To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Your post demonstrates the need on both sides to provide more than one 'default' theme, and to make it easy to change that theme.
Because IMO, I like Novell's theme and I think Vista is really ugly (I've used Aero). Some like chocolate, some like vanilla, some like strawberry, and some like all three, some hate all three. Taste is so subjective.
If Novell could put together a decent theme to pair with their XGL effects, then it might sell.
1. What is easier than install a new theme?
2. Isn't it nicer to have one really good theme (yes, I consider this theme as very good default, the last thing I would like to see is something photo-ish and flashy like OSX has. Vista fares a much better ride with their default theme, although still to flashy) for default?
You might like Ubutu Human theme. http://perkypants.org/blog/2006/03/08/dancing-for-human-beings/
I don't, it is not simple and descriptive as default Tango.








Member since:
2005-08-19
I don't like the new theme. There's too much contrast (black lines in white background) and none of the pretty "3D" edges we've had since Windows 95. The controls don't seem to line up very well (double black lines in places) for this color scheme. The window borders aren't antialiased, and this is especially obvious in the plain white background window title bars.
Hopefully this isn't the final version. Vista looks better, frankly. I wouldn't pay money for Novell's new desktop. FC5 looks to include many of the "next generation" features like integrated search and some tasteful accelerated eye candy like drop shadows. If Novell could put together a decent theme to pair with their XGL effects, then it might sell.
And yes, I realize how easy it is to change the Gnome/GTK+ theme. That's not the point. They're showcasing a bad theme IMO.