Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 12th Mar 2006 18:29 UTC, submitted by Nix_User
OpenBSD "I started OpenBGP two years ago, after getting completely fed up with Zebra, which we were running before. There were lots of bugs, bad configuration language, performance problems, and since I don't speak Japanese - I had problems understanding the documentation. Zebra makes heavy use of cooperative threads, which leads to it's main problem: combined with the central event queue, Zebra can lose sessions while busy. Zebra successor, Quagga, caught up and apparently fixed many of the bugs. However, they still used the Zebra's design, which I think is wrong. So, the issues are kind of unfixable."
Thread beginning with comment 103722
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: nonsence
by Janizary on Sun 12th Mar 2006 20:17 UTC in reply to "nonsence"
Janizary
Member since:
2006-03-12

You're so stupid that I registered for this.
Cisco's IOS is disgusting to use, so yeah, Quagga's is.
And OpenBGPd comes with OpenOSPFd, the OSPF and RIP handling daemon.
Retard.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: nonsence
by eazy on Sun 12th Mar 2006 21:15 in reply to "RE: nonsence"
eazy Member since:
2006-03-12

Why it's name OpenBGPd if it includes OSPF anr RIP?

Edited 2006-03-12 21:19

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: nonsence
by Janizary on Sun 12th Mar 2006 22:04 in reply to "RE[2]: nonsence"
Janizary Member since:
2006-03-12

Why's it's name OpenSSH if includes SCP and SFTP? Because they're related and useful with one another.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[4]: nonsence
by Soulbender on Mon 13th Mar 2006 03:35 in reply to "RE[2]: nonsence"
Soulbender Member since:
2005-08-18

"Why it's name OpenBGPd if it includes OSPF anr RIP?"

Because it doesnt? OpenBGPD includes bgp tools, nothing else. Open*BSD* on the other hand does include both OSPF and RIP.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: nonsence
by ormandj on Mon 13th Mar 2006 19:03 in reply to "RE: nonsence"
ormandj Member since:
2005-10-09

While I agree that the OP was incorrect, I also think insult-throwing is quite honestly worse than being misinformed. -1 for you, shame on those who modded up an obviously *insulting* post which is very clearly labelled as "offensive" in the down moderation.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: nonsence
by Janizary on Mon 13th Mar 2006 20:03 in reply to "RE[2]: nonsence"
Janizary Member since:
2006-03-12

If you find an apple being called an apple, is it insulting? If an orange is called an orange, is it insulting?
I don't particularly find those situations insulting, but it insults my intelligence for you to pretend that my correct words are inappropriate because I called a retard a retard.
I saw a man call an apple an orange and I called him a retard for it, if you don't like it, feel free to ignore it, but I don't see it as an insult to call John Edward MaGee, Jr. a giant talking douche for his obvious taking advantage of simple minded people, nor do I see it as one to call eazy a retard for failing to read.
If you invalidate a point because it is made in a manner you don't like, you're going to really hate Penn and Teller's Bullshit and you're going to end up not listening to jack shit all, because noones ever going to talk to you.

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE[3]: nonsence
by kamper on Mon 13th Mar 2006 20:13 in reply to "RE[2]: nonsence"
kamper Member since:
2005-08-20

While I agree that the OP was incorrect, I also think insult-throwing is quite honestly worse than being misinformed. -1 for you, shame on those who modded up an obviously *insulting* post which is very clearly labelled as "offensive" in the down moderation.

You don't know anything about the OpenBSD crowd do you? A slightly thicker skin is required, but they rarely get nasty unless they are actually correct.

Reply Parent Score: 1