<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/9673/Novell_Linux_Desktop_9_Grabbing_a_Part_of_the_Enterprise</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:33:26 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Not GNOME-centric</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>After reading the review you could get the impression that GNOME is the default desktop of NLD - which it is not because there is no default.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Not GNOME-centric</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>No, but the installer gives you the CHOICE (as I already mention in the aricle), and I made that choice. I told it to install Gnome. And so the rest of the review would --naturally-- be about that DE more than anything else.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Great for new users</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>It is amazing where Novell have taken the Linux desktop, one of our employees has pushed it upon a total newbie and had amazing success, you can read the article at <a href="http://www.xolinc.com/blog/index.php?cat=4" rel="nofollow">http://www.xolinc.com/blog/index.php?cat=4</a> .<br />
<br />
I think it is great that they have remained fairly neutral with regard to Desktop Environments, overall it is a great way to ween people of Windows based solutions.<br />
<br />
I have found the Java Desktop System from Sun Microsystems to be a great solution when it comes to business desktops.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Not GNOME-centric</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&gt;No, but the installer gives you the CHOICE (as I already &gt;mention in the aricle), and I made that choice. I told it &gt;to install Gnome. And so the rest of the review would &gt;--naturally-- be about that DE more than anything else.<br />
<br />
Still, you could have said up front you were only doing the GNOME aspect.  I kept reading the article hoping to find something of interest to me (hmm... gconf meltdown, wouldnt affect me..).  At least some KDE screenshots wouldnt have taken too much time and been very interesting.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Mono</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>iFolder is made with Mono!</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>iFolder</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>The version of iFolder shipped with NLD is 2.x, not the Mono-based version.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Bleuh</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&gt;&gt; Your monitor didn't report its X- and Y-Size, this might<br />
&gt;&gt; cause display problems like unreadable fonts.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Do you want to configure your monitor geometry manually?<br />
<br />
Reason 1 for not using SuSE/Linux/NLD: those error messages are crazy.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 07:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Yet another &amp;quot;consumer&amp;quot; review</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>When are these reviewers going to view these distro's properly? NLD is aimed at the corporate market yet time and time again we see reviews aimed at &quot;prosumers&quot;. As a Senior Infrastructure Admin what I want to see is how it fits in the Enterprise. Does it have remote managability? (Zenworks/NDS), can we do mass installs simply and easily? What about mass patch management? Desktop lockdown and policies? These are major issues which stop Linux getting on corporate desktops.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Yet another &amp;quot;consumer&amp;quot; review</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&gt;Does it have remote managability? <br />
<br />
Via VNC or X11 or SSH, I guess it easily does. Most Linuxes do that.<br />
<br />
&gt;(Zenworks/NDS), can we do mass installs simply and easily? What about mass patch management?<br />
<br />
Yes. With Zenworks.<br />
<br />
&gt;Desktop lockdown and policies?<br />
<br />
Didn't see anything of this nature under Gnome/Yast2.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Yet another &amp;quot;consumer&amp;quot; review</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>To be a bit more specific, there is a &quot;remote administration&quot; pref panel on Yast2 where you can turn it on and off.<br />
<br />
As for lockdown/policies, I see no such thing, except if you manage to work around the &quot;security settings&quot; and &quot;profile manager&quot; panels and work through these for a satisfiable desktop configuration.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>DE choice in NLD</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>You CAN install both KDE and Gnome with NLD - just do a custom install and choose all KDE and all GNOME and then you get the usual choice on login.<br />
<br />
I wasn't too impressed with NLD 9 but then ymmv</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Not just installation</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Thanks Eugenia! You managed to write a review which is not 80% just about the installation.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Not just installation</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>My reviews are never about installations, if you had bothered to read them.<br />
Julian, just because you are pissed off at me for not posting the news about your product, you don't have to be an a$$ over here.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Weird bugs unacceptable</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Good review Eugenia.<br />
<br />
I must say I do like the overall look of NLD; and I used RedCarpet before and that product is a major plus for any Linux distro. However, those weird bugs you mentioned are imho unacceptable for an enterprise-aimed product.<br />
