<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/9904/Packaging_Tutorial_for_Xandros_3_0</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:45:27 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>nice</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Realy nice tutorial.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 10:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>debian compatible</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I tried Xandros 3 and managed to update it to Debian unstable without problem, then just ignored the Xandros network thing.  It's a very polished distribution and the file manager's great.  Also it's the only distribution that's managed to configure the bootloader properly so I can load windows from my second HD.  (added that config file to the pile I've collected from various distros where bits actually worked properly ;-) )<br />
<br />
Unfortunately it's noticeably slower than a pure Debian installation for me, especially in application startup time.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 10:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Though not actually wrong...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>...creating a decent debian package isn't quite that easy. Sure, you get something installable, but it probably breaks pretty much every guideline in the debian book. But alas, for starters it'd do, I guess.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: packaging tut for Xandros</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I don't think anyone mildly sane would ever use Xandros as a base for a Debian SID environment...<br />
If you DO want Debian SID, but cannot cope with the intricacies of installing from scratch, then the Kanotix LiveCD is definitely the best you can afford.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Kanotix</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>But the Kanotix LiveCD like most others comes with mountains of crap you'll never use.  I tried it as I'd heard the scripts make installing the ATI drivers easy, (I just got a load of error messages when I tried them though)<br />
<br />
The beta installer for Debian Sarge is completely automated apart from a few questions about your monitor, network adapter etc so it's really not that hard to use.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Back on the subject</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Great tutorial, thanks a lot.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
