Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 6th Mar 2006 15:52 UTC, submitted by netpython
Thread beginning with comment 101967
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Maybe it's not the feel he's after, just the look.
And OS X's desktop feel most closely resembles Next from which it gets its MDI (multiple windows per process treated as one) and object oriented feel (the trash is a good example of an object, any throw away/removal goes their). If you wanna approximate this much on X11 I recommend WindowMaker.
The filesystem is organized, ahem, in two ways at the same time. There's the Unix layer, and then packed on top is the Mac.App stuff. I just don't know why you'd want this, but Gobolinux might get you somewhere along these lines.
And what precisely is new or unique about a DMG? How do they feel different from zips and tarballs?






Member since:
2006-02-09
Nobody seriously uses OS X as a server platform except ad/media/creative types... and they don't know when their servers are hacked anyway. In all fairness, most companies shield their servers with layers of firewall, IDS, and other security policies that would even protect a Mac.
I just wish Apple would sell me Aqua to run on my Linux desktop - I would pay $150 to have that GUI on Linux.