Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 28th Feb 2006 18:51 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 100275
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-07-06
For the things one would use a Mac Mini for, a Core Duo is *substantially* faster than a G5, clock for clock. Yonah's per-clock IPC is 40% higher than the G5's per-clock IPC going by SPECint. This should surprise no-one. The G5 has certain design features (two-cycle ALU, group dispatch, long pipeline), that keep its IPC relatively low compared to an Opteron or P-M.
These features were compromises designed to allow the G5 to run at higher clockspeeds, but IBM hit power density limitations that prevented that from happening. POWER5 tweeked the design quite a bit, namely by adding an on-die memory controller, increasing the number of rename registers, and improving the group scheduling rules, which helped integer performance quite a bit. Unfortunatley, no iteration of the G5 ever got those improvements.