faster than some of my friends laptops with twice the mhz and 1gb of ram. It has slowed down with sp2 tho.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 00:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Disbelievers</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Using SP2 RC1 2096 and have not experienced any problems whatsoever.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 00:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re: Disbelievers</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>2096 here also, I actually like the new firewall, add-on manager, popup-blocker, firewall etc. that has been added to windows. SP2 is great for people that surf porn and warez sites and need to avoid the resulting assault of persistant popups and annoying javascrips.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 01:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>When to format ...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>when to format is totally depends on how you use the windows. If you are installing/uinstalling alot of programs for trying and things like that , you will need to format it after a couple of weeks. Also the more programs you install to tweak the system(popupblocking, optimizations), the worse it gets. <br />
<br />
It actually depends on how you use the system. If you are only browsing the net and writing some word documents you can use it for years. If you are a power user and doing things like developing software,doing 3d graphics, you will need to format it often to keep it fast.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 01:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE:  When to format ...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Wrong again. I spend all my time doing 3D work, web design, professional graphics, as well as playing a fair few games like Far Cry, Painkiller, and the classics like Quake 3, Jedi Knight 2/Jedi Academy, Elite Force 1/2 and Alice.<br />
<br />
And I don't experience any slowdowns. The key to keeping your Windows box running fast is to defragment often, and make sure you use a defragger which can defrag the MFT and &quot;reserved system space.&quot;</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 01:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>bloat.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>i've been running 2096 since rc1 was released and i've had no problems with it either.  i'm anal retentive when it comes to keeping my drive and registry spotless, so that may have something to do with it.  however, i don't know why they are calling this a service pack.  it's a patch at best.  a patch with some pretty intrusive &quot;features&quot; that you have to spend extra time turning off.  i hope the final actually introduces a few things that may be of use to myself and others who know what we're doing instead of just a bunch of bloaty crap of marginal importance.  <br />
<br />
the one thing i DO look forward to are the compiler optimizations that may increase the snappiness of the os.  intel's compiler is a beautiful, beautiful thing.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 01:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>no png or position:fixed</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I don't think they have png support, or position:fixed support, but you can get support in IE here:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://dean.edwards.name/IE7/" rel="nofollow">http://dean.edwards.name/IE7/</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 02:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>That's not power use.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&quot;Wrong again. I spend all my time doing 3D work, web design, professional graphics, as well as playing a fair few games like Far Cry, Painkiller, and the classics like Quake 3, Jedi Knight 2/Jedi Academy, Elite Force 1/2 and Alice.<br />
<br />
And I don't experience any slowdowns. The key to keeping your Windows box running fast is to defragment often, and make sure you use a defragger which can defrag the MFT and &quot;reserved system space.&quot;&quot;<br />
3d work = word processing<br />
web design = word processing<br />
professional graphics (adobe?) = word processing<br />
<br />
I know that's not really true.  But the point is those are user level functions.  You do not need administrative priviledges to do it (unless there is something strange going on).  If you do, please inform me of why.<br />
The games are also fairly clean.  Their biggest trouble is that some games use the game directory for temp files and such so they require you to be an administrator (or change the permissions I suppose).<br />
I believe when he said power user he meant Power User (it's a type of user on Windows).  It's installing random free packages, and neat little toys.  Or writing programs and messing up a few times on how it writes it's registry keys.  These are the things that cause constant problems.<br />
I use Windows XP for games, and I must say the only problem in 18 months has been a corrupted ip stack.  After digging on google, one simple command fixed it.  I was getting close to reinstalling, but I really didn't wanna go through it all.<br />
<br />
DISCLAIMER: I meant no disrespect to people who do 3d and graphics work.  I am aware of the technical difficulties of it.  My only purpose in the statement was that it's a user level function, not an administrative function.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 02:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: When to format ...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Well as far as I see you only mentioned the games. I guess you do web design using notepad. Let's say for medium web projects you will be using php,mysql,apache. For editor you can use eclipse or similar to that. Let's come to 3D, ou will probably install 3dStudio max, Maya... And add the .Net development. I'm not even mentioning Dreamweaver and all this stuff. So when you do all this, come and tell me that windows doesn't slow down. Besides I'm talking about the overall performance, of course when you are playing far cry you wont see much difference, since you are only running that at that time.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 02:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>@Chris and Emre</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>@Chris: I can only assume that your post was purely written to insult me, so I'll ignore it. If you actually know who I was, you wouldn't talk such utter shit about my daily activities.<br />
