Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 26th Jul 2005 17:50 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 10391
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2005-07-06
While this is probably true among the current crop of experienced admins, what compelling arguments are there for companies to stay with HP-UX and AIX moving forward? What compelling arguments are there for HP-UX and AIX on new installations? Outside of legacy systems support...what is there?
There's world class support, especially for big enterprises you cannot beat the way IBM etc will actually develop custom patches for you. (No we DON'T wan't a "custom patch" from somebody of the usenet)
Also for AIX (which I know the best) if you want dynamic partitioning or micro-partitioning you have to have AIX. AIX is also particularly good with high i/o throughput (network/disk) which is why it handles our san backup solution for example. I'm sure HPUX and Solaris have similar strengths in other area's.
Personally I see UNIX pushing out the mainframe on the high-end to provide high availability solutions and Linux pushing out MS on the low-end in the "one box, one server" category.