<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/9276/First_Look_at_Xandros_Desktop_3_Deluxe</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:10:31 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>RE:</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Hmm OSnews still in love with Xandros.<br />
Redundant articles, I'm im-bookmarking osnews, sorry...</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 10:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>well done...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>There are a lot of people who want an operating system that allows them to concentrate on the work they do on their pc, without the hassle of tweaking and configuring and worrying about their systems.<br />
<br />
And it is here that this distribution proves to be a excellent choice. Security and stability of the linux, and the beautiful desktop and ease of use of the Xandros.<br />
<br />
Excellent Work!</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 10:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>nice installer</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I tried installing, but Xandros 3 barfed up.  CRC'd the ISO, it's great.  Why not working??? Both 2 and 2.5 installed and worked fine, but apparently the new kernel screws a lot of hardware compatibility.  <br />
I think more people should be aware of laptop issues, by reading the forums @ xandros.com.  If the company pushes their great laptop ability so much, there should be a way to install on laptops.  <br />
Bloody hell.  Wake me up when Xandros 5.5 is reviewed.  Maybe it'll work by then.  These reviewers must hand-pick the components and/or systems they review.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 10:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>@ joujou</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>With EVERY major distributon's release, OSNews posts several reviews.  This has been covered several times.  I will mod down any comment that goes over this seriously tired nonsense.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 12:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>laptops</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>my laptop is really picky with its ACPI. I have been running X3 deluxe for the last week. I had no probs with the install. Some slight futzing with my wireless network (did not like a ssid with spaces in it...)..<br />
<br />
no majour problems for me really...<br />
<br />
i have not tested suspend/hibernate. I dont think I will either.. I just dont trust it working outside of windows.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 14:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Xandros Desktop 3 Deluxe</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Well I`ve tried it and I must say you can do fine with Fedora and yum install mozilla-flash etc..<br />
And it`s nowhere as stable as RHEL 4 beta 2</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>I am not always flaming</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>So I say this- it`s very good, welled layout/installer is easy etc. Crossover is there for the people that need that. Openoffice works fine for me, and mplayer gives med the plugins that I need. <br />
<br />
Overall a good relase tho</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Wow</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I just jumped on the OC torrent, and I'm geting less than 2KB p/s with 6 peers.<br />
See ya in a week when your download finishes Xandros!</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Wow</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>i download new torrents for the first two ISO images of Debian Sarge Weekly every time new ones come out, they finish downloading in about a hour, then i seed wm for a couple of days,  when the traffic dies down i stop seeding and wait for new ones :^P</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 17:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Please</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>For what they charge for Xandros, it better run flawlessly. They've got to be kidding.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Right on!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Excellent and fair review. And I have to agree that I have had the same performance issues as him. That's what really is not good about Xandros.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Slow torrent</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>just jumped on the OC torrent, and I'm geting less than 2KB p/s with 6 peers. <br />
See ya in a week when your download finishes Xandros!<br />
&quot;<br />
<br />
You may want to go to tlm-project.org</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2004 01:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE:Slow Torrent</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>That's alright, got it in 249 minutes.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2004 06:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Debating</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>If I wanna pull FC3 (which has angered me countless times now)  and try this.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2004 06:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Oops</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>No boot, guess that's a no-go for Xandros.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2004 07:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>@testy</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Don't most full time Linux users run with hand picked hardware?  I'd think most people with enough technical knowledge to overcome the hurdles would build their own rigs, and those that don't can always pay someone else who builds with n*x in mind.  And for god's sake, when you're choosing a laptop, consult tuxmobil.org and linux-laptop.net<br />
<br />
Would you really rather an OS be reviewed with hardware on which it's not fully functional?  I just don't get it.  We all know that hardware is an issue with Linux, and most of us know it's not Linus' fault as long as there are restrictions such as hardware patents and lack of standards.  If you're having problems on your hardware, you need to either deal with it, or preferably, get some new hardware.<br />
<br />
Have you tried disabling ACPI when loading the ISO Linux kernel?  Where is it failing?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2004 08:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>etc</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&quot;<br />
No boot, guess that's a no-go for Xandros.<br />
&quot;<br />
<br />
Was your problem Lilo01010010001 etc?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2004 01:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>new machine</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I tried installing on my friend's desktop and I can get to the choosing software screen then it spontaneously reboots.  Perhaps deselecting Mozilla angered the software gods?<br />
Tried it in APM mode, still no luck.  Methinks it's another distro for sure, but I really needed the CrossOver 4.1.  <br />
Mayhap another Debian, then, since I can just install the .deb file right?<br />
My review:  Xandros stinks.  SUCKS.  Bloody useless.  Needs some beta testers with non-hand-picked hardware and/or technical magicians to weave spells over the machine prior to the installation.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2004 02:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
