Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 2nd Mar 2006 12:58 UTC, submitted by Rahul
Thread beginning with comment 100702
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Compiz is an excellent WM in it's own right, and a lot of the code for compiz is from Metacity, just modularized. Having used compiz and looked through the source, it appears that compiz is cleaner and more powerful than metacity.
With compiz, you are able to dynamically load and unload shared moudles which governs the effects of the compositing manager. The settings that these modules uses are grabbed by a configuration backend, the one currently in use is gconf.




Member since:
2005-07-08
just like aiglx is using the pixmap-to-texture extension and want to use compiz effects aswell, it seems to me that somehow media has managed to make people think that there's a "confrontation" between XGL vs AIGLX (just like SELinux vs apparmor) and people has spoken about "redhat vs novell" etc, when the fact is that is that this kind of competition is the rule (kde vs gnome, java vs mono, dbus vs dcop, gstreamer vs the alternatives) not the exception