Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 12th Mar 2006 18:40 UTC, submitted by kaiwai
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y OSNews regular Kaiwai takes a superficial look at Vista and MacOS 10.4/10.5, and concludes: "To say that the changes in Windows Vista are only skin deep is missinformed to say the least; spend some time reading those sources I have listed, and even if you don't have a desire to run Windows Vista or particular interested in Windows based technology, it does provide some good resources explaining the changes and rationale behind those choices made. So from a purely technical point of view, Windows Vista is actually looking a whole lot more interesting than what the detractors have been saying in the computer press about the current direction."
Thread beginning with comment 104131
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: XPS
by tomcat on Tue 14th Mar 2006 00:51 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: XPS"
tomcat
Member since:
2006-01-06

hahahahahaha. You're kidding, right?

Not at all. Read the Wiki...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XML_Paper_Specification

The format and the schema are documented in a public spec.

http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/xps/xpsspec.mspx

And here's an overview of the license...

http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/xps/xpslicense.mspx

"Microsoft plans to freely license XPS technology to encourage its use as general-purpose documents. Microsoft will grant a royalty-free copyright license to copy, display, and distribute the XML Paper Specification. Microsoft will also grant a royalty-free patent license to read, write and render XPS Documents. Execution of the licenses will be straightforward and will not require the company to sign and return the license agreement. There will be a requirement that any XPS implementation that is distributed, licensed or sold contain a notice in the source code of the implementation indicating that Microsoft may have intellectual property associated with the implementation and to provide a link to where the license may be obtained from Microsoft. The patent license will also include a covenant not to sue provision for companies engaged in certain businesses; the provision contents and reasoning are explained below."

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[4]: XPS
by gregk on Tue 14th Mar 2006 03:22 in reply to "RE[3]: XPS"
gregk Member since:
2006-03-13

Yeah, but you missed this part of the patent license

"You are not licensed to sublicense or transfer your rights."

this means that everyone I distribute an implementation to must take a license directly from MS. So creating an implementation under the GPL o similar free license is not allowed. Plus, the covenant not to sue is very narrow, only applying to hardware vendors or companies that support the hardware vendors. So everyone else is at risk anyway.

It doesn't matter what the MS marketing materials say, you have to read the fine print. This "open" standard is so open that there cannot be a FLOSS implementation. No matter what you want to believe, this is not an open standard like pdf is.

Reply Parent Score: 2