Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 7th Mar 2006 01:37 UTC, submitted by Valour
Gentoo "It's been a while since I last reviewed Gentoo Linux because there haven't been too many significant changes in the past few releases. I've been using it as my primary desktop operating system for a year and a half, though, and I've been running my main Web/email/database server on it since October of 2004. There's a reason why I've stayed with it that long, both as a desktop and server OS - and there's also a reason why I'm writing a review of the 2006.0 release after a long hiatus from Gentoo reviews." More here.
Thread beginning with comment 102440
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
flabbah
Member since:
2005-11-27

I have to agree with hollovoid - I think my biggest problem with gentoo lately is that they have not hit a sweet spot on the "bleeding edge" vs stability curve. Many packages are out of date, and not necesserily stable either. I wonder if Gentoo's usage of gcc 3.4.4 is the result of old packages not being kept current enough to cleanly compile with gcc 4.x. They just upgraded gcc to 3.4.4 a little while ago, while Fedora Core Test 5 is using gcc 4.1.0. My Ubuntu Breezy install has fresher packages, and it was released many moons ago!

Edited 2006-03-08 05:12

Reply Parent Score: 3