Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 19th Mar 2006 15:36 UTC
Google In a move that alleviates some privacy concerns, a federal judge granted part of a Justice Department request for Google search data but said users' search queries were off-limits. The 21-page order [.pdf] issued Friday by US District Judge James Ware, represented little change from his stance at a hearing earlier this week.
Thread beginning with comment 105743
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: disgusting
by MamiyaOtaru on Sun 19th Mar 2006 19:26 UTC in reply to "disgusting"
MamiyaOtaru
Member since:
2005-11-11

so much for privacy!!

Did you RTFA?

"It's a well-reasoned decision, and it does minimize privacy and civil liberties implications," said Beth Givens, director of the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse.

The judge said Google did not have to turn over any search results. The only thing they are asked to turn over is a random sample of 50,000 sites they index. If anything, it sets a precedent for search engines being able to refuse to give information to the feds. Your reaction just seems a little knee-jerk ;)

The decision is a win. If Google has the right to refuse to hand over 5000 random search results (without IPs), I don't think we have to worry too much about them being forced at a later date to hand over anything that might actually incriminate someone or compromise anyone's privacy.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5

RE[2]: disgusting
by Adurbe on Sun 19th Mar 2006 23:53 in reply to "RE: disgusting"
Adurbe Member since:
2005-07-06

50,000 sites not directly related to the case.

Its not beyond the realm to assume u couold argue for specifics as and when

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1