Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 22nd Mar 2006 22:06 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 106974
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"What I noticed with the benchmarks is that even though the processors were identical for laptops #1 to #4 the graphics GPU were not. Only laptops #3 and #4 used NVIDIA Geforce Go 7800 GPU where as laptop #1 and #2 used ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 and X1600."
The MacBook Pro has an ATI X1600, BUT NO ACCELERATED DRIVERS yet -only a generic VGA-like driver- so I doubt there is any advantage in that.




Member since:
2005-07-10
Re: "I find these benchmarks claims surrounding apple products to be highly dubious"
I agree. This article is a waist of time to read. When benchmarking OSX, Windows and Linux on systems all hardware should be equal. Also the OS should run natively on the hardware, not emulated (ie: VMWare, Rosetta). What I noticed with the benchmarks is that even though the processors were identical for laptops #1 to #4 the graphics GPU were not. Only laptops #3 and #4 used NVIDIA Geforce Go 7800 GPU where as laptop #1 and #2 used ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 and X1600. I discounted laptops #5 and #6 used in the benchmark due to not only the GPU didn't match but also the processors were not Intel Core Duo. Instead the final two laptops used Pentium M processors which even the Pentium M were not identical to each other.
A suggestion for OSNews staff is to review articles submitted by either the author or third party prior to posting or linking it on OSNews. A job normally handled by the Editor.
Edited 2006-03-23 00:42