<br />
But that theme; it rocks <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> .<br />
<br />
I'll stick with Ubuntu for the time being.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Not just installation</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Eugenia, you somehow misunderstood me. I just wanted to thank you for writing a review that actually covers the characteristics and specific strengths and weaknesses of NLD, unlike most reviews of Linux distributions, which mainly cover the installation procedure.<br />
I'm not pissed off at you at all, and i didn't submit any news about my product, because i have none.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>about X.org configuration - try Elektra http://elektra.sourceforge.net/</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>about X.org configuration - try Elektra <a href="http://elektra.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://elektra.sourceforge.net/</a>. It makes X.org configuration xml aware.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>why is worth mention Xgl when you didn't install NVIDIA drivers ?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>first, it's great to see a review which is not written by a high scool student as part of his homework,<br />
secondly I just wonder why you did not install the nvidia binaries drivers ? are they supported on NLD ? is there a problem between their respectives license ?<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Cheers,<br />
<br />
Djamé</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Bleuh</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Obviously you don't know what you're talking about. This error message is totally valid, and could affect the quality of your display (fonts)</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Black screen &amp;amp; subsequent audio failure</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I had a similar experience on a test install of NLD9. The install crashed on an attempt to use the i810 video driver for my intel extreme graphics 2 notebook. Afterwards, every reboot would disable audio, and reset my keyboard to German layout.<br />
<br />
After several retries, I found out that the best install option was: during install, select the VESA framebuffer graphics. Now both video + audio settings are saved correctly. After install, use Yast2 to select the i810 driver, do not test it, but save settings; then, manually edit /etc/XF86Config, &quot;Device&quot; section, add line:<br />
Option &quot;DisplayInfo&quot; &quot;FALSE&quot;<br />
(xfree86 output here: Broken BIOSes cause the system to hang here.)<br />
Several other distro's (Linspire 4.5, Mandrake 10.1, SUSE 9.1, Libranet 2.8.1) were at least as troublesome in enabling video acceleration, so in the end, I couldn't hold it against Novell.<br />
<br />
Apart from that, it's a very nice, slick, GNOME-defaulting distribution. On my machine, KDE's installation was broken every time I tried (thrice), and there seemed to be an inconsistency between the distributed Mozilla (1.6) and some packages that required mozilla 1.7. Apart from these bugs though, it felt better than SUSE 9.1, and it encouraged me to upgrade to SUSE 9.2 eventually. SUSE 9.2, by the way, has no trouble enabling the i810 driver (probably because it's using X.org). But it's definitely less slick.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Novell Linux Desktop 9 SCREENSHOTS</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description><a href="http://shots.osdir.com/slideshows/slideshow.php?release=194&amp;slide=1" rel="nofollow">http://shots.osdir.com/slideshows/slideshow.php?release=194&amp;sli...</a></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>I had a similar experience with X under SuSE Pro 9.2</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I installed SuSE Pro 9.2 on a couple of servers.  The initial setup was great.  Display was working perfectly but when it rebooted I got a black screen.  Apparently, it rewrites the XF86Config file when I chose to change the resolution, to something a little bit incompatible.  I fixed the problem by copying the XF86Config.install file that SuSE had written in the default setup over to the new XF86Config file.  I can't remember the name of the file.  Problem solved.  I'm pretty sure the Novell Desktop works the same way.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Is there a free version?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I remember seeing a few places saying you could download NLD that wasn't an evaluation, but so far everytime I look, I only find the eval download.<br />
<br />
Would really appreciate it if anyone who knows where to download it would pass it on.<br />
<br />
Thanx...</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>YMMV</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I did an install of NLD9 b/c I was looking for a way to replace all the win98 installations in my office.  I have to admit I was really impresses by the ease of installation.  Unlike other distros I've worked with, setup was painless. I also did not have any of the nasty bugs that Eugenia ran into.  <br />
<br />
Despite that I had to ask myself whether saving 20-30 minutes on each install (7 workstations) is worth the constant subscription fee required to keep Zenworks patching and updating after the eval period. In my case the answer was 'no' but for others I could see how NLD might be worthwhile to look into.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re: Is there a free version?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>The &quot;evaluation&quot; is actually the full version:<br />
<br />
 <a href="http://www.novell.com/products/desktop/eval.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.novell.com/products/desktop/eval.html</a> <br />
<br />
