<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/8283/Gumstix_and_eInk_-_A_glimpse_of_future_plans_</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:16:28 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Heck, I want one too.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>In fact, when I looked at gumstix myself my first through was Ebook readers...hehehehehehehe.<br />
<br />
Anybody want to design and sell cheap open-format linux-based ebook readers?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 20:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>How many interested to convert Librie electronics to Gumstix?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>How many people would buy the Librie (~USD 350) + Gumstix (~USD 110) + a hypothetical conversion kit (say, ~ $150)?<br />
<br />
The Librie electronics would be taken out and replaced by the Gumstix. Detailed conversion manual would be provided. Soldring skills are necessary.<br />
<br />
BTW, this conversion kit does not exist (yet).<br />
<br />
Also, here is a review of the Librie: <a href="http://www.dottocomu.com/b/archives/002571.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dottocomu.com/b/archives/002571.html</a> <br />
<br />
And a Yahoo group for creative uses of the Librie eBook reader: <a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/librie/" rel="nofollow">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/librie/</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 21:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>source code</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Sony have published some source code here:<br />
<br />
  <a href="http://www.sony.net/Products/Linux/Download/EBR-1000EP.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.sony.net/Products/Linux/Download/EBR-1000EP.html</a> <br />
<br />
(You might get redirected and have to get a cookie first).<br />
<br />
The source includes kernel drivers for the framebuffer and sound chip. There is also a tool called usbtarget which looks like it might send files to the e-book.<br />
<br />
So, you probably don't even need a conversion kit.<br />
<br />
Does anyone know where I can buy one of these in the USA?<br />
<br />
--ralpht</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 22:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>re Gumstix and eInk </title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Sony's not too good at sharing; killed Betamax</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 22:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>overkill</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>This sounds overkill to me. Something like a TI-89 with a bigger d.i.-screen, about 8 Mb of flash memory, a sharp-zaurus-ish keyboard and port to move data. It could run a modified version of PedroM OS. It would be super lite, cheep and it would run for hours on two AAA batteries.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 23:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Been using a Newton</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>For years I've been converting books from Project Gutenberg<br />
<a href="http://www.gutenberg.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.gutenberg.net/</a><br />
to &quot;NewtonBooks&quot; for my Newton 2100. <br />
<a href="http://www.msu.edu/~luckie/gallery/mp2000.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.msu.edu/~luckie/gallery/mp2000.htm</a><br />
<br />
The problem is that there's only so many books of interest in the public domain.  Laws like the &quot;Mickey Mouse Law&quot;<br />
<a href="http://writ.news.findlaw.com/commentary/20020305_sprigman.html" rel="nofollow">http://writ.news.findlaw.com/commentary/20020305_sprigman.html</a>  <br />
keep extending the copyrights...not for the authors, not even for dead authors' families, but for corporations that will perpetuate their &quot;ownership&quot; for as long as they can buy congress critters.<br />
<br />
Until laws like that are changed, &quot;ebooks&quot; (or whatever you want to call them) will neccessarily be limited; in selection, in availability, and in what you can do with them.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://spreadfirefox.com/community/?q=affiliates&amp;amp;id=958&amp;amp;t=1" rel="nofollow">http://spreadfirefox.com/community/?q=affiliates&amp;amp;id=958&amp...</a></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 01:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Been using a Newton</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Sorry. Slightly off topic, but if you have a second riffraff I'd like to pick your brain about using a Newton for this. I have a feeling my machine (message pad 120) isn't up to par with the &quot;newer&quot; Newtons - but I'd love to use it as an e-book if possible.<br />
<br />
email: aaron (at) volvoguy.net<br />
<br />
Thanks!</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 03:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Gumstix, yes; Philips, no!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&quot;With their first high resolution product launched in early 2004 by Philips in a Sony e-Book reader.&quot;<br />
<br />
Being the software patent lobbyists that they are, I encourage would-be purchasers to avoid buying products from Philips.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://swpat.ffii.org/players/philips/index.en.html" rel="nofollow">http://swpat.ffii.org/players/philips/index.en.html</a></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>StrongARM Linux and the display industry.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>An interesting fact which is rarely noticed by the open source community is that a lot of display prototyping happens with Linux on the StrongARM.<br />
<br />
The reason is that the StrongARM has an integrated framebuffer, which handles all the hard work of clocking data out to a display, and Linux makes it super easy to write custom data into the framebuffer, and read/write to control lines through the /proc filesystem.<br />
<br />
The result is that you can write user-space code to control a display, which makes prototyping really fast.  It's even possible to prototype in scripting languages.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 14:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>StrongARM Linux and the display industry.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Ok, this may seem like a nitpick but the &quot;StrongARM&quot; processors are the SA-110 (used in the APple Newton MP2x00s), SA-1100 and SA-1110 (CPU used by original iPaqs, Zaurus 5000D/5500, etc).<br />
<br />
Intel acquired the StrongARM processor line from DEC, liked the idea (after some &quot;arm twisting&quot;) and made their own processor called the XScale.<br />
<br />
XScale builds on the fundamental ideas of the SA series (low-power ARM, integrated peripherals, etc) but it's a new design from the ground-up, not to be associated with the &quot;true&quot; StrongARM processors.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2004 08:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
