Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 19th Mar 2006 15:36 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 105743
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.






Member since:
2005-11-11
so much for privacy!!
Did you RTFA?
"It's a well-reasoned decision, and it does minimize privacy and civil liberties implications," said Beth Givens, director of the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse.
The judge said Google did not have to turn over any search results. The only thing they are asked to turn over is a random sample of 50,000 sites they index. If anything, it sets a precedent for search engines being able to refuse to give information to the feds. Your reaction just seems a little knee-jerk
The decision is a win. If Google has the right to refuse to hand over 5000 random search results (without IPs), I don't think we have to worry too much about them being forced at a later date to hand over anything that might actually incriminate someone or compromise anyone's privacy.