The evaluation only allows up to 30 days of free package updates through ZenWorks (Red Carpet).  As I understand it, everything else is the shipping version and will keep working beyond the 30 day timeframe.<br />
If you buy the full version, you are basically paying for the upgrade support channels via ZenWorks.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Desktop Lockdown Functionality</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>If you are using KDE as the basis of or NDL install you can use Kiosk to control almost all aspects of the UI.  Everything from command line access to editing controlling desktop backgrounds.  <br />
<br />
...and Yast does follow  a HIG.  It follows KDE's HIG just fine and sense it uses QT it makes sense it would</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Minor correction</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Eugenia, would you please correct &quot;fairs&quot; to &quot;fares&quot; in the summary?<br />
<br />
I'd hate to see OSNews fall to the level of Slashdot, where errors such as the use of &quot;loose&quot; for &quot;lose&quot;, &quot;mute point&quot; for &quot;moot point&quot;, and misuse of apostropes in plural forms abound.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Minor correction</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I'd hate to see OSNews fall to the level of Slashdot, where errors such as the use of &quot;loose&quot; for &quot;lose&quot;, &quot;mute point&quot; for &quot;moot point&quot;, and misuse of apostropes in plural forms abound.<br />
<br />
At least in the comments section OSNews is already there. Surprisingly, it's primarily the native english speakers who have problems with words that sound the same, but make absolutely no sense (note the widespread use of &quot;I could care less&quot; for &quot;I'm totally uninterested&quot;).</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Nice</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>But not quite as well integrated as JDS for Linux. JDS gets rid of the redundant stuff and focuses on desktop use, especially in corporate use. NLD and JDS are both designed for the coporate enviroment so when evaluating, keep that in mind.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Yet another consumer here ...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I've been using NLD9 since the day of its release. Before that, I was generally a SUSE user, so NLD is quite familiar.<br />
<br />
The Gnome install is clearly more polished than SUSE 9.1. It wasa  real pleasure to find an out-of-the-box distro that logged into our Exchange server without a bit of drama. Great.<br />
<br />
Gotta agree that having YaST and Red Carpet side-by-side is a bit ungainly. You'd hope Novell will eventually build all the setup and prefernce menus into a unified panel (including package management).<br />
<br />
With ZenWorks for corporate administration, a clean Gnome desktop (or KDE -- take your pick); Red Carpet; Novell support; and the power of YaST, I really think this is an impressive business desktop.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re: Not GNOME-centric</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&gt; Still, you could have said up front you were only doing the GNOME aspect. I kept reading the article hoping to find something of interest to me (hmm... gconf meltdown, wouldnt affect me..). At least some KDE screenshots wouldnt have taken too much time and been very interesting.<br />
<br />
You're new to OSNews, aren't you?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>what is so great about yast?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>i really dont like yast, and yes, i know pretty much everyone disagrees with me. i find anaconda blows it out of the water at install time, and for configuration i greatly perfer DrakX. not only does it do pretty much everything yast does, i find the interface is better designed, snappier, and depends on python, not qt (which i never install). <br />
<br />
imho, the whole idea of a massive distro centric control panel makes no sense in a more general way. in gnome, yast really sticks out like a sore thumb, as gnome config dialogues really arnt done that way. i would imagine even in kde it wouldnt really fit in, since they already have their uber-panel. wouldnt it make sense to snap yast modules into the kontrol panel (or whatever its called), and have each module as a seperate applet in gnome. that way it would actually fit in. the bar is alot higher then it was five years ago when it comes to coheasive desktops in linux. (to my knowledge) redhat is the only one with gui config tools that actually looks like they fit in, and then only in gnome.<br />
<br />
anyways, was just wondering if someone could explain why yast rocks so hard, cause im obviously missing something.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>NLD</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I like Sun's JDS a lot more than I do the NLD.  JDS seems more polished</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>CRN</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Latest issue of the mag has the software packaged with it for free. full support and updates until January 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.crn.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.crn.com/</a><br />
<br />