<br />
@Emre: Notepad? Why would I be so stupid? I use Studio MX mainly, FireWorks for graphics and DreamWeaver for design. In terms of 3D I use Terragen, SolidWorks, and occasionally Bryce, but I do have 3DS installed to load up models every now and again when playing around with the hidden resources from LH.<br />
<br />
I also use the DX9 SDK a fair bit, again for the same reason as 3DS; testing the DX effects when applied to DirectX skeletons and textures, etc.<br />
<br />
I wouldn't touch Apache, MySQL, or PHP with a barge pole; mainly I use IIS6 and SQL Server 2005 (Yukon), and do all my coding in ASP (not ASP .NET). I keep the server stuff on a dedicated box though, so I can leave it running 24/7.<br />
<br />
I do have VS .NET 2005 (Whidbey) installed, however, for coding XAML and Avalon apps, again for my work on Longhorn.<br />
<br />
What else? Hmm... Virtual PC, need to keep a couple of VMs running simultaneously when testing out my apps, usually have Longhorn and Server 2k3 running at the same time, although occasionally I install Windows XP again within a VM to test out various things like Live Communications Server 2005 Beta.<br />
<br />
Not sure what else there is to say... Um... Oh yeah, I run iTunes constantly in the background, as well as BPFTP Server and PingPong-ABC BitTorrent Client, as well as all of the crap that VMWare and Virtual PC load as services. Also StyleXP (although I have a patched UXTheme and it doens't work on SP2, not sure why I'm still running that <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> , and CuteFTP Pro Transfer Engine. Just a couple of things, but drains on resources nonetheless.<br />
<br />
Just in case you think this is impossible, the specs of this box are Dual Xeon 2.4, 1Gb DDR266 ECC Registered (should be 2GB, but hey), 1x 120GB Seagate Barracuda, 1x 200GB Western Digital (Caviar? Not sure), PNY nVidia Quadro FX 2000, and a few other bits and pieces.<br />
<br />
Current uptime is 6 days 5 hours, and everything's still working fine. Oh, and the Sims is on in the background, and I'm watching a live Big Brother feed. If you doubt me, buy a plane ticket to the UK and I'll invite you over to show you.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 04:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Ignore his warnings</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>My machine runs just fine withe sp2.  As a matter of fact I have installed it on all of the windows machines in my house and no one has had a single problem that has resulted from sp2.  Then secondly sp2 has not even affected any of my applications or the built in cd burning, trust me I use a wide array of applications including: Maya, Photoshop, Acrobat, Auto-Cad,then Adobe Premiere.  Plus I would like to know what your settings were because your computer computer shouldn't even have have had any safemiode issues.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 04:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>A comedian in the house...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Let me quote from the comments above:<br />
<br />
&quot;2096 here also, I actually like the new firewall, add-on manager, popup-blocker, firewall etc. that has been added to windows. SP2 is great for people that surf porn and warez sites and need to avoid the resulting assault of persistant popups and annoying javascrips.&quot;<br />
<br />
Apple got it right when they started from a good clean slate built on top of proven software. Microsoft will learn this lesson the hard way.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re:4 session in 1</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Anyone know how the author got the &quot;MSVDM&quot; label to go away next to the green button?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 05:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Its a product?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Ofcourse it is, after 2 years of development in fixing bugs that should not have been there in the first place, it is important to know that the microsoft $$'s you are spending on your microsoft tax is going towards something worthwhile: a tethered service pack.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 07:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>ouch.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>iis, asp, and sql server?  jesus wept.  though he wept harder at the trainwreck that is php.  but not by much.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 07:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>support</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>They'll change something so that all the support workers around the globe have to memorize yet another different way to do the same thing...</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 10:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title> Re:4 session in 1</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&quot; Anyone know how the author got the &quot;MSVDM&quot; label to go away next to the green button? &quot;<br />
<br />
Rightr click on the desktop manager and uncheck show title.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 12:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title> Re:4 session in 1</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&quot;<br />
Rightr click on the desktop manager and uncheck show title.&quot;<br />
<br />
I dont have that option.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>@BoFH</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Hey man, thanks for the information, I believe you <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> . I want one of that computer actually <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> .<br />
<br />
Bottom line for me is: Whenever you install many program everything gets messed up in windows. I'm not saying this is a Windows' fault. Besides I'm a windows fan but I'm tired of reinstalling. Yes I do many stuff, I probably check every program that comes out and this kills the system but I would appreciate If I would not need to reinstall. Even that's why I use Vmware to developep web applications on virtual machine so my machine works ok <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" />  whitout installing those iis/apache/sql stuff.<br />
<br />
