Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 2nd Mar 2006 12:58 UTC, submitted by Rahul
Thread beginning with comment 100852
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Too little too late
by archiesteel on Thu 2nd Mar 2006 23:16
in reply to "RE[4]: Too little too late"
RE[6]: Too little too late
by Tom K on Fri 3rd Mar 2006 00:46
in reply to "RE[5]: Too little too late"
It also does a hell of a lot more than XGL/AIGLX. In any case, by the time Vista is out later this year, anyone who has a system that is overall Vista-worthy will have at least a Radeon 9XXX/GeForce FX original or equivalent. Even Intel's GMA950 is capable of a lot of Vista effects.
Vista requirements are exaggerated. So it won't run on your Voodoo 3 ... boo hoo.
RE[5]: Too little too late
by segedunum on Fri 3rd Mar 2006 15:31
in reply to "RE[4]: Too little too late"
Will you people drop the "hefty requirements" argument already? Refuting it is getting to be too painful to bear.
I'm sure we could all run Windows XP on 128 MB of RAM, but of course, no one does. Why? Because getting the OS up and running is one thing, but getting it up and running, installing software and using it on a regular basis is something entirely different.





Member since:
2005-07-06
Please.
Will you people drop the "hefty requirements" argument already? Refuting it is getting to be too painful to bear.