Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 22nd Mar 2006 22:06 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 106930
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Intel is piss-eager to show off what an x86 platform could be without legacy restrictions, and the results speak for themselves.
Translation - You didnt actually compare the results for yourself, and you have no idea if and what these legacy resrictions are (or if they even exist from the end users perspective).
Edited 2006-03-23 08:53






Member since:
2005-11-14
Asus assembled the PBs. Their contribution starts and ends there; Apple designed the boards, chose the circuitry and gave Asus the blueprints. I've seen Asus laptops and they don't resemble Powerbooks under the hood.
The difference now is that Apple gave Intel the specs, the case blueprints and Intel essentially did the rest of the design process.
For all the other reasons for the switch, the repeated theme here is that Apple no longer has the mojo at building computers, and Motorola/IBM refused to partner enough to keep a competitive edge. Intel is piss-eager to show off what an x86 platform could be without legacy restrictions, and the results speak for themselves.
The irony here is that the MacBook Pros are only fractionally comparable to Dell laptops running patched versions of Tiger, but that they run Windows much faster than those same laptops.