Anyway thanks for the information .</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 15:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>non-security bug fixes relating to stability?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>hi,<br />
i have a couple of questions hopefully someone who knows will kindly answer<br />
1- are there non-security bug fixes relating to stability?<br />
it's not clear to me that security is an issue as a home user.<br />
2- how much of a slowdown does sp2 inflict?<br />
3- if you just use dial-in modem 56k, is security/firewall really necessary?<br />
4- does sp2 support mount rainier/easywrite specs?<br />
<br />
thanks<br />
-dan</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 16:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re: 4 session in 1</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>You need to unlock the taskbar by right clicking it and unchecking &quot;Lock the taskbar&quot;. After that the &quot;Show title&quot; option should appear on the toolbar's context menu. Once you've disabled that you can lock the taskbar again if you wish.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 17:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re: 4 session in 1</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Worked!  Thank you!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 18:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: non-security bug fixes relating to stability?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>1) There are no stability issues with Windows XP, non-SP2 along with SP2. Any &quot;stability issues&quot; you are experiencing are caused by user error, driver error, or hardware failure. Suggest upgrading your PSU and defragging regularly (every week or so).<br />
<br />
2) None, it introduces significant performance INcreases, not decreases.<br />
<br />
3) Of course; your files can still be viewed and modified by potential hackers.<br />
<br />
4) No idea.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 23:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: By Anonymous (IP: ---.158.174.31.Dial1.Chicago1.Level3.net) </title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>My take:<br />
<br />
&gt;1- are there non-security bug fixes relating to stability? <br />
<br />
There could be. No software is 100% bug free, almost any bug either affects stability or security, or both.<br />
<br />
In general, BOFH is right- XP is really stable. If you use your computer for general purpose tasks and do not tweak it or do not Add/Remove software daily- you don't even need to defrag. Forget about defrag- I have 2 years old XP and never even defragged hard drive.<br />
NTFS- it just works.<br />
<br />
&gt;it's not clear to me that security is an issue as a home user. <br />
<br />
It is an issue because a Windows worm managed to hit 5-10 million home computers that could have been protected if default XP firewall were enabled. It is just 5% of Windows user base, but nevertheless.<br />
<br />
I can tell you, I believe it were one of the greatest mistakes made by the Microsoft not to enable firewall by default. <br />
Sure they had some marketing and compatibility reasons, not forgetting &quot;convicted monopolist should not add features to the OS and those added should either be removed or very well hidden&quot; mantra.<br />
<br />
So, I, for one is very glad that Microsoft added firewall and antivirus reminder to SP2. <br />
<br />
&gt;2- how much of a slowdown does sp2 inflict? <br />
<br />
Haven't seen any.<br />
<br />
&gt; 3- if you just use dial-in modem 56k, is security/firewall really necessary? <br />
<br />
Yes, with dial-up you are connected to the network the same way as broadband users, only slower. 56k is a download speed of 5 KB/second, or 300 KB/minute.<br />
Worms are often less than 300 KB, which means that you will be infected in less than one minute after someone finds you connected.<br />
Unless, of course, you were bright enough to enable Windows XP firewall (don't wait for SP2 to tell you that)- before you connect to the Internet.<br />
<br />
&gt;4- does sp2 support mount rainier/easywrite specs? <br />
<br />
Not familiar with that.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2004 01:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>thanks  BOFH  and  Russian Guy</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>from me, dan.<br />
<br />
easywrite is a spec to make writing to cd's as easy as a floppy. its older name is &quot;mount rainier&quot;. type it in google search, you should get hits.<br />
<br />
however, for this to work well, it needs to be supported by the OS<br />
<br />
i do have programs hanging or crashing. so 200+ mb mostly just security fixes? impressive.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2004 14:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>mount Rainier</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&quot;Mount Rainier&quot; also must be supported by the burner itself. Most burners don't support it.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2004 05:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Optimal refresh rate?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Anyone know if an optimal refresh rate setting will ever be included in a Windows update?</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2004 15:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>@BFOH</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description><i>1) There are no stability issues with Windows XP, non-SP2 along with SP2. Any &quot;stability issues&quot; you are experiencing are caused by user error, driver error, or hardware failure. Suggest upgrading your PSU and defragging regularly (every week or so).</i><br />
<br />
Of course its ALWAYS the end user or bad hardware.  Look linux can work with bad hardware and no the end user doesn't  have the same bull that windows produces<br />
<br />
<i><br />
2) None, it introduces significant performance INcreases, not decreases.<br />
</i><br />
<br />
I've tried SP2 for XP and i find still that an unpached xp box WILL out perform a patched one.<br />
<br />
<i><br />
3) Of course; your files can still be viewed and modified by potential hackers.</i><br />
<br />
Yep its the windows way!!!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2004 06:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title> </title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>...</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 20:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