But this is for channel folks...people that sell, support, design-- software and hardware for a living. If you fit that bill you can also get it for free via becoming a Novell partner at <a href="http://www.novell.com/products/desktop/trynld/" rel="nofollow">http://www.novell.com/products/desktop/trynld/</a></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 18:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>@mattb </title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Technically since Yast is GPL now any distro could use it and included it in to their setup (I believe Debian is working on it, not sure though). As far as integrating in in to Kontrol Center -- it already is since 9.0 I believe. No integration with the Gnome Control Panel though. Of course that makes sense since it might be hard to do because of gtk/qt differences.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 18:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re: Bleuh</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&gt;&gt; Obviously you don't know what you're talking about.<br />
&gt;&gt; This error message is totally valid, and could affect<br />
&gt;&gt; the quality of your display (fonts)<br />
<br />
Oh I sure do know what it means, and I did not say the message was invalid in any way. It's just the geek-level of the text I was talking about.<br />
<br />
What's up with the &quot;X- and Y-Size&quot; instead of just width and height?<br />
And &quot;monitor geometry&quot;? Uhm hello, what's wrong with monitor settings, preferences or properties?<br />
<br />
Anyway, my point was that error messages should be in normal English (or Dutch, or Spanish, or any other language), not some geeky devspeak (at least, that's what it looks like to me).</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 18:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>your name:</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>It doesn't want settings, preferences or properties. It wants to know how big the monitor is. That is not a setting, preference or property, unless you have some sort of secret NASA monitor the rest of the world doesn't know about. 'Geometry' is a perfect sensible word to use.<br />
<br />
on configuration integration - I really like the GNOME project that's dealing with this, gnome-system-tools. They're doing a heroic job of keeping their tools working across many distributions. For everything it covers, I like using it a lot more than drakconf, although they do the same job. It's not as comprehensive, yet, but it's excellent at what it does. Is there an equivalent KDE project yet? I'd like to look at it if so.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Silly Question about RPMs</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>OK,I got the install disks from a magazine (www.crn.com, refrenced a few comments ago).  The install was a breeze and the Geek-speak X-Size, Y-Size doesn't bother me, since I did pass my Middle School geometry class.  The automatic updates work fine.  So, I'm doing OK at getting started.<br />
<br />
But, how do I find RPMs for this distro?  It easy to google for &quot;SuSE 9.2 RPM&quot;, but googling for &quot;Novell Desktop Linux RPM&quot; doesn't work so well.  I would like to install Plone, Eclipse and KDevelop.  Installing Plone from a source RPM is no big deal, but KDevelop and Eclipse would be rather taxing to install from source.  Does anyone know it I can safety use SuSE 9.2 RPMs or if there is a repository of NDL RPMs?<br />
<br />
Is the answer so simple that I'm overlooking it?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Silly Question about RPMs</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I converted a lab over to Novell Linux Desktop and in the process I created quite a few custom RPMs for NLD.  You can download them at<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.pcc-services.com/files/NLDRPMS/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcc-services.com/files/NLDRPMS/</a><br />
<br />
Basically I just downloaded the SRPMs from Suse9.2, edited the SPEC file and rebuilt them on NLD.  I also rebuilt an updated KDE (3.3.2) if you want to run the latest stable KDE.  All in all these packages are cleanly built, pretty stable and won't bork your system up.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>@AdamW</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>on configuration integration - I really like the GNOME project that's dealing with this...<br />
<br />
Yes, me too. Especially the network monitor applet in Gnome 2.9.6 is awesome.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re: Silly Question about RPMs</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&gt;&gt; The install was a breeze and the Geek-speak X-Size, Y-Size<br />
&gt;&gt; doesn't bother me, since I did pass my Middle School<br />
&gt;&gt; geometry class<br />
<br />
..and so did I, but you and others fail to see the point.<br />
<br />
I would just like to see normal, no nonsense, English messages. That's it.<br />
<br />
Is it that hard to just have something like:<br />
<br />
<br />
NLD could not query the size of your monitor. Would you like to configure it manually?<br />
<br />
[yes] [no]</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: mgpeter </title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Thanks!</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>YaST Theme...at least</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Maybe it's more than just the theme that Eugenia doesn't like, but there is a full Industrial KDE theme included with NLD that makes YaST feel much more unified with the system.  Why it's not set by default is beyond me but...<br />
<br />
- run '/opt/kde3/bin/kcontrol' as root<br />
- go to 'Appearance &amp; Themes' <br />
- under 'Style' choose 'QIndustrial' <br />
- under 'Colors' choose 'Industrial'<br />
- Apply your settings and exit<br />
<br />
Now all KDE apps (YaST included) will run with a more unified theme...you might want to do this under your normal account as well.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 22:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description><i><br />
Now all KDE apps (YaST included)</i><br />
<br />
YaST is not a KDE application.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2005 04:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>YaST and SuSeConfig</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Eugenia interstingly enough has run into one of my major issues with using a Suse based distro in a corporate environment.  <br />
