To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Also, David's approach has been more manager-agnostic meaning the technology is equally suited to Gnome, KDE, XFCE, etc while Red Hat's technology seems give preferential treatment to Metacity.
I would say less manager-agnostic, since your only choice is to use his windowmanager Compiz. With RedHat's approach you can extend the existing windowmangers to support the new features of AiXgl. And some windowmangers, like KWin, already has a compmgr to extend.
It is only an X-server, you can use Kwin with it, but it doesn't have all the fancy stuff implemented. Give it some time and both metacity and KDE will work with fashion stuff. From what I've read they just replace the X-system. Both do it in a different way, but you can use both with any window manager you like.




Member since:
2005-08-22
if what David Reveman said about Xgl vs AiXgl is true, i much prefer the approach Xgl is taking.
According to him, AiXgl will require drivers to be fairly sophisticated and Linux-centric. Xgl, on the other hand requires only an OpenGL implementation.
Also, David's approach has been more manager-agnostic meaning the technology is equally suited to Gnome, KDE, XFCE, etc while Red Hat's technology seems give preferential treatment to Metacity.
Regardless, this news is clearly another win for Gnu/linux as a desktop, and for Open/Free software as a philosophy. Two similar projects are mutually benefitting from eachother's work. That's the real story here, and its very good news.
PS: i agree with Thom's treatment of the poster above. Its not about snobber or insult, its about not wasting comment space on easily self-answered questions.
Edited 2006-03-08 05:18