<br />
What hosed her manual settings was not so much YaST (the gui) but a background script run after almost any YaST change called SuSEConfig.  <br />
<br />
It tends to whack manual settings of almost any kind especially LVM settings btw.  In addition, any sort of setuid changes including ones necessary for LinNeighborhood to act correctly will get changed by this script on most YaST updates.<br />
<br />
This along with the fact I like gnome and the fact many projects do not support Suse as well as RH/Fedora for rpms led me to try out RH8 and ever since I have been working off of RH/Fedora but Suse is an incredible desktop distro for a KDE person if ....<br />
<br />
they ever put a leash on that damn SuSEConfig script.  <br />
<br />
It essentially IMHO breaks a major tenet or philosophical principle of a Unix-like system.  <br />
<br />
&quot;Unix was not designed to prevent you from stupid thing because that would prevent you from doing clever things.&quot;<br />
-- Doug Gwen.<br />
<br />
Annoying to say the least.  Disruptive actually in some situations.  This is not to say I would not love to see a Fedora distro with a good partitioning tool for install that allows resizing of partitions like SuSE or allowed for on first update the installation of the nvidia driver automatically for the user.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2005 04:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>I use NLD 9</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Love it!  I use it at home...and is the smoothest and best performing (read that as USEFUL) Linux distro I've ever used.<br />
<br />
Real Player 10 and Mozilla Firefox are nice built-in touches.<br />
<br />
This is a very solid Windows substitute.<br />
<br />
JM</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>USB malloc() bug</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>The nice thing about Novell is that they have the resources to put engineer time into the USB malloc() problem. A segment of Linux users actively use their webcam on a ( sometimes ) daily basis. This type of problem puts a damper on their fun <img src="/images/emo/confuse.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
<br />
Chuckles-</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>bailes:</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>they're still doing that?! Holy cow, I thought they would've given up years ago. Yeah, that was one of the things I hated the most when I had to use SuSE on my laptop for a while. If I go to YaST to change ONE THING I don't want YaST to apply all the settings it has for everything else automatically! Sheesh.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Well Done, Eugenia</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I almost forgot...thanks Eugenia for a well written piece.  (I describe NLD to my co-workers...and I'm sure I leave great features out all the time.)<br />
<br />
One final cool note:  As a beta-tester for SuSE/Novell, I received the 3-Dosk software a few weeks ago.  I have one full year of upgrades for free...and all of the other &quot;benefits&quot; that come from doing this.  (I had Enterprise Server 9 before release...that was cool, too)<br />
<br />
Looking Forward to Spring....(agus La Feile Phadraig!)<br />
<br />
JM</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2005 22:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Let me help you out...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Good review BUT, let me help you out...<br />
<br />
1) NLD is for the Corporate Environment, which means:<br />
  a) To do a &quot;real&quot; test, you need a corporate network<br />
     with SERVERS, hopefully all integrated with a<br />
     directory service like eDirectory. Think of managing<br />
     100s of workstations, not just one. Typically you<br />
     would have:<br />
              <br />
       * ZenWorks Server<br />
       * Bordermanager Proxy Server<br />
       * Groupwise or OpenExchange Mail Server<br />
       * File/Print/SQL Server<br />
     <br />
<br />
  b) The way it works is that eDirectory is distributed      <br />
     accross servers for fault tolerance, so each server<br />
     has a copy. Anyway, say you're the sysadmin and your<br />
     company hires a new employee. You run your web based<br />
     management utility and create a new user, assign rights<br />
     and security policy, etc. This information is<br />
     replicated through all your servers automatically,<br />
     then within seconds the mail server notices the new <br />
     user and creates a mailbox, the proxy server enforces<br />
     internet access policies and the Zenworks server <br />
     creates a roaming user profile, all automatically!<br />
<br />
  c) When the user logs-in to the network FROM ANY <br />
     WORKSTATION, RUNNING ANY O/S, all of the policies,<br />
     security, etc are automatically implemented. You<br />
     didn't see a place to configure security policies<br />
     because that is done at the server level.<br />
<br />
A network running integrated eDirectory servers is nothing<br />
short of a SysAdmin's wet dream. I encourage you to retest<br />
NLD with all of the proper equipment in place and you'll be<br />
amazed. It is that good.<br />
<br />
Please also note, NLD is based on SuSE Linux and thus runs<br />
a LOT better with KDE.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2005 00:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Fred</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Point very well taken.  Well done, Lad.<br />
<br />
<br />
JM</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2005 02:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
